Spatial data for modelling and management of freshwater ecosystems

Fluvial habitats are inherently variable. They are shaped by flow magnitude, frequency, timing and duration, by the effects of upstream and downstream features along flow paths and by bioclimatic processes and human activities in upstream contributing catchments. Managing freshwater ecosystems requires tools and data that effectively account for these multi-scale processes. We tackle these challenges in this analysis of the distribution of 17 native and alien fish species in south-eastern Australia. A fine-scale, stream-link-based GIS database comprising an extensive set of ecologically meaningful attributes at multiple scales was developed to characterise the multidimensional environmental space of freshwater biota. This article describes the methods and data required to construct such a database. Boosted regression tree models were employed to analyse relationships between species and 20 candidate environmental predictors. For some species, competitors/predators were also included as predictors. Models were evaluated from several viewpoints: the ecological plausibility and intuition arising from them, their ability to predict to river links within the training area and for 11 species for which data were sufficient, their ability to predict to an adjacent but geographically distinct region. Despite modest environmental contrasts in the study area, these data and species distribution models (SDMs) produced predictions with useful predictive ability and discriminatory power. Critically, predictors of distribution identified as important for the various species modelled were ecologically interpretable. Several – but not all – of the models tested for transferability also predicted distributions reasonably well in the adjacent region. The GIS stream database and SDMs have immediate applications, but also provide a valuable foundation for developing more sophisticated tools for management and conservation in Australian freshwater environments.

[1]  John M. Morton,et al.  Using Random Forests to Provide Predicted Species Distribution Maps as a Metric for Ecological Inventory & Monitoring Programs , 2008, Applications of Computational Intelligence in Biology.

[2]  Robert L. Hopkins,et al.  Use of landscape pattern metrics and multiscale data in aquatic species distribution models: a case study of a freshwater mussel , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[3]  M. Sykes,et al.  Predicting global change impacts on plant species' distributions: Future challenges , 2008 .

[4]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Additive Logistic Regression : a Statistical View ofBoostingJerome , 1998 .

[5]  J. Friedman Special Invited Paper-Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting , 2000 .

[6]  Blake E. Feist,et al.  Landscape models to understand steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) distribution and help prioritize barrier removals in the Willamette basin, Oregon, USA , 2004 .

[7]  Isabelle Durance,et al.  Recognizing the importance of scale in the ecology and management of riverine fish , 2006 .

[8]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Stream Fish Ecology: A Landscape PerspectiveLand use, which influences the terrestrial-aquatic interface, can affect fish populations and their community dynamics , 1991 .

[9]  Matt R. Whiles,et al.  The importance of land use/land cover data in fish and mussel conservation planning , 2011 .

[10]  Gary A. Peterson,et al.  Soil Attribute Prediction Using Terrain Analysis , 1993 .

[11]  K. Fausch,et al.  Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes , 2002 .

[12]  Lee Belbin,et al.  Which environmental variables should I use in my biodiversity model? , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[13]  J. Leathwick,et al.  COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TREE SPECIES IN NEW ZEALAND'S OLD‐GROWTH INDIGENOUS FORESTS , 2001 .

[14]  Gerald R. Allen,et al.  Field Guide to the Freshwater Fishes of Australia , 2002 .

[15]  J. Ward,et al.  The Four-Dimensional Nature of Lotic Ecosystems , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[16]  Marwan A. Hassan,et al.  Predictive modeling and spatial mapping of fish distributions in small streams of the Canadian Rocky Mountain foothills , 2007 .

[17]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  Streamlining 'search and destroy': cost-effective surveillance for invasive species management. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[18]  Julian D. Olden,et al.  Assessing transferability of ecological models: an underappreciated aspect of statistical validation , 2012 .

[19]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors , 2001 .

[20]  Greg Ridgeway,et al.  Generalized Boosted Models: A guide to the gbm package , 2006 .

[21]  R. Norris,et al.  Irreplaceability of river networks: towards catchment-based conservation planning , 2008 .

[22]  Jane Elith,et al.  A method for spatial freshwater conservation prioritization , 2008 .

[23]  R. McDowall,et al.  Freshwater fishes of south-eastern Australia : New South Wales, Victoria and Tasmania , 1980 .

[24]  S. Hartley,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in the potential distribution of an invasive species: climate and the Argentine ant. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[25]  Julian D. Olden,et al.  A comparison of statistical approaches for modelling fish species distributions , 2002 .

[26]  A. Guisan,et al.  An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data , 2004 .

[27]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Ecological niche modelling and prioritizing areas for species reintroductions , 2006, Oryx.

[28]  Mathieu Marmion,et al.  Does the interpolation accuracy of species distribution models come at the expense of transferability , 2012 .

[29]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[30]  Uno Wennergren,et al.  Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes , 1995, Nature.

[31]  Joanne E. C Lapcott,et al.  Exploring the response of functional indicators of stream health to land-use gradients , 2010 .

[32]  MARY E. POWER,et al.  Linking Scales in Stream Ecology , 2006 .

[33]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[34]  P. Gehrke,et al.  Threatened and Potentially Threatened Freshwater Fishes of Coastal New South Wales and the Murray-Darling Basin , 2001 .

[35]  J. Wiens Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[36]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Spatial prioritization of conservation management , 2011 .

[37]  J. Gallant,et al.  A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas , 2003 .

[38]  Robert E. Bilby,et al.  A Logistic Regression Model for Predicting the Upstream Extent of Fish Occurrence Based on Geographical Information Systems Data , 2006 .

[39]  M. Austin Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling , 2002 .

[40]  R. McDowall,et al.  Crying wolf, crying foul, or crying shame: alien salmonids and a biodiversity crisis in the southern cool-temperate galaxioid fishes? , 2006, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[41]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Dispersal, disturbance and the contrasting biogeographies of New Zealand’s diadromous and non‐diadromous fish species , 2008 .

[42]  P. Jackson,et al.  Effects of brown trout, Salmo trutta L., on the distribution of some native fishes in three areas of southern Victoria , 1980 .

[43]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Complementarity-based conservation prioritization using a community classification, and its application to riverine ecosystems , 2010 .

[44]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Novel methods for the design and evaluation of marine protected areas in offshore waters , 2008 .