Nonsternotomy multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: A key development in cardiac surgery

[1]  D. Glineur,et al.  The Use of Intraoperative Transit Time Flow Measurement for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery , 2021, Circulation.

[2]  D. Glineur,et al.  Durability of Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. , 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  D. Glineur,et al.  Commentary: Complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting-sometimes it pays to be conservative. , 2021, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  N. Rajput,et al.  MICS CABG: a single-center experience of the first 100 cases , 2020, Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[5]  Nicholas R. Teman,et al.  Minimally Invasive versus Open Coronary Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Cost and Outcomes. , 2020, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  M. Misfeld,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery with bilateral internal thoracic arteries: Early outcomes and angiographic patency. , 2020, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  Kai Zhu,et al.  Analysis of sternal healing after median sternotomy in low risk patients at midterm follow-up: retrospective cohort study from two centres , 2019, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

[8]  C. Mittal,et al.  Outcomes of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With Analogy to the SYNTAX Trial , 2019, Innovations.

[9]  M. Lemma,et al.  Minimally Invasive coronary surgery compared to STernotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: The MIST trial. , 2019, Contemporary clinical trials.

[10]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Myocardial Revascularization Trials: Beyond the Printed Word , 2018, Circulation.

[11]  A. Kulik.  Quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention: what do the trials tell us? , 2017, Current opinion in cardiology.

[12]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quality of Life After Surgery or DES in Patients With 3-Vessel or Left Main Disease. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  M. Ruel,et al.  Off-pump minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using the bilateral internal thoracic arteries and the right gastroepiproic artery. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[14]  Michelle A Mathiason,et al.  Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes , 2014, Innovations.

[15]  Benjamin Sohmer,et al.  Results of the Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Angiographic Patency Study. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  M. Ruel,et al.  Can Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting be Initiated and Practiced Safely? , 2013, Innovations.

[17]  V. Fuster,et al.  Quality of life after PCI vs CABG among patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease: a randomized clinical trial. , 2013, JAMA.

[18]  M. Ruel,et al.  Handsewn proximal anastomoses onto the ascending aorta through a small left thoracotomy during minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: a stepwise approach to safety and reproducibility. , 2012, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  Benjamin Sohmer,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[20]  Saif Usman,et al.  Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Dual-Center Experience in 450 Consecutive Patients , 2009, Circulation.

[21]  T. Gordh,et al.  The incidence of chronic post‐sternotomy pain after cardiac surgery – a prospective study , 2001, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[22]  M. D. De Bakey,et al.  Surgery of the coronary arteries. , 1972, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.