Semantic interference from distractor pictures in single-picture naming: evidence for competitive lexical selection

Picture-naming studies have demonstrated interference from semantic-categorically related distractor words, but not from corresponding distractor pictures, and the lack of generality of the interference effect has been argued to challenge theories viewing lexical selection in speech production as a competitive process. Here, we demonstrate that semantic interference from context pictures does become visible, if sufficient attention is allocated to them. We combined picture naming with a spatial-cuing procedure. When participants’ attention was shifted to the distractor, semantically related distractor pictures interfered with the response, as compared with unrelated distractor pictures. This finding supports models conceiving lexical retrieval as competitive (Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999) but is difficult to reconcile with the response exclusion hypothesis (Finkbeiner & Caramazza, 2006b) proposed as an alternative.

[1]  E Berendsen,et al.  Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[2]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production , 2003 .

[4]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  S. Tipper,et al.  Long-Term Negative Priming: Support for Retrieval of Prior Attentional Processes , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Lexical Selection is Not a Competitive Process: A Reply to La Heij et al. (2006) , 2006, Cortex.

[7]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: analyses of response time distributions. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[9]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[13]  Jan Rouke Kuipers,et al.  The limitations of cascading in the speech production system , 2009 .

[14]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Semantic and phonological activation in noun and pronoun production. , 2001, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[15]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Do perceived context pictures automatically activate their phonological code? , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[20]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. , 1995 .

[21]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Picture Naming in Picture Context: Semantic Interference or Semantic Facilitation? , 2003 .

[22]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review , 2009 .

[23]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Ease of processing constrains the activation flow in the conceptual-lexical system during speech planning. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. , 2003, Psychological review.

[26]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[27]  W. Levelt.  Models of word production , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Now You See it, Now you Don't: On Turning Semantic Interference Into Facilitation in a Stroop-Like Task , 2006, Cortex.

[30]  W. Glaser,et al.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. , 1995 .

[32]  M. Posner.  Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .

[33]  Albert Costa,et al.  Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access , 2005 .

[34]  Albert Costa,et al.  A further look at semantic context effects in language production: The role of response congruency , 2006 .

[35]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Conceptual coherence affects phonological activation of context objects during object naming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  A. Roelofs.  Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  Picture-Induced Semantic Interference Reflects Lexical Competition during Object Naming , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[40]  J. Kuipers,et al.  Object interference in children's colour and position naming: Lexical interference or task-set competition? , 2010 .