Unconstrained Tripolar Hip Implants: Effect on Hip Stability

Tripolar implants were developed to treat unstable total hip arthroplasties. However, there is limited confirmation that they achieve this purpose despite their increasing use. Because they have a larger effective head size, these implants are expected to increase range of motion to impingement and improve stability in situations at risk for impingement compared with conventional implants. We assessed the range of motion to impingement using a tripolar implant mounted to an automated hip simulator using 22.2-mm and 28-mm femoral head sizes. The 22 and 28-mm tripolar implants provided increases of 30.5° in flexion, 15.4° in adduction, and 22.4° in external rotation compared with the conventional 22.2-mm femoral head diameter implant. At the critical position of 90° hip flexion, there was an increase of 45.2° in internal rotation. At 0° and 30° external rotation, extension increases were 18.8° and 7.8°, respectively. Bony impingement was the limiting factor. Tripolar implants increased the arc of motion before impingement in positions at risk for dislocation and are expected to provide greater stability.

[1]  D J Schurman,et al.  Range of motion studies for total hip replacements. A comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  F. Stinchfield,et al.  THE CLASSIC: Dislocation and Instability Complicating Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip Joint , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  M. Ritter,et al.  Dislocation and subluxation of the total hip replacement. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  J. Lewis,et al.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  J. Charnley,et al.  Postoperative dislocation after Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  W. Murray,et al.  The universal proximal femoral endoprosthesis. A short-term comparison with conventional hemiarthroplasty. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  R. Poss,et al.  Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  B. Wroblewski,et al.  Revision of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty for recurrent or irreducible dislocation. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  I C Clarke,et al.  Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement. The effects of head and neck geometry. , 1982, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  B F Morrey,et al.  Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  B F Kavanagh,et al.  Multiple revisions for failed total hip arthroplasty not associated with infection. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  W H Harris,et al.  Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty. The impact of modular head-neck components. , 1991, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  W H Harris,et al.  Elevated-rim acetabular components. Effect on range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty. , 1991, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  J. Rao,et al.  Dislocations following arthroplasties of the hip. Incidence, prevention, and treatment. , 1991, Orthopaedic review.

[15]  B F Morrey,et al.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[16]  M. Ries,et al.  Bipolar hip arthroplasty for recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. A report of three cases. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  S. Leclercq,et al.  [Study of Bousquet's non-cemented acetabular implant in 100 hybrid total hip prostheses (Charnley type cemented femoral component). Average 5-year follow-up]. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[18]  H. Amstutz,et al.  Tripolar hip replacement for recurrent prosthetic dislocation. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  S. Leclercq,et al.  [Bousquet's device in the treatment of recurrent dislocation of a total hip prosthesis. Apropos of 13 cases]. , 1995, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[20]  T. Brown,et al.  Salvage of Total Hip Instability With a Constrained Acetabular Component , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  F. Farizon,et al.  Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility , 1998, International Orthopaedics.

[22]  T. Brown,et al.  Salvage of a Recurrently Dislocating Total Hip Prosthesis with Use of a Constrained Acetabular Component. A Retrospective Analysis of Fifty-six Cases* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  Robert Poss,et al.  Posterior Approach to Total Hip Replacement Using Enhanced Posterior Soft Tissue Repair , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral abductor split approach. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  F. Kummer,et al.  The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  D. D’Lima,et al.  The Effect of the Orientation of the Acetabular and Femoral Components on the Range of Motion of the Hip at Different Head-Neck Ratios* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  Philip C. Noble,et al.  The Effect of Femoral Component Head Size on Posterior Dislocation of the Artificial Hip Joint* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  D. D’Lima,et al.  Optimizing Acetabular Component Position to Minimize Impingement and Reduce Contact Stress , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  T. Brown,et al.  Experimental and computational simulation of total hip arthroplasty dislocation. , 2001, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[30]  The effect of component design on range of motion to impingement in total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, Instructional course lectures.

[31]  W. Harris,et al.  A novel constrained acetabular liner design with increased range of motion. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[32]  D J Berry,et al.  Epidemiology of instability after total hip replacement. , 2001, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[33]  R. Barrack,et al.  Virtual reality computer animation of the effect of component position and design on stability after total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[34]  D. Berry.  Unstable total hip arthroplasty: detailed overview. , 2001, Instructional course lectures.

[35]  Fumihiro Yoshimine,et al.  A mathematical formula to calculate the theoretical range of motion for total hip replacement. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Jumbo Femoral Head for the Treatment of Recurrent Dislocation Following Total Hip Replacement , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[37]  P. Pellicci,et al.  The use of a constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[38]  C. Ambrose,et al.  Constrained acetabular cups: a cadaveric biomechanical evaluation. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[39]  P. Beaulé,et al.  [Tripolar arthroplasty for recurrent total hip prosthesis dislocation]. , 2003, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[40]  P. Hölmich,et al.  Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty , 2004, Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery.