Deterministic quantum state transfer and remote entanglement using microwave photons

Sharing information coherently between nodes of a quantum network is fundamental to distributed quantum information processing. In this scheme, the computation is divided into subroutines and performed on several smaller quantum registers that are connected by classical and quantum channels1. A direct quantum channel, which connects nodes deterministically rather than probabilistically, achieves larger entanglement rates between nodes and is advantageous for distributed fault-tolerant quantum computation2. Here we implement deterministic state-transfer and entanglement protocols between two superconducting qubits fabricated on separate chips. Superconducting circuits3 constitute a universal quantum node4 that is capable of sending, receiving, storing and processing quantum information5–8. Our implementation is based on an all-microwave cavity-assisted Raman process9, which entangles or transfers the qubit state of a transmon-type artificial atom10 with a time-symmetric itinerant single photon. We transfer qubit states by absorbing these itinerant photons at the receiving node, with a probability of 98.1 ± 0.1 per cent, achieving a transfer-process fidelity of 80.02 ± 0.07 per cent for a protocol duration of only 180 nanoseconds. We also prepare remote entanglement on demand with a fidelity as high as 78.9 ± 0.1 per cent at a rate of 50 kilohertz. Our results are in excellent agreement with numerical simulations based on a master-equation description of the system. This deterministic protocol has the potential to be used for quantum computing distributed across different nodes of a cryogenic network.Deterministic quantum state transfer and entanglement generation is demonstrated between superconducting qubits on distant chips using single photons.

[1]  A. Wallraff,et al.  Characterizing the attenuation of coaxial and rectangular microwave-frequency waveguides at cryogenic temperatures , 2016, EPJ Quantum Technology.

[2]  Isaac L. Chuang,et al.  Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box , 1997 .

[3]  K. B. Whaley,et al.  Supplementary Information for " Observation of measurement-induced entanglement and quantum trajectories of remote superconducting qubits " , 2014 .

[4]  S. Berger,et al.  Microwave-Controlled Generation of Shaped Single Photons in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics , 2013, 1308.4094.

[5]  J. M. Gambetta,et al.  Analytic control methods for high-fidelity unitary operations in a weakly nonlinear oscillator , 2010, 1011.1949.

[6]  S. Filipp,et al.  Observation of entanglement between itinerant microwave photons and a superconducting qubit. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[7]  Luke D. Burkhart,et al.  Deterministic Remote Entanglement of Superconducting Circuits through Microwave Two-Photon Transitions. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[8]  Frank Verstraete,et al.  Entanglement versus bell violations and their behavior under local filtering operations. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[9]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Introduction to the Tenth Anniversary Edition , 2010 .

[10]  D. Matsukevich,et al.  Entanglement of remote atomic qubits. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[11]  N. Lutkenhaus,et al.  Experimental procedures for entanglement verification , 2007 .

[12]  Jens Koch,et al.  Randomized benchmarking and process tomography for gate errors in a solid-state qubit. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[13]  L. DiCarlo,et al.  Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor , 2009, Nature.

[14]  S. Wehner,et al.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.

[15]  J. Cirac,et al.  Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network , 1996, quant-ph/9611017.

[16]  Liang Jiang,et al.  On-demand quantum state transfer and entanglement between remote microwave cavity memories , 2017, 1712.05832.

[17]  P. Schindler,et al.  Atom-atom entanglement by single-photon detection. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[18]  G. Tóth,et al.  Entanglement detection , 2008, 0811.2803.

[19]  L. DiCarlo,et al.  Chip-to-chip entanglement of transmon qubits using engineered measurement fields , 2017, 1712.06141.

[20]  D. Matsukevich,et al.  Entanglement of single-atom quantum bits at a distance , 2007, Nature.

[21]  Y. Salathe,et al.  Rapid High-Fidelity Single-Shot Dispersive Readout of Superconducting Qubits , 2017, 1701.06933.

[22]  E. Togan,et al.  Generation of heralded entanglement between distant hole spins , 2015, Nature Physics.

[23]  H. J. Kimble,et al.  Measurement-induced entanglement for excitation stored in remote atomic ensembles , 2005, Nature.

[24]  John M. Martinis,et al.  Catching Time-Reversed Microwave Coherent State Photons with 99.4% Absorption Efficiency , 2013, 1311.1180.

[25]  Alexandre Blais,et al.  Antibunching of microwave-frequency photons observed in correlation measurements using linear detectors , 2011 .

[26]  P. Leek,et al.  Coherence and decay of higher energy levels of a superconducting transmon qubit. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[27]  Simon Baur,et al.  Remote entanglement between a single atom and a Bose-Einstein condensate , 2011, 2011 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe and 12th European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO EUROPE/EQEC).

[28]  D. Matsukevich,et al.  Bell inequality violation with two remote atomic qubits. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[29]  L. DiCarlo,et al.  Fast reset and suppressing spontaneous emission of a superconducting qubit , 2010, 1003.0142.

[30]  John M. Martinis,et al.  Quantum theory of a bandpass Purcell filter for qubit readout , 2015, 1504.06030.

[31]  M. Markham,et al.  Heralded entanglement between solid-state qubits separated by three metres , 2012, Nature.

[32]  J. Bell On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .

[33]  I. V. Inlek,et al.  Modular entanglement of atomic qubits using photons and phonons , 2014, Nature Physics.

[34]  R. N. Schouten,et al.  Unconditional quantum teleportation between distant solid-state quantum bits , 2014, Science.

[35]  D Hayes,et al.  Heralded quantum gate between remote quantum memories. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[36]  A. Blais,et al.  Fast and Unconditional All-Microwave Reset of a Superconducting Qubit. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[37]  H. Kimble,et al.  Functional Quantum Nodes for Entanglement Distribution over Scalable Quantum Networks , 2007, Science.

[38]  Axel Kuhn,et al.  Kuhn, Hennrich, and Rempe Reply to Comment on "Deterministic single-photon source for distributed quantum networking" , 2002 .

[39]  B. Julsgaard,et al.  Experimental long-lived entanglement of two macroscopic objects , 2001, Nature.

[40]  Daniel Sank,et al.  Fast accurate state measurement with superconducting qubits. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[41]  E. Zalys-Geller,et al.  Robust concurrent remote entanglement between two superconducting qubits , 2016, 1603.03742.

[42]  Andreas Reiserer,et al.  Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons , 2014, 1412.2889.

[43]  S. Berger,et al.  Microwave-Induced Amplitude and Phase Tunable Qubit-Resonator Coupling in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics , 2015, 1502.03692.

[44]  S. Girvin,et al.  Quantum non-demolition detection of single microwave photons in a circuit , 2010, 1003.2734.

[45]  L Frunzio,et al.  Approaching unit visibility for control of a superconducting qubit with dispersive readout. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[46]  Gardiner,et al.  Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[47]  Carmichael,et al.  Quantum trajectory theory for cascaded open systems. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[48]  D. Jaksch,et al.  Entangling Macroscopic Diamonds at Room Temperature , 2011, Science.

[49]  H. Kimble,et al.  Entanglement of spin waves among four quantum memories , 2010, Nature.

[50]  S. Girvin,et al.  Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box , 2007, cond-mat/0703002.

[51]  J Laurat,et al.  Heralded entanglement between atomic ensembles: preparation, decoherence, and scaling. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[52]  G. Rempe,et al.  An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities , 2012, Nature.

[53]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Heralded quantum entanglement between two crystals , 2011, Nature Photonics.

[54]  J M Gambetta,et al.  Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[55]  Edmund Clarke,et al.  Phase-tuned entangled state generation between distant spin qubits , 2017, 2017 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC).

[56]  Jacob M. Taylor,et al.  Distributed Quantum Computation Based-on Small Quantum Registers , 2007, 0709.4539.

[57]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[58]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Heralded Entanglement Between Widely Separated Atoms , 2012, Science.

[59]  S. Girvin,et al.  Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics , 2004, Nature.

[60]  J. Cirac,et al.  Distributed quantum computation over noisy channels , 1998, quant-ph/9803017.

[61]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a BDCZ quantum repeater node , 2008, Nature.