Potential risk factors for bovine Neospora caninum infection in Germany are not under the control of the farmers

In the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate, herds were identified that were likely to have a Neospora caninum sero-prevalence [ges ]10% by using a bulk milk ELISA. Individual herd data were obtained by a questionnaire. Univariate logistic regression showed that bulk milk positive farms had a significantly higher chance to report an increased abortion rate than negative farms (PWald<0·1). The chance to have a bulk milk positive herd increased with the minimum number of years a farm had reported an increased abortion rate (PWald<0·1). Questionnaire data, population and dog density as well as climatic data specific for the farm localization were used to identify potential risk factors for a herd to have acquired N. caninum infections. Within an optimized multiple logistic regression model ‘Number of farm dogs’, ‘Herd size’, and factors related to the municipality the farm was localized, i.e. ‘Mean temperature in July’, and ‘Dog density’ were significant risk factors (PWald<0·1). The present study underlines the role farm dogs have in the epidemiology of neosporosis. In addition, it suggests that the risk a herd has to acquire N. caninum infections is also associated with factors related to the farm location, i.e. factors that are largely out of the control of farmers.

[1]  F. Conraths,et al.  Regional distribution of bovine Neospora caninum infection in the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate modelled by Logistic regression. , 2003, International journal for parasitology.

[2]  H. Kindahl,et al.  A Long-Term Study of Neospora caninum Infection in a Swedish Dairy Herd , 2003, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[3]  A. Fritsche,et al.  Von der Bedeutung der bovinen Neosporose beim Abortgeschehen in der Schweiz , 2003 .

[4]  J. Frössling,et al.  Application of the Neospora Caninum IgG Avidity ELISA in Assessment of Chronic Reproductive Losses after an Outbreak of Neosporosis in a Herd of Beef Cattle , 2003, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[5]  F. Conraths,et al.  p38-avidity-ELISA: examination of herds experiencing epidemic or endemic Neospora caninum-associated bovine abortion. , 2002, Veterinary parasitology.

[6]  H. Barkema,et al.  Point source exposure of cattle to Neospora caninum consistent with periods of common housing and feeding and related to the introduction of a dog. , 2002, Veterinary parasitology.

[7]  H. Barkema,et al.  Natural transmission routes of Neospora caninum between farm dogs and cattle. , 2002, Veterinary parasitology.

[8]  B. Gottstein,et al.  Epidemiological investigations of abortions due to Neospora caninum on Swiss dairy farms , 2002, Veterinary Record.

[9]  F. Conraths,et al.  In contrast to dogs, red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) did not shed Neospora caninum upon feeding of intermediate host tissues , 2002, Parasitology Research.

[10]  H. Mehlhorn,et al.  Neospora caninum is an invalid species name: an evaluation of facts and statements , 2002, Parasitology Research.

[11]  J. Thompson,et al.  Ranch-management factors associated with antibody seropositivity for Neospora caninum in consignments of beef calves in Texas, USA. , 2001, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[12]  J. Dubey,et al.  Serological investigation of an outbreak of Neospora caninum-associated abortion in a dairy herd in southeastern United States. , 2000, Veterinary parasitology.

[13]  R. Anderson-Sprecher,et al.  Evidence of point-source exposure to Neospora caninum and protective immunity in a herd of beef cows. , 2000, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[14]  F. Conraths,et al.  Use of purified tachyzoite surface antigen p38 in an ELISA to diagnose bovine neosporosis. , 2000, International journal for parasitology.

[15]  M. Sanaa,et al.  Estimation of Neospora caninum seroprevalence in dairy cattle from Normandy, France. , 1999, Veterinary research.

[16]  M. Thurmond,et al.  Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum and abortion in dairy cows in northern Spain , 1999, Veterinary Record.

[17]  Y. Schukken,et al.  Risk factors for Neospora caninum-associated abortion storms in dairy herds in The Netherlands (1995 to 1997). , 1999, Theriogenology.

[18]  F. Conraths,et al.  The efficiency of vertical transmission of Neospora caninum in dairy cattle analysed by serological techniques. , 1998, Veterinary parasitology.

[19]  G. Marsolais,et al.  Seroepidemiologic study of Neospora caninum in dairy herds. , 1998, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[20]  D. Lindsay,et al.  Dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. , 1998, International journal for parasitology.

[21]  Y. Schukken,et al.  Abortion risk in progeny of cows after a Neospora caninum epidemic. , 1998, Theriogenology.

[22]  M. Thurmond,et al.  Effect of congenitally acquired Neospora caninum infection on risk of abortion and subsequent abortions in dairy cattle. , 1997, American journal of veterinary research.

[23]  P. Conrad,et al.  Evidence of vertical transmission of Neospora sp infection in dairy cattle. , 1997, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[24]  M. Thurmond,et al.  Herd-Based Diagnosis of Neospora Caninum-Induced Endemic and Epidemic Abortion in Cows and Evidence for Congenital and Postnatal Transmission , 1997, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[25]  D. Lindsay,et al.  A review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis. , 1996, Veterinary parasitology.

[26]  B. Ripley,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. , 1996 .

[27]  O. Johansson,et al.  Neospora species infection in a herd of dairy cattle. , 1996, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[28]  D. Weinstock,et al.  Survey of Neospora caninum antibodies in dairy and beef cattle from five regions of the United States. , 2002, Veterinary therapeutics : research in applied veterinary medicine.