Framework for the analysis of executive information systems based on the perceived usefulness and the perceived ease of use
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Fred D. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .
[2] Peter A. O'Donnell,et al. Executive information systems development in an emerging economy , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..
[3] Fred J. Heemstra,et al. Senior executives' use of information technology , 2001, Inf. Softw. Technol..
[4] Richard T. Watson,et al. EIS support for the strategic management process , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..
[5] Fred D. Davis,et al. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.
[6] Christian Wagner,et al. Critical success factors revisited: success and failure cases of information systems for senior executives , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..
[7] Gilbert Babin,et al. A metadatabase-enabled executive information system (Part A): A flexible and adaptable architecture , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..
[8] Efraim Turban,et al. Distributed intelligent executive information systems , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..
[9] Hugh J. Watson,et al. Including Soft Information in EISs , 1996, Inf. Syst. Manag..
[10] Matthew B. Miles,et al. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .
[11] Minder Chen,et al. A Model-Driven Approach to Accessing Managerial Information: The Development of a Repository-Based Executive Information System , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[12] John F. Rockart,et al. Executive Support Systems: The Emergence of Top Management Computer Use , 1988 .
[13] J. Rockart. Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.
[14] John D. C. Little,et al. Comments on "Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus" , 2004, Manag. Sci..
[15] K. D. Schenk,et al. Getting the Job Done with HuRBIE: A Human Resources EIS , 1993 .
[16] Joyce J. Elam,et al. A cross-cultural study of executive information systems , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[17] D. Leidner,et al. The Impact of Executive Information Systems on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making , 1995 .
[18] John Ingham,et al. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..
[19] R. Kelly Rainer,et al. Executive Information Systems: A Framework for Development and a Survey of Current Practices , 1991, MIS Q..
[20] Fred D. Davis,et al. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[21] Sid L. Huff,et al. Searching and Scanning: How Executives Obtain Information From Executive Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..
[22] Rick L. Wilson,et al. An examination of executive information system (EIS) users , 1997, Inf. Manag..
[23] Hugh J. Watson,et al. The management information and decision support (MIDS) system at Lockheed-Georgia , 1993 .
[24] Jose L. Salmeron,et al. EIS evolution in large Spanish businesses , 2002, Inf. Manag..
[25] Viswanath Venkatesh,et al. Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..
[26] Emmanuel Fragnière,et al. Nestlé Improves Its Financial Reporting with Management Science , 2005, Interfaces.
[27] John D. C. Little,et al. Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus , 2016, Manag. Sci..
[28] Gordon B. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..
[29] R. Kaplan,et al. The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.
[30] Hugh J. Watson,et al. Assessing the value of conoco's EIS , 1993 .
[31] Hugh J. Watson,et al. The Strategic Business Objectives Method for Guiding Executive Information Systems Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[32] Gilbert Babin,et al. A metadatabase-enabled executive information system (Part B): Methods for dynamic multidimensional data analysis , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..
[33] Hugh J. Watson. Avoiding hidden EIS pitfalls , 1993 .
[34] Fred D. Davis,et al. A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .
[35] Sammy W. Pearson,et al. Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .
[36] Paul H. Cheney,et al. Organizational Factors Affecting the Success of End-User Computing , 1986, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[37] Gary Klein,et al. Strategic information and strategic decision making: the EIS/CEO interface in smaller manufacturing companies , 2003, Inf. Manag..
[38] Jose L. Salmeron,et al. An AHP-based methodology to rank critical success factors of executive information systems , 2005, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.
[39] Jose L. Salmeron,et al. EIS profitability, costs and benefits: an evolutionary approach , 2002, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..
[40] Henry Mintzberg. The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).
[41] Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al. The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..
[42] Hugh J. Watson,et al. Using EIS to respond to dynamic business conditions , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..
[43] Hugh J. Watson,et al. Determining Information Requirements for an EIS , 1993, MIS Q..
[44] Hugh J. Watson,et al. Determinates of EIS acceptance , 1995, Inf. Manag..
[45] Robert B. Adams,et al. EIS: It Can Work in the Public Sector , 1990, MIS Q..
[46] Andrew Stein. Re-engineering the executive: The 4th generation of EIS , 1995, Inf. Manag..
[47] Rick L. Wilson,et al. Gaining User Acceptance of an EIS , 1997, Inf. Syst. Manag..
[48] Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al. Key antecedents of Executive Information System success: a path analytic approach , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..
[49] Michael D. Myers,et al. Executive information system failure: a New Zealand case study , 1997, PACIS.
[50] Jeretta Horn Nord,et al. Why managers use executive support systems , 1995 .
[51] Fred D. Davis. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..