Justifying design decisions with theory-based design principles

Although the role of theories in design research is recognized, we show that little attention has been paid on how to use theories when designing new artifacts. We introduce design principles as a new methodological approach to address this problem. Design principles extend the notion of design rationales that document how a design decision emerged. We extend the concept of design rationales by using theoretical hypotheses to support or object to design decisions. At the example of developing a new conceptual modeling grammar we demonstrate two main benefits of using design principles. First, the link between theory and design decision enables the design researcher to reason about the resulting behavior of the IT artifact prior to instantiation. Second, design principles allow deducing empirically testable hypotheses to foster the rigorous evaluation of IT artifacts.

[1]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[2]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Towards a Research Method for Theory-driven Design Research , 2009, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[3]  Kuntz Werner,et al.  Issues as Elements of Information Systems , 1970 .

[4]  Andoni Ibarra,et al.  An architectonic for science: The structuralist programm , 1987 .

[5]  Juha-Pekka Tolvanen,et al.  Managing Evolutionary Method Engineering by Method Rationale , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[7]  Daniel Pfeiffer,et al.  The BWW-Model as Method Engineering Theory , 2007, AMCIS.

[8]  Pericles Loucopoulos,et al.  A generic model for reflective design , 2000, TSEM.

[9]  Ron Weber,et al.  Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  William C. Regli,et al.  A Survey of Design Rationale Systems: Approaches, Representation, Capture and Retrieval , 2000, Engineering with Computers.

[12]  Ron Weber,et al.  Conceptual Modelling and Ontology: Possibilities and Pitfalls , 2002, ER.

[13]  Ronald D. Freeze,et al.  An Assessment of Formative and Reflective Constructs in IS Research , 2007, ECIS.

[14]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[17]  Wolfgang Balzer,et al.  An architectonic for science , 1987 .

[18]  R.J.M. Hartog,et al.  Evaluation in Design-Oriented Research , 2005 .

[19]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .

[21]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[22]  Karl R. Popper The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1977 .

[23]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[24]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[25]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  A Pattern-Based Approach for Constructing Design Theories with Conceptual Models , 2007, ECIS.

[26]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[27]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Werner Esswein,et al.  Ontology Based Method Engineering , 2005, AMCIS.