When goals are missed: Dealing with self-generated and externally induced failure

The posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC) has been consistently implicated in performance monitoring. It is assumed to signal the need for adjustments whenever the outcome of an action is worse than intended. Up to now, monitoring of self-generated errors has been in the focus of research. In everyday life, however, also external reasons such as machine malfunction may cause that an action goal is missed, such that compensatory actions are needed. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) we tested whether the pMFC is engaged not only by self-generated errors but also by failure to achieve the goal resulting from external reasons and whether performance monitoring activity differs between the two conditions. In a modified flanker task yielding sufficient numbers of self-generated errors technical malfunctions were simulated on a subset of correct trials. Malfunctions and errors led to equal fMRI signal increases in the pMFC. The activity time course differed, however; in malfunctions the maximum occurred later than in errors. Moreover, pMFC activity was stronger with increasing time needed for actions compensating the failure to achieve the action goal in the first place. The results suggest that its activity increases when selection of the compensatory action turns out to be more ambiguous and demanding. Thus, no matter of whether adjustments are needed as a result of a self-generated error or external factors, the pMFC plays a prominent role in initiating compensatory actions and in the selection of the appropriate compensation.

[1]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .

[2]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[3]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Time Course of Error Detection and Correction in Humans: Neurophysiological Evidence , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[5]  Gabriele Lohmann,et al.  Event‐related analysis for event types of fixed order and restricted spacing by temporal quantification of trial‐averaged fMRI time courses , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[7]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  How does error correction differ from error signaling? An event-related potential study , 2006, Brain Research.

[8]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Lauren M. Bylsma,et al.  The conflict adaptation effect: It’s not just priming , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[10]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Why am I unsure? Internal and external attributions of uncertainty dissociated by fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A General Statistical Analysis for fMRI Data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[12]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Katja Fiehler,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of error correction. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[14]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Simultaneous ERP and fMRI of the auditory cortex in a passive oddball paradigm , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Variants of uncertainty in decision-making and their neural correlates , 2005, Brain Research Bulletin.

[17]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[18]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Learned Predictions of Error Likelihood in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2005, Science.

[19]  M. Posner The Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention , 2020 .

[20]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  The good, the bad and the neutral: Electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli , 2006, Brain Research.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event‐related f MRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[22]  G Lohmann,et al.  LIPSIA--a new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[23]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Errors without conflict: Implications for performance monitoring theories of anterior cingulate cortex , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  J. R. Simon The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing , 1990 .

[25]  M. Walton,et al.  Interactions between decision making and performance monitoring within prefrontal cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  P. M. A. RABBITT,et al.  Error Correction Time without External Error Signals , 1966, Nature.

[27]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Knowing good from bad: differential activation of human cortical areas by positive and negative outcomes , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  W. Gehring,et al.  Medial Frontal Cortex Activity and Loss-Related Responses to Errors , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Ann-Christine Ehlis,et al.  Monitoring of Internal and External Error Signals , 2005 .

[30]  E. Schröger,et al.  Differential Contribution of Frontal and Temporal Cortices to Auditory Change Detection: fMRI and ERP Results , 2002, NeuroImage.

[31]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[32]  Rogier B. Mars,et al.  De Bruijn ERA, Mars RB, & Hulstijn W It wasn't me... or was it? How false feedback affects performance , 2004 .

[33]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[34]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[36]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[37]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Brain potentials related to self-generated and external information used for performance monitoring , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  M. Brass,et al.  Voluntary Selection of Task Sets Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006 .

[39]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  Errors, Conflicts, and the Brain , 2004 .

[40]  G. Glover Deconvolution of Impulse Response in Event-Related BOLD fMRI1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[41]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Neural correlates of error detection and error correction: is there a common neuroanatomical substrate? , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.