A system dynamics exploration of future automotive propulsion regimes

In the industrialized world, the automotive industry faces growing environmental regulation in the form of standards for local air pollutant emissions and fuel economy. Yet another target for regulation in the near future could be carbon dioxide, as its greenhouse gas behavior becomes increasingly linked to climate disturbances on a global scale. And as the automotive industry expands its operations to emerging markets with exponential population growth, the appropriateness of a crude oil-dependent internal combustion infrastructure may be called into question for reasons of fuel availability and price. Out of concern for these developments, some auto companies are working to make the automobile more sustainable. A major part of their efforts involves pursuit of alternative propulsion systems in parallel with the evolving internal combustion engine. In this thesis, I explore how propulsion regimes might shift in the near term (ten-year) future using a set of scenarios generated with a system dynamics model. Moreover, in this way I test the usefulness of the system dynamics methodology for scenario creation. While a variety of fuels can be used to power a given propulsion system, I limit this study to one fuel option per system. Four specific systems are considered: a gasoline internal combustion engine (ICE); a gasoline hybrid system that combines an ICE with an electric motor to conserve fuel; a battery electric vehicle (EV) charged regularly from the electricity grid; and a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) that electrochemically converts hydrogen to electricity for propulsion. I first examine the motivation and method for exploring future propulsion regimes, and then provide a technology assessment of propulsion attributes on the basis of existing studies. Next is a description of how these attributes can feed a system dynamics model to explore how technology demand might evolve in consideration of the relative presence of infrastructure, availability, and awareness for each propulsion option. Using this model, a set of three scenarios is created by adjusting model parameters and providing supporting rationale. Finally, I discuss strategic implications both of the scenarios themselves and of insights gleaned through the system dynamics modeling exercise. Thesis Advisor: Charles H. Fine Title: Professor of Management Thesis Advisor: Jefferson W. Tester Title: Professor of Chemical Engineering

[1]  Vahid Motevalli,et al.  Overview of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Safety and the Potential for Hydrogen Ignition by Static Electricity , 2000 .

[2]  Jane E. Brydges,et al.  A hydrogen fueling station in 2005?-- will it happen : how do we get from here to there? , 2000 .

[3]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  J. Smith,et al.  Introduction to chemical engineering thermodynamics , 1949 .

[5]  C. Hendrickson,et al.  Life-Cycle Analysis of Alternative Automobile Fuel/Propulsion Technologies , 2000 .

[6]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Life cycle inventories of conventional and alternative automobile fuel/propulsion systems: Summary and conclusions , 2000 .

[7]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[8]  A. Maslow Toward a Psychology of Being , 1962 .

[9]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  A Relationship between Market Share Elasticities and Brand Switching Probabilities , 1998 .

[10]  D. Horsky,et al.  New Brand Positioning and Pricing in an Oligopolistic Market , 1992 .

[11]  Marianne Mintz,et al.  Fuel-Cycle Energy and Emissions Impacts of Propulsion System/Fuel Alternatives for Tripled Fuel-Economy Vehicles , 1999 .

[12]  John B. Heywood,et al.  ON THE ROAD IN 2020 - A LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF NEW AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGIES , 2000 .

[13]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Learning from the Future: Competitive Foresight Scenarios: Editors Liam Fahey and Robert M. Randall, John Wiley (1998), 446 pp., £27.50 , 1998 .

[14]  Peter Schwartz,et al.  The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World , 1996 .

[15]  K. Train,et al.  Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles , 1999, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[16]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[17]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  A comparison of hydrogen, methanol and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development , 1999 .

[18]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[19]  Pierre Wack,et al.  Scenarios : Uncharted Waters Ahead , 1996 .

[20]  A. Spilhaus,et al.  The Next Industrial Revolution , 1970, Science.

[21]  William Morris The American Heritage dictionary of the English language , 1969 .

[22]  Enoch Durbin,et al.  An Analysis of the True Efficiency of Alternative Vehicle Powerplants and Alternative Fuels , 1998 .

[23]  B. James,et al.  Societal Impacts of Fuel Options for Fuel Cell Vehicles , 1998 .

[24]  Warren G. Bennis,et al.  Maslow on Management , 1965 .

[25]  M M Mintz,et al.  The IMPACTT model: Structure and technical description , 1994 .

[26]  D. Jain,et al.  Modeling the Evolution of Markets with Indirect Network Externalities: An Application to Digital Television , 1999 .

[27]  Danilo J. Santini,et al.  MONETARY VALUES OF AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS IN VARIOUS U.S. REGIONS , 1995 .

[28]  Jean J. Botti,et al.  Powertrains of the Future: Reducing the Impact of Transportation on the Environment , 1999 .

[29]  Ari Rabl,et al.  PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT OF AIR POLLUTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ENERGY SYSTEM , 2000 .

[30]  David L. Greene,et al.  Engineering-economic analyses of automotive fuel economy potential in the United States , 2000 .

[31]  Jefferson W. Tester,et al.  Thermodynamics and its applications , 1974 .

[32]  David A. Masten,et al.  PEM Fuel Cell System Solutions for Transportation , 2000 .

[33]  John H. Miller,et al.  Active Nonlinear Tests (Ants) of Complex Simulation Models , 1998 .

[34]  Lutz E. Schlange Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[35]  P. Drucker,et al.  Beyond the information revolution , 1999 .