Using Porcine Cadavers as an Alternative to Human Cadavers for Teaching Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion: Proof of Concept and Anatomical Comparison

Training surgeons to perform minimally invasive spinal (MIS) surgery is difficult because there are few realistic alternatives to human cadavers which are expensive and require special handling. In this study we report a protocol for performing an MIS training course on a fresh porcine cadaver. We find that the porcine lumbar spine closely resembles the human spine in terms of the vertebral and discal anatomy. Notable differences include a lower disc height and shallower diameter. We obtained fresh porcine cadavers weighing 40-70 kg from local farmers that had been gutted and bled. We position the cadaver prone on a backboard and set up the operating room with biplanar fluoroscopy. During approach and cage insertion, we found that the tactile feedback obtained is realistic and allows surgeons to familiarize themselves with the procedure. Porcine cadavers were also an excellent tool for practicing pedicle screw fixation due to the larger pedicles. Five training courses involving eight surgeons noted that except for anatomical differences the training course was equivalent to training on human cadavers and unanimously preferred training on porcine cadavers to synthetic foam models. We conclude that porcine cadavers are a useful model for training surgeons in MIS surgery. Routine use of porcine cadavers may increase the availability of MIS surgery training.

[1]  H. Abbasi,et al.  Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF): Technical Notes and Early Results of a Single Surgeon Comparative Study , 2015, Cureus.

[2]  Paul M. Arnold,et al.  Simulation and resident education in spinal neurosurgery , 2015, Surgical neurology international.

[3]  Kendall H. Lee,et al.  Pig lumbar spine anatomy and imaging-guided lateral lumbar puncture: A new large animal model for intrathecal drug delivery , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  M. Costa,et al.  The use and effectiveness of cadaveric workshops in higher surgical training: a systematic review. , 2011, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[5]  G. J. Verkerke,et al.  Comparative anatomical dimensions of the complete human and porcine spine , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[6]  E. Perkins,et al.  A NOVEL SIMULATION MODEL FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINE SURGERY , 2009, Neurosurgery.

[7]  P. Richards,et al.  Assessment of CAOS as a training model in spinal surgery: a randomised study , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[8]  B. Ozgur,et al.  Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[9]  Hai-sheng Li,et al.  Pedicle Screw Fixation Enhances Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Porous Tantalum Cages: An Experimental Study in Pigs , 2005, Spine.

[10]  S. Yerby,et al.  Comparative Morphometry of L4 Vertebrae: Comparison of Large Animal Models for the Human Lumbar Spine , 2002, Spine.

[11]  T. Smit The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine – biomechanical considerations , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[12]  S. McGill,et al.  Intervertebral disc herniation: studies on a porcine model exposed to highly repetitive flexion/extension motion with compressive force. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.