A Rasch Analysis

While there has been research on the diffusion of a particular type of innovation, few if any studies have examined the acceptance of a set of innovations (behavioral innovativeness) over time. This study using the Rasch methodology found evidence that computer hardware innovations are adopted in a particular order. The same could not be said for computer software, whose acceptance may be application based. This study applied a theoretical framework based on the diffusion of innovation literature (See Rodgers 1995). Data was collected via a telephone survey of 302 computer users. Scores obtained from Rasch analysis were used as the dependent variable (that of behavioral innovativeness) in a regression analysis, against factors such as overall innovativeness, use innovativeness, opinion leadership/acceptance, product class knowledge and use of sources of information. Determinates of the level of behavioral innovativeness were found to be personality traits of innovateness, (a willingness to trial new technology) and use innovateness (how innovatively existing information technology was used). The level of recent purchases in the last month of information technology items, a measure of leading edge use was also positively associated with acceptance of new technology. The research findings suggest that computer hardware manufacturers can assume that there is an order of acceptance of new technology and so can predict from the knowledge of existing hardware the acceptance of innovations in the future. Computer manufacturers can also effectively target early adopters of their technology given the results of this study. Rasch modeling can also be beneficial for organizations wishing to market diverse computer packages to users, as it allows a numerical scoring of a users acquisition profile or use of information technologies. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-687-7.ch013

[1]  Ronald D. Anderson,et al.  Evaluating the Relationships among Attitude toward Business, Product Satisfaction, Experience, and Search Effort , 1979 .

[2]  E. Chatman Diffusion theory: A review and test of a conceptual model in information diffusion , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[3]  A. Vishwanath Impact of personality on technology adoption: An empirical model , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Benjamin D. Wright,et al.  Solving measurement problems with the Rasch model. , 1977 .

[5]  D. Midgley,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Product Form Innovation: The Interaction between Predispositions and Social Messages , 1993 .

[6]  Jack J. Kasulis,et al.  Consumer Acquisition Patterns for Durable Goods , 1979 .

[7]  Junaidah Hashim Factors influencing the acceptance of web‐based training in Malaysia: applying the technology acceptance model , 2008 .

[8]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Measuring Consumer Innovativeness , 1991 .

[9]  S. P. Cornish-Ward,et al.  Ownership patterns for durable goods and financial assets: a Rasch analysis , 1997 .

[10]  G. Foxall Cognitive styles of consumer initiators , 1995 .

[11]  D. Midgley,et al.  Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement , 1978 .

[12]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities , 2006 .

[14]  Sudha Ram,et al.  Innovativeness in product usage: A comparison of early adopters and early majority , 1994 .

[15]  Jacob Paroush,et al.  THE ORDER OF ACQUISITION OF CONSUMER DURABLES , 1965 .

[16]  R. Layton,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Information Seeking Behavior , 1981 .

[17]  Samuel Mudd,et al.  The place of innovativeness in models of the adoption process: an integrative review , 1990 .

[18]  Consumer Knowledge Assessment: How Product Experience and Knowledge of Brands, Attributes, and Features Affects What We Think We Know , 1992 .

[19]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  The link between attractiveness of “Extrabrand” attributes and the adoption of innovations , 1999 .

[20]  Clark Leavitt,et al.  Development of a Scale For Innovativeness , 1975 .

[21]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  The generality/specificity issue in consumer innovativeness research , 1995 .

[22]  Linda L. Price,et al.  Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness: Concepts, measurement, and implications , 1990 .

[23]  Thomas F. Stafford,et al.  An expanded model of logistics service quality: Incorporating logistics information technology , 2008 .

[24]  G. Foxall,et al.  Cognitive style and use-innovativeness for applications software in home computing: implications for new product strategy , 1993 .

[25]  Tatjana Takševa Social Software and the Evolution of User Expertise: Future Trends in Knowledge Creation and Dissemination , 2012 .

[26]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Identifying early adopters of new IT products: A case of Windows 95 , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[27]  L. Flynn,et al.  Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales , 1996 .

[28]  Steve Clarke,et al.  End-user Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications , 2008 .

[29]  S. A. Baumgarten The Innovative Communicator in the Diffusion Process , 1975 .

[30]  M. Wedel,et al.  A CROSS -NATIONAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE INDIVIDUAL AND NATIONAL CULTURAL ANTECEDENTS OF CONSUMER INNOVATIVENESS , 1999 .

[31]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research , 1985 .

[32]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis , 1980 .

[33]  Identifying innovative behavior patterns using canonical analysis , 1977 .

[34]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  The Validity Of A Scale To Measure Global Innovativeness , 2011 .

[35]  Geoffrey N. Soutar,et al.  Consumer Acquisition Patterns for Durable Goods: A Rasch Analysis , 1990 .

[36]  G. Soutar,et al.  Consumer Acquisition Patterns for Durable Goods: Australian Evidence , 1982 .

[37]  Martin D. Goslar,et al.  Marketing and the adoption of microcomputers: An application of diffusion theory , 1987 .

[39]  Huaying Shu,et al.  Review of relationships among variables in TAM , 2008 .

[40]  E. Hirschman Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity , 1980 .

[41]  D. Midgley A Simple Mathematical Theory of Innovative Behavior , 1976 .

[42]  M. Sujan,et al.  Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments , 1985 .

[43]  A. Rao,et al.  The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations , 1988 .

[44]  Jue Zhao,et al.  Extending TAM for online learning systems: An intrinsic motivation perspective , 2008 .

[45]  Gregory E. Truman Software Use Through Monadic and Dyadic Procedure: User-Friendly or Not-So-Friendly? , 2005, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[46]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  Contrasting IT Capability and Organizational Types: Implications for Firm Performance , 2010, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[47]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Exploring Chinese users' acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  Blanca Hernández,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model to include the IT decision-maker: A study of business management software , 2008 .

[49]  Alex S.L. Tsang,et al.  Newsgroup participants as opinion leaders and seekers in online and offline communication environments , 2005 .