Dual Process Theory of Thought and Default Mode Network: A Possible Neural Foundation of Fast Thinking

The notion of default mode network (DMN) and the dual process theory of thought, topics within different cognitive neuroscience and psychology subfields, have attracted considerable attention and been extensively studied in the past decade. The former originated from experimental evidence on the brain function obtained when an individual is not involved in a specific task, and recent research suggests that the DMN plays a role in mental and neurological disorders (Buckner et al., 2008). A distinction is made according to the psychology of thinking in the dual process theory of thought between fast, effortless associative processes and slow, deliberative ones (Kahneman, 2011). This theory has been exploited both theoretically, to better understand human thought, and in many applications of behavior modification (Thaler and Sunstein, 2008). This paper proposes that an amalgamation of the aspects of these two topics could be of mutual benefit to scientists within the respective fields. The discovery of the DMN has stimulated several hypotheses regarding the neural basis of the self and the theory of the mind. However, with few exceptions, these hypotheses lack reference to current research on thought processes like reasoning and decision-making. A role of the DMN in the organization and expression of preplanned, reflexive behaviors characteristics of fast thinking has been mentioned by Raichle (2015). Moreover, a link between fast and slow processes and the activity of neural circuits including the DMN, has been proposed in the framework of the Predictive And Reactive Control Systems (PARCS) theory (Tops et al., 2014). More recently, the contribution of the DMN to automated processing has been also suggested (Vatansever et al., 2017). In contrast, the dual process theory of thought is the most shared explanation of how thoughts arise but does not adequately address the neural basis of thought, although an attempt has been made to determine the relationship between ego depletion and biological parameters (Elkins-Brown et al., 2016). Thus, in our opinion the DMN may provide a neural foundation for the associative, fast, and effortless form of thinking elucidated by the dual process theory.

[1]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  E. Stein,et al.  Cingulate activation increases dynamically with response speed under stimulus unpredictability. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  David A. Lagnado,et al.  Straight Choices: The Psychology of Decision Making , 2007 .

[4]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.

[5]  J. Binder,et al.  A Parametric Manipulation of Factors Affecting Task-induced Deactivation in Functional Neuroimaging , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Maarten A. S. Boksem,et al.  Brain Substrates of Behavioral Programs Associated with Self-Regulation , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[7]  J. Antrobus INFORMATION THEORY AND STIMULUS‐INDEPENDENT THOUGHT , 1968 .

[8]  M. Inzlicht,et al.  A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect , 2016, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[9]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Thinking Fast and Slow , 2017, SIGMETRICS Perform. Evaluation Rev..

[10]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Interrupting the “stream of consciousness”: An fMRI investigation , 2006, NeuroImage.

[11]  M. Raichle The brain's default mode network. , 2015, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Dissociable Medial Prefrontal Contributions to Judgments of Similar and Dissimilar Others , 2006, Neuron.

[13]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[14]  Jonathan Evans Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin , 2004 .

[16]  S. Dewitte,et al.  Adapting to an initial self-regulatory task cancels the ego depletion effect , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  S. Epstein Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[18]  M. Tops Bored but not depleted: PRotective Inhibition of Self-regulation and Motivation (PRISM) , 2017, Cortex.

[19]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological , 2022 .

[20]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-control as limited resource: regulatory depletion patterns. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. , 2003 .

[22]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2011 .

[23]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[24]  S. Epstein,et al.  Conflict Between Intuitive and Rational Processing: When People Behave Against Their Better Judgment , 1994 .

[25]  Maarten A. S. Boksem,et al.  Large-scale neural networks and the lateralization of motivation and emotion. , 2017, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[26]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[29]  Jonathan Evans The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  S. Koole,et al.  Protective Inhibition of Self-Regulation and Motivation: Extending a Classic Pavlovian Principle to Social and Personality Functioning , 2015 .

[31]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Chris Arney Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2015 .

[33]  Sheri L. Johnson,et al.  Serotonergic function, two-mode models of self-regulation, and vulnerability to depression: what depression has in common with impulsive aggression. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Resting state fMRI: A personal history , 2012, NeuroImage.

[35]  Jonathan Evans On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning , 2007 .

[36]  S. Sloman Two systems of reasoning: An update. , 2014 .

[37]  Jonathan Evans In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A brief history of the resting state: The Washington University perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[39]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive–experiential self-theory. , 1999 .

[40]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  The serendipitous discovery of the brain's default network , 2012, NeuroImage.

[41]  M. Greicius,et al.  Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The restless mind. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  M. Osman An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Junhua Dang Commentary: A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[45]  Valerie A Thompson,et al.  Why It Matters , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[46]  Elliot T. Berkman,et al.  The neuroscience of "ego depletion": How the brain can help us understand why self-control seems limited. , 2016 .

[47]  D. Kahneman,et al.  A model of heuristic judgment , 2005 .

[48]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking , 2008, Cognition.

[49]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[50]  Maarten A. S. Boksem,et al.  Internally directed cognition and mindfulness: an integrative perspective derived from predictive and reactive control systems theory , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[51]  Evan C. Carter,et al.  A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  David K. Menon,et al.  Default mode contributions to automated information processing , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .