The culture of the industry and the culture of research

Culture is increasingly cited as being in need of change if the UK construction industry is to improve its efficiency and productivity. The paper argues that the concept of culture is amenable to radically different treatments and that the research community must recognize the consequences of this choice if it is to make a useful contribution to bringing about the desired change. The dominant research paradigm in construction management is examined and compared to an alternative approach. The consequences attendant upon the choice between these two are explored with reference to four phenomena: a study of quality in the construction industry, Japanese innovation in management, Deming's concept of total quality management and the situation of the site engineer. It is concluded that the dominant rationalist paradigm tacitly endorses existing attitudes and that if researchers are to have a role in changing the culture of the industry, then the culture of research must change also.

[1]  A. Schutz.  The phenomenology of the social world , 1967 .

[2]  Merlyn Isaak.  Contractor Quality Control: An Evaluation , 1982 .

[3]  A. Schutz.  Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality , 1972 .

[4]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[5]  Ann Taket,et al.  Beyond TQM , 1994 .

[6]  Roland M. Parsons.  SYSTEM FOR CONTROL OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY , 1972 .

[7]  Maximilian Weber,et al.  Politik als Beruf , 1993 .

[8]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[9]  Gerald W. Chase,et al.  Implementation of TQM in Building Design and Construction , 1992 .

[10]  E. Bittner.  The concept of organisation , 1991 .

[11]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[12]  P. Senge,et al.  The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook , 1994 .

[13]  J. Martin Corbett,et al.  Technology and organisation , 1994 .

[14]  R. H. Waterman,et al.  In Search of Excellence , 1983 .

[15]  D. Mitrany.  Methodology of the Social Sciences , 1945, Nature.

[16]  P. Eglin.  Culture as method: Location as an interactional device , 1980 .

[17]  E. Shils,et al.  The Methodology Of The Social Sciences , 1949 .

[18]  S. Piereson,et al.  In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies. By Thomas J. Peters and Robert H. Waterman, Jr. New York: Harper & Row, 1982 , 1983 .

[19]  E. Durkheim.  The Division of Labour in Society , 1934 .

[20]  B. Wolf.  The Machine That Changed the World , 1991 .

[21]  H. Blumer.  Sociological Analysis and the "Variable" , 1956 .

[22]  Abdulaziz A. Bubshait,et al.  Owner Involvement in Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia , 1992 .

[23]  Andrew W Gale.  The construction industry\'s male culture must feminize if conflict is to be reduced: the role of education as gatekeeper to a male construction industry , 1992 .

[24]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[25]  W. Deming.  Out of the crisis : quality, productivity and competitive position , 1986 .

[26]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[27]  Fabio Dei,et al.  Understanding a Primitive Society , 1988 .