Weak interactions govern the viscosity of concentrated antibody solutions: high-throughput analysis using the diffusion interaction parameter.

Weak protein-protein interactions are thought to modulate the viscoelastic properties of concentrated antibody solutions. Predicting the viscoelastic behavior of concentrated antibodies from their dilute solution behavior is of significant interest and remains a challenge. Here, we show that the diffusion interaction parameter (k(D)), a component of the osmotic second virial coefficient (B(2)) that is amenable to high-throughput measurement in dilute solutions, correlates well with the viscosity of concentrated monoclonal antibody (mAb) solutions. We measured the k(D) of 29 different mAbs (IgG(1) and IgG(4)) in four different solvent conditions (low and high ion normality) and found a linear dependence between k(D) and the exponential coefficient that describes the viscosity concentration profiles (|R| ≥ 0.9). Through experimentally measured effective charge measurements, under low ion normality where the electroviscous effect can dominate, we show that the mAb solution viscosity is poorly correlated with the mAb net charge (|R| ≤ 0.6). With this large data set, our results provide compelling evidence in support of weak intermolecular interactions, in contrast to the notion that the electroviscous effect is important in governing the viscoelastic behavior of concentrated mAb solutions. Our approach is particularly applicable as a screening tool for selecting mAbs with desirable viscosity properties early during lead candidate selection.

[1]  Kiichi Fukui,et al.  Behavior of Monoclonal Antibodies: Relation Between the Second Virial Coefficient (B2) at Low Concentrations and Aggregation Propensity and Viscosity at High Concentrations , 2011, Pharmaceutical Research.

[2]  D. Winzor,et al.  Negative second virial coefficients as predictors of protein crystal growth: evidence from sedimentation equilibrium studies that refutes the designation of those light scattering parameters as osmotic virial coefficients. , 2006, Biophysical chemistry.

[3]  D. Winzor Determination of the net charge (valence) of a protein: a fundamental but elusive parameter. , 2004, Analytical biochemistry.

[4]  Karsten Mäder,et al.  Assessment of net charge and protein-protein interactions of different monoclonal antibodies. , 2011, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[5]  V. Bloomfield Static and dynamic light scattering from aggregating particles. , 2000, Biopolymers.

[6]  R. J. Hunter Zeta potential in colloid science : principles and applications , 1981 .

[7]  Sandeep Yadav,et al.  Specific interactions in high concentration antibody solutions resulting in high viscosity. , 2010, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[8]  Abraham M Lenhoff,et al.  Direct measurement of protein osmotic second virial cross coefficients by cross‐interaction chromatography , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  Steven J. Shire,et al.  Viscosity Analysis of High Concentration Bovine Serum Albumin Aqueous Solutions , 2011, Pharmaceutical Research.

[10]  A. Mishra,et al.  Factors affecting pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies: A review article. , 2004, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[11]  A. Minton,et al.  Intermolecular interactions of IgG1 monoclonal antibodies at high concentrations characterized by light scattering. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[12]  Theodore W Randolph,et al.  Understanding and modulating opalescence and viscosity in a monoclonal antibody formulation. , 2010, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[13]  Sandeep Yadav,et al.  Factors affecting the viscosity in high concentration solutions of different monoclonal antibodies. , 2010, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[14]  R. J. Hunter,et al.  Measurement and Interpretation of Electrokinetic Phenomena (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2005 .

[15]  P. Carter Potent antibody therapeutics by design , 2006, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[16]  Steven J Shire,et al.  Challenges in the development of high protein concentration formulations. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[17]  J. King,et al.  Aggregation of γ-crystallins associated with human cataracts via domain swapping at the C-terminal β-strands , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  S. Harding,et al.  The concentration-dependence of macromolecular parameters. , 1985, The Biochemical journal.

[19]  C. Ross,et al.  Protein aggregation and neurodegenerative disease , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[20]  A. Minton,et al.  Rapid quantitative characterization of protein interactions by composition gradient static light scattering. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Steven J Shire,et al.  Reversible self-association increases the viscosity of a concentrated monoclonal antibody in aqueous solution. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[22]  C. Dobson,et al.  Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[23]  C. Tanford,et al.  The Viscosity of Aqueous Solutions of Bovine Serum Albumin between pH 4.3 and 10.5. , 1956 .

[24]  Steven J. Shire,et al.  Establishing a Link Between Amino Acid Sequences and Self-Associating and Viscoelastic Behavior of Two Closely Related Monoclonal Antibodies , 2011, Pharmaceutical Research.

[25]  D. Kalonia,et al.  Determination of second virial coefficient of proteins using a dual-detector cell for simultaneous measurement of scattered light intensity and concentration in SEC-HPLC. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[26]  M. Smoluchowski Theoretische Bemerkungen über die Viskosität der Kolloide , 1916 .

[27]  Michael Larkin,et al.  Free-solution, label-free protein-protein interactions characterized by dynamic light scattering. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[28]  B. Zimm,et al.  A convenient small osmometer. , 1946, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[29]  M. Steinberg Sickle Cell Anemia, the First Molecular Disease: Overview of Molecular Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Therapeutic Approaches , 2008, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[30]  C. Tanford,et al.  The Effect of Charge and Ionic Strength on the Viscosity of Ribonuclease. , 1956 .

[31]  Charles S Henry,et al.  Colloidal behavior of proteins: effects of the second virial coefficient on solubility, crystallization and aggregation of proteins in aqueous solution. , 2005, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[32]  Steven J Shire,et al.  Reversible self-association of a concentrated monoclonal antibody solution mediated by Fab-Fab interaction that impacts solution viscosity. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[33]  R Matthew Fesinmeyer,et al.  Diffusion and sedimentation interaction parameters for measuring the second virial coefficient and their utility as predictors of protein aggregation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[34]  A. Lenhoff,et al.  Molecular origins of osmotic second virial coefficients of proteins. , 1998, Biophysical journal.