Framework for the analysis of executive information systems based on the perceived usefulness and the perceived ease of use

The acquisition and use of information are key factors in successful executive performance. Although there are various and different media that executives use to obtain information, in the last decade the academic research has emphasised computer-based systems. Inside this group of systems, we can find the Executive Information Systems (EIS), which are tools that can help executives to obtain relevant informationmore efficiently.Recently, EIS have been analyzed through the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with significant results. A deeper review of these results, the existing literature, as well as our own experience, suggest there are some factors that affect to the use of EIS indirectly or as moderating variables, instead of directly as recent studies suggest. The objective of our research is to propose a framework based on the TAM, which shows the different types of factors that affect to the Perceived Usefulness (U) and Perceived Ease of Use(EOU) of EIS, as well as how the kind of influence of these factors on U and EOU. ©© Intangible Capital, 2009 – 5(4):370-386 – ISSN: 1697-9818 doi: 10.3926/ic.2009.v5n4.p370-386 Framework for the analysis of executive information systems based on... 371 J.L. Cano Giner – V. Fernandez – M. Díaz Boladeras

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[2]  Peter A. O'Donnell,et al.  Executive information systems development in an emerging economy , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Fred J. Heemstra,et al.  Senior executives' use of information technology , 2001, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[4]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  EIS support for the strategic management process , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[6]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Critical success factors revisited: success and failure cases of information systems for senior executives , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  Gilbert Babin,et al.  A metadatabase-enabled executive information system (Part A): A flexible and adaptable architecture , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Distributed intelligent executive information systems , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Including Soft Information in EISs , 1996, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[10]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[11]  Minder Chen,et al.  A Model-Driven Approach to Accessing Managerial Information: The Development of a Repository-Based Executive Information System , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  John F. Rockart,et al.  Executive Support Systems: The Emergence of Top Management Computer Use , 1988 .

[13]  J. Rockart Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[14]  John D. C. Little,et al.  Comments on "Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus" , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[15]  K. D. Schenk,et al.  Getting the Job Done with HuRBIE: A Human Resources EIS , 1993 .

[16]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  A cross-cultural study of executive information systems , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  D. Leidner,et al.  The Impact of Executive Information Systems on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making , 1995 .

[18]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[19]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Executive Information Systems: A Framework for Development and a Survey of Current Practices , 1991, MIS Q..

[20]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Sid L. Huff,et al.  Searching and Scanning: How Executives Obtain Information From Executive Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[22]  Rick L. Wilson,et al.  An examination of executive information system (EIS) users , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  The management information and decision support (MIDS) system at Lockheed-Georgia , 1993 .

[24]  Jose L. Salmeron,et al.  EIS evolution in large Spanish businesses , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[25]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Emmanuel Fragnière,et al.  Nestlé Improves Its Financial Reporting with Management Science , 2005, Interfaces.

[27]  John D. C. Little,et al.  Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[29]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[30]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Assessing the value of conoco's EIS , 1993 .

[31]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  The Strategic Business Objectives Method for Guiding Executive Information Systems Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Gilbert Babin,et al.  A metadatabase-enabled executive information system (Part B): Methods for dynamic multidimensional data analysis , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[33]  Hugh J. Watson Avoiding hidden EIS pitfalls , 1993 .

[34]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[35]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[36]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Organizational Factors Affecting the Success of End-User Computing , 1986, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Gary Klein,et al.  Strategic information and strategic decision making: the EIS/CEO interface in smaller manufacturing companies , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Jose L. Salmeron,et al.  An AHP-based methodology to rank critical success factors of executive information systems , 2005, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[39]  Jose L. Salmeron,et al.  EIS profitability, costs and benefits: an evolutionary approach , 2002, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[40]  Henry Mintzberg The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[41]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[42]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Using EIS to respond to dynamic business conditions , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[43]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Determining Information Requirements for an EIS , 1993, MIS Q..

[44]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Determinates of EIS acceptance , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[45]  Robert B. Adams,et al.  EIS: It Can Work in the Public Sector , 1990, MIS Q..

[46]  Andrew Stein Re-engineering the executive: The 4th generation of EIS , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Rick L. Wilson,et al.  Gaining User Acceptance of an EIS , 1997, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[48]  Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al.  Key antecedents of Executive Information System success: a path analytic approach , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[49]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Executive information system failure: a New Zealand case study , 1997, PACIS.

[50]  Jeretta Horn Nord,et al.  Why managers use executive support systems , 1995 .

[51]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..