A modularity-maximization-based approach for detecting multi-communities in social networks

The modularity is a widely-used objective function to determine communities from a given network. The leading eigenvector method is a popular solution that applies the first eigenvector to determine the communities. The low computation cost is the major advantage of the leading eigenvector method. However, the leading eigenvector method only can split a network into two communities. To detect multiple communities, the modularity maximization is transformed to the vector partition problem (VPP). We propose an algorithm which is called as the partition at polar coordinate protocol (PPCP) to solve the VPP problem. The goal of PPCP is to find non-overlapping vertex vector sets so as to maximize the quadratic sum of the norms of community vectors. The proposed PPCP has two steps to determine the communities that are the network structure analysis and the community determination. During the network structure analysis, we obtain following issues. First, the vertex vectors belong to different communities can be separated by the distribution angles. Second, a node with a higher degree corresponds to a vertex vector with a larger norm. So, we propose three refinement functions including the noise reduction, the common-friends model and the strong connectivity hypothesis to improve the accuracy of PPCP. In our simulations, PPCP detects communities more precisely than Fine-tuned algorithm especially in the network with the weak structure. Moreover, the proposed refinement functions can capture the special properties of the network. So, PPCP with refinement functions performs much better than Fine-tuned algorithm and PPCP without refinement functions in terms of the accuracy in detecting communities.

[1]  Yizhou Sun,et al.  SHRINK: a structural clustering algorithm for detecting hierarchical communities in networks , 2010, CIKM.

[2]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Resolution limit in community detection , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Adaptive modularity maximization via edge weighting scheme , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[4]  Shahaboddin Shamshirband,et al.  Community detection in social networks using user frequent pattern mining , 2016, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[5]  David Kempe,et al.  Modularity-maximizing graph communities via mathematical programming , 2007, 0710.2533.

[6]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Community Detection via Maximization of Modularity and Its Variants , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[8]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  A New Metric for Quality of Network Community Structure , 2015, ArXiv.

[9]  Weixiong Zhang,et al.  Identifying network communities with a high resolution. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  On Measuring the Quality of a Network Community Structure , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Social Computing.

[11]  Jarke J. van Wijk,et al.  Reducing Snapshots to Points: A Visual Analytics Approach to Dynamic Network Exploration , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  A Spectral Clustering Approach To Finding Communities in Graph , 2005, SDM.

[13]  P. Mucha,et al.  Spectral tripartitioning of networks. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Ana L. N. Fred,et al.  Analysis of consensus partition in cluster ensemble , 2004, Fourth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'04).

[16]  M E J Newman,et al.  Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  A. Arenas,et al.  Community detection in complex networks using extremal optimization. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks , 2005, Nature.

[19]  Konstantin Avrachenkov,et al.  Cooperative Game Theory Approaches for Network Partitioning , 2017, COCOON.

[20]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Ranjan Kumar Behera,et al.  An efficient modularity based algorithm for community detection in social network , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Internet of Things and Applications (IOTA).

[22]  Yacine Atif,et al.  Community detection in social networks through similarity virtual networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013).

[23]  F. Radicchi,et al.  Benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Alex Pothen,et al.  PARTITIONING SPARSE MATRICES WITH EIGENVECTORS OF GRAPHS* , 1990 .

[25]  W. Zachary,et al.  An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups , 1977, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[26]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.