The Impact of Content Commenting on User Continuance in Online Q&A Communities: An Affordance Perspective

Online question-and-answer (Q&A) communities provide convenient and innovative ways for participants to share information and collaboratively solve problems with others. A growing challenge for those Q&A communities is to encourage and maintain ongoing user participation. From the perspective of motivational affordances, this study proposes a research framework to explain the effect of content commenting on user continuance behavior in online Q&A communities. The moderating role of participant's tenure in the relationship between content commenting and user continuance is also explored. Using a longitudinal panel dataset collected from a large online Q&A community, this research empirically tests the effect of content commenting on continued user participation in the Q&A community. The results show that both comment receipt and comment provisioning are important motivating factors for user continuance in the community. Specifically, received comments on questions submitted by a participant have a positive effect on the participant's continuance of posting questions, while answer comments both received and posted by a participant have positive impact on user continuance of posting answers in the community. In addition, tenure in the community is indeed found to have a significant negative moderating effect on the relationship between content commenting and user continuance. This research not only offers a more nuanced theoretical understanding of how content commenting affects continued user involvement and how participants' tenure in the community moderates the impact of content commenting, but also provides implications for improving user continuance in online Q&A communities.

[1]  J. Hausman Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[2]  Langtao Chen,et al.  Fostering Participant Health Knowledge and Attitudes: An Econometric Study of a Chronic Disease-Focused Online Health Community , 2019, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites , 2009, CHI.

[4]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[5]  J. Hilbe Negative Binomial Regression: Preface , 2007 .

[6]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[7]  J. M. Stevens,et al.  Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. , 1978, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[8]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  三嶋 博之 The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[10]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[11]  Pak Yoong,et al.  Rethinking Lurking: Invisible Leading and Following in a Knowledge Transfer Ecosystem , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[13]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[14]  Oded Nov,et al.  A social capital perspective on meta-knowledge contribution and social computing , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[16]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A linguistic signaling model of social support exchange in online health communities , 2020, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Sulin Ba,et al.  Digital health communities: The effect of their motivation mechanisms , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[19]  Ofer Arazy,et al.  Corporate Wikis: The Effects of Owners' Motivation and Behavior on Group Members' Engagement , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Most liked, fewest friends: patterns of enterprise social media use , 2014, CSCW.

[21]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  The Embeddedness of Information Systems Habits in Organizational and Individual Level Routines: Development and Disruption , 2013, MIS Q..

[22]  Kuang-Yuan Huang,et al.  A Social Capital Perspective to Understand Individual Contribution of Social Support in Healthcare Virtual Support Communities , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[24]  R. Oliver A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[25]  Xiao Ma,et al.  Understanding Members’ Active Participation in Online Question-and-Answer Communities: A Theory and Empirical Analysis , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Moez Limayem,et al.  How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance , 2007, MIS Q..

[27]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Posting, commenting, and tagging: Effects of sharing news stories on Facebook , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Li Zhai,et al.  Why users contribute knowledge to online communities: An empirical study of an online social Q&A community , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Michael Muller Lurking as personal trait or situational disposition: lurking and contributing in enterprise social media , 2012, CSCW '12.

[31]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media , 2009, GROUP.

[32]  J. Wooldridge Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models , 1999 .

[33]  Angelika Dimoka,et al.  The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Postadoption Phenomena , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Oded Nov,et al.  Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  Towards understanding members’ general participation in and active contribution to an online travel community , 2004 .

[37]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[38]  Bin Xu,et al.  Personality-targeted Gamification: A Survey Study on Personality Traits and Motivational Affordances , 2016, CHI.

[39]  R. Burt Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital , 2001 .

[40]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Why do participants continue to contribute? Evaluation of usefulness voting and commenting motivational affordances within an online knowledge community , 2019, Decis. Support Syst..

[41]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Psychology of Everyday Things , 2012 .

[42]  David Gefen,et al.  Psychological Barriers: Lurker and Poster Motivation and Behavior in Online Communities , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  R. Emerson SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY .10529 , 2016 .

[44]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[45]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  A Park or A Highway: Overcoming Tensions in Designing for Socio-emotional and Informational Needs in Online Health Communities , 2017, CSCW.

[46]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Why Do Users Participate in Online Communities? The Effect of Motivational Affordances, Comments, and Peer Contribution on Continuance , 2018, AMCIS.

[47]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..