All experience is not created equal: learning, adapting, and focusing in product portfolio management

This study explores the contingencies relating firm experience to product development capabilities, focusing on experience type (breadth v. depth) and timing (prior v. concurrent). Results from empirical tests in the U.S. mutual fund industry offer two primary findings. First, firms increase proficiency at adapting their processes to address new opportunities as they accumulate experience in entering new niches but face initial hurdles broadening their experience base. Second, concurrent learning is capacity constrained, as product quality increases in the number of products introduced simultaneously in one niche, but quality decreases as the firm’s concurrent portfolio of new products broadens. Jointly, these findings highlight that dynamic capabilities are built through prior adaptation experience and that management of a product development portfolio is an important managerial capability.

[1]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Portfolio Management for New Products (Управление портфелем новых продуктов) , 1998 .

[2]  Sheridan Titman,et al.  On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 1997 .

[3]  W. Sharpe CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK* , 1964 .

[4]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Learning to Compete in a Transition Economy: Experience, Environment, and Performance , 1999 .

[5]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products , 2000 .

[6]  C. S. Jones,et al.  Mutual Fund Performance with Learning Across Funds , 2002 .

[7]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[8]  S. Winter Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[9]  Diane Liang Rulke,et al.  Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance , 2000 .

[10]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Are Some Mutual Funds Managers Better than Others? Cross-Sectional Patterns in Behavior and Performance , 1996 .

[11]  M. Parry,et al.  The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes , 1997 .

[12]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[13]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment , 1988 .

[14]  D. Leonard,et al.  The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , 1998 .

[15]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[16]  Martin J. Gruber,et al.  Another puzzle: the growth in actively managed mutual funds , 1996, Annals of Operations Research.

[17]  B. Kogut,et al.  Technological Platforms and Diversification , 1996 .

[18]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Developing Products on "Internet Time": The Anatomy of a Flexible Development Process , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[20]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[21]  Mark M. Carhart On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 1997 .

[22]  Marcin T. Kacperczyk,et al.  Fund Manager Use of Public Information: New Evidence on Managerial Skills , 2007 .

[23]  Richard J. Zeckhauser,et al.  Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: Short‐Run Persistence of Relative Performance, 1974–1988 , 1993 .

[24]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  50th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[25]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[26]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[27]  K. Brown,et al.  Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry , 1996 .

[28]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[29]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  OPPORTUNITY AND CONSTRAINT: ORGANIZATIONS’ LEARNING FROM THE OPERATING AND COMPETITIVE EXPERIENCE OF INDUSTRIES , 1997 .

[30]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions , 2002 .

[31]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Experience Spillovers Across Corporate Development Activities , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Are some mutual fund managers better than others , 1999 .

[33]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets, and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios , 1969 .

[34]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[35]  R. Evans Does *alpha really matter? Evidence from mutual fund incubation, termination and manager change , 2004 .

[36]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[37]  E. Fama,et al.  Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds , 1993 .

[38]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[39]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Structural Incoherence and Stock Market Activity , 2004 .

[40]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[41]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry , 2004 .

[42]  M. C. Jensen The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964 , 1967 .

[43]  Jeffrey A. Busse,et al.  Short-Term Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 2005 .

[44]  Carlo Salvato,et al.  Capabilities Unveiled: The Role of Ordinary Activities in the Evolution of Product Development Processes , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[45]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[46]  Geon-Cheol Shin,et al.  Project Management Characteristics and New Product Survival , 2003 .

[47]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[48]  Vivek Tandon,et al.  1 Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological Innovation , 2008 .

[49]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[50]  B. Zirger,et al.  A Model of New Product Development: An Empirical Test , 1990 .

[51]  Thomas J. Cottrell,et al.  Product Variety and Firm Survival in the Microcomputer Software Industry , 2004 .

[52]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[53]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .

[54]  O. Sorenson Letting the market work for you: an evolutionary perspective on product strategy , 2000 .

[55]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technology Firms , 2005 .

[56]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities , 2003 .

[57]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Opportunity Costs and Non-Scale Free Capabilities: Profit Maximization, Corporate Scope, and Profit Margins , 2009 .

[58]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  Internal Vs. External Learning In New Product Development: Effects On Speed, Costs And Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[59]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[60]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[61]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Learning by Doing Something Else: Variation, Relatedness, and the Learning Curve , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[62]  Nicolaj Siggelkow,et al.  Why Focus? A Study of Intra-Industry Focus Effects , 1998 .

[63]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance , 1997 .

[64]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[65]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[66]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Overcoming the Crunch in Resources for New Product Development , 2003 .

[67]  Erwin Danneels Organizational antecedents of second‐order competences , 2008 .

[68]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[69]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  THE PROCESS OF TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETENCE LEVERAGING , 2007 .

[70]  G Breithardt,et al.  Distribution of knowledge. , 1997, European heart journal.

[71]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance , 2010 .

[72]  Nicolaj Siggelkow,et al.  Why Focus? A Study Of Intra-Industry Focus Effects: INTRA-INDUSTRY FOCUS EFFECTS , 2003 .

[73]  María García‐Vega Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms , 2006 .

[74]  K. Clark,et al.  Integration and Dynamic Capability: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers , 1994 .

[75]  Daryl McKee,et al.  An organizational learning approach to product innovation , 1992 .

[76]  Russ Wermers,et al.  Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock-Picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and Expenses , 2000 .

[77]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[78]  Mikael Holmqvist,et al.  Experiential Learning Processes of Exploitation and Exploration Within and Between Organisations : An Empirical Study of Product Development, Department of Business Studies , 2003 .

[79]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Managing the new product development process , 1985 .

[80]  J. P. Eggers,et al.  Cognition and Renewal: Comparing CEO and Organizational Effects on Incumbent Adaptation to Technical Change , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[81]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .