What does it mean to say that a physical system implements a computation?

When we are concerned with the logical form of a computation and its formal properties, then it can be theoretically described in terms of mathematical and logical functions and relations between abstract entities. However, actual computation is realised by some physical process, and the latter is of course subject to physical laws and the laws of thermodynamics in particular. An issue that has been the subject of much controversy is that of whether or not there are any systematic connections between the logical properties of computations considered abstractly and the thermodynamical properties of their concrete physical realizations. Landauer [R. Landauer, Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process, IBM Journal of Research and Development 5 (1961) 183-191. Reprinted in Leff and Rex (1990)] proposed such a general connection, known as Landauer's Principle. To resolve this matter an analysis of the notion of the implementation of a computation by a physical system is clearly required. Another issue that calls for an analysis of implementation is that of realism about computation. The account of implementation presented here is based on the notion of an L-machine. This is a hybrid physical-logical entity that combines a physical device, a specification of which physical states of that device correspond to various logical states, and an evolution of that device which corresponds to the logical transformation L. The most general form of Landauer's Principle can be precisely stated in terms of L-machines, namely that the logical irreversibility of L implies the thermodynamic irreversibility of every corresponding L-machine.

[1]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Reason, Truth and History. , 1985 .

[2]  B. Jack Copeland,et al.  What is computation? , 1996, Synthese.

[3]  John R. Searle,et al.  The Rediscovery of the Mind , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Andrew F. Rex,et al.  Maxwell's Demon, Entropy, Information, Computing , 1990 .

[5]  Craig DeLancey,et al.  The Computational Theory of Mind , 2002 .

[6]  James Ladyman,et al.  The connection between logical and thermodynamic irreversibility , 2007 .

[7]  Frances Egan,et al.  Computation and Content , 1995 .

[8]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  When Physical Systems Realize Functions... , 1999, Minds and Machines.

[9]  David J. Chalmers,et al.  Does a rock implement every finite-state automaton? , 1996, Synthese.

[10]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Notes on Landauer's Principle, Reversible Computation, and Maxwell's Demon , 2002, physics/0210005.

[11]  O. J. E. Maroney The (absence of a) relationship between thermodynamic and logical reversibility , 2004 .

[12]  R. Cummins Meaning and mental representation , 1990 .

[13]  H. Putnam Representation and Reality , 1993 .

[14]  R. Landauer,et al.  Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process , 1961, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[15]  P. Stekeler-Weithofer The Computational Theory of Mind and the Decomposition of Actions , 2008 .

[16]  D. Whiffen Thermodynamics , 1973, Nature.

[17]  James Ladyman,et al.  Physics and Computation: The Status of Landauer's Principle , 2007, CiE.

[18]  John D. Norton,et al.  Eaters of the Lotus: Landauer's Principle and the Return of Maxwell's Demon , 2005 .

[19]  James Ladyman,et al.  The use of the information-theoretic entropy in thermodynamics , 2008 .

[20]  Gualtiero Piccinini,et al.  Computation without Representation , 2008 .