Public Administrators' Acceptance of the Practice of Digital Democracy: A Model Explaining the Utilization of Online Policy Forums in South Korea

The Internet provides a new digital opportunity for realizing democracy in public administration, and this study raises a central question: What factors determine public officials’ acceptance of the practice of digital democracy on government Web sites? We focused on online policy forums among many practices of digital democracy. To gauge public officials’ behavioral intentions to use online policy forums on government Web sites, we examined individual and organizational factors, as well as system characteristics. We administered a survey questionnaire to Korean public officials and analyzed a total of 895 responses. Path analysis indicates that three causal variables are important in predicting public officials’ intentions to use online policy forums: perceived usefulness, attitudes toward citizen participation, and information quality. We discuss implications of this study for practices and theories of digital democracy.

[1]  Zdenek Kotásek,et al.  I-path analysis , 1993, Proceedings ETC 93 Third European Test Conference.

[2]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation , 1978, MIS Q..

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[4]  Maria Marczewska-Rytko.  "Digital democracy. Issues of theory and practice", (ed.) K.L. Hacker, J. van Dijk, London-Thousand Oaks-New Delhi 2000, s. 228 [recenzja] , 2002 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[6]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Information Systems Implementation: Testing a Structural Model , 1990 .

[7]  D. D. Vaus,et al.  Surveys in Social Research , 1991 .

[8]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[9]  P. Julnes,et al.  Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation , 2001 .

[10]  A. Ho,et al.  Explaining the Adoption of E-Government Features , 2004 .

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  M. D. Wilkinson,et al.  Management science , 1989, British Dental Journal.

[13]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[14]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  Approaches to social research , 1993 .

[15]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Democracy on-line: An evaluation of the National Dialogue on public involvement in EPA decisions , 2002 .

[16]  Genie N. L. Stowers,et al.  User Help and Service Navigation Features in Government Web Sites , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[17]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  An exploratory investigation of the antecedents and impact of internet usage: An individual perspective , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Does the Perception of Red Tape Constrain IT Innovativeness in Organizations? Unexpected Results from a Simultaneous Equation Model and Implications , 2002 .

[19]  A. Ho.  Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government Initiative , 2002 .

[20]  Xiaohu Wang,et al.  Assessing Public Participation in U.S. Cities , 2001 .

[21]  I. Kushchu.  Mobile Government: An Emerging Direction in E-government , 2007 .

[22]  Barry N. Hague,et al.  Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age , 2005 .

[23]  James N. Danziger,et al.  Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments , 1982 .

[24]  Fernanda Fuentes,et al.  Digital Democracy. Discourse and decision making in the information age , 2001 .

[25]  C Loehlin John,et al.  Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis , 1986 .

[26]  J. Thong,et al.  CEO characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses , 1995 .

[27]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  People and computers : the impacts of computing on end users in organizations , 1985 .

[30]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[31]  Elizabeth Smythe,et al.  Globalization, citizenship and new information technologies: from the MAI to Seattle , 2004 .

[32]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Understanding Implementation: Street‐Level Bureaucrats' Resources for Reform , 2003 .

[33]  C. H. Kriebel.  Management information systems , 1970, ACM '70.

[34]  Christopher Weare,et al.  Electronic Democracy and the Diffusion of Municipal Web Pages in California , 1999 .

[35]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[36]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .

[37]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Dianne M. Finkelstein,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2005, Technometrics.

[39]  C. Hardy.  Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[40]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Usefulness of Computer-Based Information to Public Managers , 1993, MIS Q..

[41]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[42]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  Beyond information quality: fitness for purpose and electronic information resource use , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..

[43]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[44]  Roza Tsagarousianou,et al.  Electronic Democracy: Rhetoric and Reality , 1999 .

[45]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[46]  Anne Goulding,et al.  Exploring the attitudes of public library staff to the Internet using the TAM , 2004, J. Documentation.

[47]  Richard Heeks.  Reinventing Government in the Information Age , 1999 .

[48]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[49]  Karen Finlay,et al.  The Relative Roles of Knowledge and Innovativeness in Determining Librarians' Attitudes toward and Use of the Internet: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach , 1996, The Library Quarterly.

[50]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources , 2001, DATB.

[51]  W. Richard Scott.  Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems , 1981 .

[52]  Philip Calvert,et al.  Encyclopedia of Digital Government , 2008 .

[53]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[54]  J. Fountain.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[55]  広瀬 克哉,et al.  Computers and Politics--High Technology in American Local Governments/James N.Danziger,William H.Dutton,Rob Kling,Kenneth L.Kraemer(1982) , 1984 .

[56]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Training End Users: An Exploratory Study , 1987, MIS Q..

[57]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[58]  Neal M. Ashkanasy,et al.  The Effect of Organisational Culture Perceptions on the Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Managerial Job-Related Outcomes , 2001 .

[59]  D. R. Heise.  Problems in Path Analysis and Causal Inference , 1969 .

[60]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[61]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[62]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Social Design of Worklife with Computers and Networks: A Natural Systems Perspective , 1994, Adv. Comput..

[63]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test , 1993 .

[64]  Dennis F. Thompson,et al.  Democracy and Disagreement , 1996 .

[65]  D. Godschalk,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS IN ADOPTION OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS: A LOCAL GOVERNMENT CASE STUDY , 1996 .

[66]  S. Coleman,et al.  Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation , 2001 .

[67]  F. Thompson.  Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1983 .

[68]  Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin,et al.  Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[69]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[70]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Electronic Democracy at the American Grassroots , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[71]  J. Davis.  The Logic Of Causal Order , 1987 .

[72]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  An exploratory investigation of the antecedents and impact of Internet usage: an individual perspective , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[73]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Trust online , 2000, CACM.

[74]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[75]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[76]  G. Kannabiran,et al.  E-Governance and ICT Enabled Rural Development in Developing Countries: Critical Lessons from RASI Project in India , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[77]  Yining Chen,et al.  Electronic Government Implementation: A Comparison between Developed and Developing Countries , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[78]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model , 1990 .

[79]  S. Coleman.  Connecting Parliament to the Public via the Internet , 2004 .

[80]  Donald F. Norris.  Electronic Government at the American Grassroots , 2004, DG.O.