Organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing perspectives of supervisors and subordinates across four international samples

A total of 431 independent supervisor and subordinate dyads from the United States, Australia, Japan, and Hong Kong evaluated the perceived job role boundary of the subordinate ;, Participants rated the degree to which they agreed that the behavior described in the organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) scale developed by P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, R. H. Moorman, and R. Fetter (1990) was an expected part of the subordinate's job. Each supervisor was paired with only one subordinate, and all participants held the same jobs in the same company but with branches in these 4 nations. The scale used was found to have conceptual equivalence across all subsamples. Results indicated that supervisors had broader definitions of job roles than subordinates. Participants from Hong Kong and Japan were also more likely to regard some categories of OCB as an expected part of the job than were participants from the United States and Australia.

[1]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[2]  S. Schwartz Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[3]  D. Rousseau Psychological and implied contracts in organizations , 1989 .

[4]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors , 1990 .

[5]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[6]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[7]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. , 1996 .

[8]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[9]  C. Hui,et al.  Organizational citizenship behaviors and managerial evaluations of employee performance: A review and suggestions for future research , 1993 .

[10]  L. V. Dyne,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Construct Redefinition, Measurement, and Validation , 1994 .

[11]  札幌学院大学社会情報学部,et al.  社会情報 = Social information , 1992 .

[12]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research , 1995 .

[13]  Robert H. Moorman,et al.  Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors : do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship ? , 1991 .

[14]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[15]  Paul E. Spector A Consideration of the Validity and Meaning of Self-Report Measures of Job Conditions , 1992 .

[16]  R. Bies,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome , 1989 .

[17]  H. Triandis,et al.  Multistrategy Approach to Cross-Cultural Research , 1983 .

[18]  S. Schwartz Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. , 1994 .

[19]  G. Graen Role-making processes within complex organizations , 1976 .

[20]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[21]  M. Konovsky,et al.  Citizenship behavior and social exchange. , 1994, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[22]  S. Mulaik,et al.  EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 1989 .

[23]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and , 1997 .

[24]  Elizabeth Wolfe Morrison,et al.  Role Definitions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Importance of the Employee's Perspective , 1994 .

[25]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[26]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[27]  S. Schwartz Individualism-Collectivism , 1990 .