Integrating safety into the fundamental relations of freeway traffic flows: A conflict-based safety assessment framework

Abstract Numerous statistical and data-driven modeling frameworks have estimated rear-end crashes and crash-prone events from macroscopic traffic states which are at the heart of traffic flow modelling and control. However, existing frameworks focus on critical events and exclude a vast majority of safer interactions, which are essential information with respect to identifying the trade-offs between congestion management and rear-end crash prevention. This study proposes a flexible conflict-based framework to extract safety information from freeway macroscopic traffic state variables (i.e., speed and density) by utilizing the information from all underlying car-following interactions. Time spent in conflict ( TSC ) is introduced as the total time spent by all vehicles in rear-end conflicts based on a given conflict measure and a threshold to be determined flexibly. Using the NGSIM vehicle trajectory dataset, we show that the proportion of stopping distance ( PSD ) is more desirable than several event-based conflict measures (e.g., time to collision) for describing TSC based on macroscopic state variables. Besides, it is shown that PSD provides explicit safety information about the entire travel time for each macroscopic state because it applies to all car-following interactions. This paper proposes a hybrid methodological framework combining probabilistic and machine learning models to develop the relationships between safety and macroscopic state variables within a flexible conflict-based safety assessment framework. At first, probabilistic and Machine learning models are separately developed to estimate PSD -based TSC using only macroscopic stte variables. Each approach is evaluated comprehensively against empirical observations using the NGSIM vehicle trajectory dataset. While the machine learning approach has better predictive accuracy for a fixed rear-end conflict threshold (i.e., PS D cr ), the probabilistic approach has a better explaining capability and captures TSC using flexible conflict thresholds. Utilizing the advantages of these two approaches, the proposed hybrid framework satisfactorily predicts TSC corresponding to PSD P S D cr for a wide range of thresholds based only on macroscopic state variables. This paper provides an endogenous safety dimension to the fundamental relations of freeway traffic flows that can be utilized to balance freeway traffic flow efficiency and safety. For instance, control studies can utilize the proposed framework to minimize total travel time while also minimizing total time spent in conflict for crash-prone situations such as shockwaves and traffic oscillations.

[1]  Younshik Chung Identifying Primary and Secondary Crashes from Spatiotemporal Crash Impact Analysis , 2013 .

[2]  George Yannis,et al.  Impact of real-time traffic characteristics on crash occurrence: Preliminary results of the case of rare events. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Simon Washington,et al.  Applying a joint model of crash count and crash severity to identify road segments with high risk of fatal and serious injury crashes. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Implementation of Variable Speed Limits to Improve Safety of Congested Expressway Weaving Segments in Microsimulation , 2017 .

[5]  Wei Wang,et al.  Evaluation of the impacts of traffic states on crash risks on freeways. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  S. M. Sohel Mahmud,et al.  Application of proximal surrogate indicators for safety evaluation: A review of recent developments and research needs , 2017 .

[7]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Assessment of freeway traffic parameters leading to lane-change related collisions. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Automated Safety Diagnosis of Vehicle–Bicycle Interactions Using Computer Vision Analysis , 2013 .

[9]  Yang Yu,et al.  Novel Crash Surrogate Measure for Freeways , 2020 .

[10]  Fred W. Glover,et al.  Scatter Search and Local Nlp Solvers: A Multistart Framework for Global Optimization , 2006, INFORMS J. Comput..

[11]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[12]  Alexiadis,et al.  The next generation simulation program , 2004 .

[13]  Wei Wang,et al.  Safety performance of traffic phases and phase transitions in three phase traffic theory. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Yan Kuang,et al.  A tree-structured crash surrogate measure for freeways. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  From univariate to bivariate extreme value models: Approaches to integrate traffic conflict indicators for crash estimation , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[16]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  About calibration of car-following dynamics of automated and human-driven vehicles: Methodology, guidelines and codes , 2021, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[17]  Kitae Jang,et al.  Investigation of Attributes of Kinematic Waves Preceding Traffic Collisions , 2010 .

[18]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Integrated traffic conflict model for estimating crash modification factors. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Real-time crash prediction on expressways using deep generative models , 2020 .

[20]  Zhibin Li,et al.  Collisions in Freeway Traffic , 2013 .

[21]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  An Optimal Variable Speed Limits System to Ameliorate Traffic Safety Risk , 2014 .

[22]  Balázs Kulcsár,et al.  Incident Parameter Scheduled Freeway Traffic Control - a Ramp Meter Approach , 2014 .

[23]  S. Washington,et al.  A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traffic conflict techniques. , 2021, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Full Bayesian conflict-based models for real time safety evaluation of signalized intersections. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Dynamic Variable Speed Limit Strategies for Real-Time Crash Risk Reduction on Freeways , 2008 .

[26]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  Do We Really Need to Calibrate All the Parameters? Variance-Based Sensitivity Analysis to Simplify Microscopic Traffic Flow Models , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[27]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Application of Stochastic Gradient Boosting Technique to Enhance Reliability of Real-Time Risk Assessment , 2013 .

[28]  Philipp Probst,et al.  Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest , 2018, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[29]  R. Khanna,et al.  Support Vector Regression , 2015 .

[30]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Probabilistic Framework for Automated Analysis of Exposure to Road Collisions , 2008 .

[31]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  A joint framework for static and real-time crash risk analysis , 2018, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[32]  Ashish Bhaskar,et al.  Performance of continuum models for realworld traffic flows: Comprehensive benchmarking , 2021, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[33]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model , 2002 .

[34]  Ashish Bhaskar,et al.  A pattern recognition algorithm for assessing trajectory completeness , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[35]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Real-Time Crash Risk Prediction using Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[36]  Peibo Zhao,et al.  Assessing rear-end collision risk of cars and heavy vehicles on freeways using a surrogate safety measure. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Christopher J. C. Burges,et al.  A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition , 1998, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[38]  Fedel Frank Saccomanno,et al.  Assessing Safety Benefits of Variable Speed Limits , 2004 .

[39]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Big data, traditional data and the tradeoffs between prediction and causality in highway-safety analysis , 2020, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[40]  Wang,et al.  Review of road traffic control strategies , 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[41]  Zhanle Zheng,et al.  Empirical analysis on relationship between traffic conditions and crash occurrences , 2012 .

[42]  Stuart R Perkins,et al.  Traffic conflict characteristics-accident potential at intersections , 1968 .

[43]  Denver Tolliver,et al.  Decision Tree Approach to Accident Prediction for Highway–Rail Grade Crossings: Empirical Analysis , 2016 .

[44]  Soyoung Ahn,et al.  Impact of traffic oscillations on freeway crash occurrences. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[45]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Longitudinal safety evaluation of connected vehicles' platooning on expressways. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[46]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[47]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Traffic conflict models to evaluate the safety of signalized intersections at the cycle level , 2018 .

[48]  Simon Washington,et al.  Detecting, analysing, and modelling failed lane-changing attempts in traditional and connected environments , 2020 .

[49]  Michiel C.J. Bliemer,et al.  Stop or go decisions at the onset of yellow light in a connected environment: A hybrid approach of decision tree and panel mixed logit model , 2021 .

[50]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Considering various ALINEA ramp metering strategies for crash risk mitigation on freeways under congested regime , 2007 .

[51]  Ling Wang,et al.  Reducing real-time crash risk for congested expressway weaving segments using ramp metering , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[52]  Jian Sun,et al.  A dynamic Bayesian network model for real-time crash prediction using traffic speed conditions data , 2015 .

[53]  Pan Liu,et al.  Using empirical traffic trajectory data for crash risk evaluation under three-phase traffic theory framework. , 2021, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[54]  Chris Lee,et al.  Real-Time Crash Prediction Model for Application to Crash Prevention in Freeway Traffic , 2002 .

[55]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Utilizing support vector machine in real-time crash risk evaluation. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[56]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing , 2014 .

[57]  F. Mannering Temporal instability and the analysis of highway accident data , 2018 .

[58]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  A full Bayes approach for traffic conflict-based before-after safety evaluation using extreme value theory. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[59]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial , 2013, Front. Neurorobot..

[60]  Soyoung Ahn,et al.  Freeway traffic oscillations : microscopic analysis of formations and propagations using Wavelet Transform , 2011 .

[61]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Split Models for Predicting Multivehicle Crashes during High-Speed and Low-Speed Operating Conditions on Freeways , 2005 .

[62]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  Trajectory data reconstruction and simulation-based validation against macroscopic traffic patterns , 2015 .

[63]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Support-vector networks , 2004, Machine Learning.

[65]  D F Cooper,et al.  TRAFFIC STUDIES AT T-JUNCTIONS. 2. A CONFLICT SIMULATION RECORD , 1976 .

[66]  Jorge A. Laval Hysteresis in traffic flow revisited: An improved measurement method , 2011 .

[67]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  Modeling traffic conflicts for use in road safety analysis: A review of analytic methods and future directions , 2020 .

[68]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[69]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Developing an algorithm to assess the rear-end collision risk under fog conditions using real-time data , 2018 .

[70]  C. Antoniou,et al.  Prediction of rear-end conflict frequency using multiple-location traffic parameters. , 2021, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[71]  Anurag Pande,et al.  ATMS implementation system for identifying traffic conditions leading to potential crashes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[72]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Three-phase traffic theory and two-phase models with a fundamental diagram in the light of empirical stylized facts , 2010, 1004.5545.

[73]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives , 2010 .

[74]  M M Minderhoud,et al.  Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[75]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Probabilistic Collision Prediction for Vision-Based Automated Road Safety Analysis , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[76]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Understanding the Highway Safety Benefits of Different Approaches of Connected Vehicles in Reduced Visibility Conditions , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[77]  Brenda Lantz,et al.  Commercial truck crash injury severity analysis using gradient boosting data mining model. , 2018, Journal of safety research.

[78]  Jaeyoung Lee,et al.  Implementation of Active Traffic Management Strategies for Safety on Congested Expressway Weaving Segments , 2017 .

[79]  Moinul Hossain,et al.  A Bayesian network based framework for real-time crash prediction on the basic freeway segments of urban expressways. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[80]  Long T. Truong,et al.  Studying the Safety Impact of Autonomous Vehicles Using Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Measures , 2018 .

[81]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Large-Scale Automated Analysis of Vehicle Interactions and Collisions , 2010 .

[82]  Ye Li,et al.  Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[83]  Wenjing Xie,et al.  Identification of freeway secondary accidents with traffic shock wave detected by loop detectors , 2016 .

[84]  Chengcheng Xu,et al.  Identification of freeway crash-prone traffic conditions for traffic flow at different levels of service , 2014 .

[85]  Chris Lee,et al.  Analysis of Crash Precursors on Instrumented Freeways , 2002 .

[86]  J. M. del Castillo Three new models for the flow–density relationship: derivation and testing for freeway and urban data , 2012 .

[87]  Bo Yang,et al.  Real-time estimation of secondary crash likelihood on freeways using high-resolution loop detector data , 2016 .

[88]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Predicting Freeway Crashes from Loop Detector Data by Matched Case-Control Logistic Regression , 2004 .

[89]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[90]  William Young,et al.  Signal Treatments to Reduce the Likelihood of Heavy Vehicle Crashes at Intersections: Microsimulation Modeling Approach , 2010 .

[91]  Ingrid van Schagen,et al.  Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: a review. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[92]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Bayesian hierarchical modeling of the non-stationary traffic conflict extremes for crash estimation , 2019, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[93]  Pushkin Kachroo,et al.  Theory of safety surrogates using vehicle trajectories in macroscopic and microscopic settings: Application to dynamic message signs controlled traffic at work zones , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[94]  Simon Washington,et al.  Impact of real-time traffic characteristics on freeway crash occurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[95]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[96]  Matthew G Karlaftis,et al.  Identifying crash type propensity using real-time traffic data on freeways. , 2011, Journal of safety research.

[97]  Ashish Bhaskar,et al.  Is more always better? The impact of vehicular trajectory completeness on car-following model calibration and validation , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[98]  Mohammed A. Quddus,et al.  Exploring the Relationship Between Average Speed, Speed Variation, and Accident Rates Using Spatial Statistical Models and GIS , 2013 .

[99]  Jaeyoung Lee,et al.  Investigating macro-level hotzone identification and variable importance using big data: A random forest models approach , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[100]  M. Treiber,et al.  Empirical Measurement of Freeway Oscillation Characteristics , 2008 .

[101]  Brian L Allen,et al.  ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC CONFLICTS AND COLLISIONS , 1978 .

[102]  Simon Washington,et al.  Decisions and actions of distracted drivers at the onset of yellow lights. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[103]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and future directions , 2014 .

[104]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  Simulation of safety: a review of the state of the art in road safety simulation modelling. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[105]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Support Vector Regression Machines , 1996, NIPS.

[106]  Jan Larsen,et al.  On optimal data split for generalization estimation and model selection , 1999, Neural Networks for Signal Processing IX: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop (Cat. No.98TH8468).

[107]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Micro- and macro-simulation of freeway traffic , 2002 .

[108]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  Speed or spacing? Cumulative variables, and convolution of model errors and time in traffic flow models validation and calibration , 2016 .

[109]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Understanding widely scattered traffic flows, the capacity drop, and platoons as effects of variance-driven time gaps. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[110]  Dong Ngoduy,et al.  On the fundamental diagram and driving behavior modeling of heterogeneous traffic flow using UAV-based data , 2021 .

[111]  Zhang Lanfang,et al.  Modeling secondary accidents identified by traffic shock waves. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[112]  D. Ragland,et al.  Surrogate safety measure for evaluating rear-end collision risk related to kinematic waves near freeway recurrent bottlenecks. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[113]  P. J. Cooper,et al.  EXPERIENCE WITH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS IN CANADA WITH EMPHASIS ON "POST ENCROACHMENT TIME" TECHNIQUES .INTERNATIONAL CALIBRATION STUDY OF TRAFFIC CONFLICTS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATO ADVANCED RESEARCH WORKSHOP , 1984 .

[114]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[115]  Aleksandar Stevanovic,et al.  Optimization of traffic signal timings based on surrogate measures of safety , 2013 .

[116]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Impact of traffic states on freeway crash involvement rates. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[117]  Simon Washington,et al.  Understanding the mechanism of traffic hysteresis and traffic oscillations through the change in task difficulty level , 2017 .

[118]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Validating the bivariate extreme value modeling approach for road safety estimation with different traffic conflict indicators. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[119]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Incorporating human-factors in car-following models : a review of recent developments and research needs , 2014 .

[120]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  METANET: A MACROSCOPIC SIMULATION PROGRAM FOR MOTORWAY NETWORKS , 1990 .

[121]  Jeffery Archer,et al.  Indicators for traffic safety assessment and prediction and their application in micro-simulation modelling : a study of urban and suburban intersections , 2005 .