Further evaluation of a model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss.

This paper describes further tests of a model for loudness perception in people with cochlear hearing loss. It is assumed that the hearing loss (the elevation in absolute threshold) at each audiometric frequency can be partitioned into a loss due to damage to outer hair cells (OHCs) and a loss due to damage to inner hair cells (IHCs) and/or neurons. The former affects primarily the active mechanism that amplifies the basilar membrane (BM) response to weak sounds. It is modeled by increasing the excitation level required for threshold, which results in a steeper growth of specific loudness with increasing excitation level. Loss of frequency selectivity, which results in broader excitation patterns, is also assumed to be directly related to the OHC loss. IHC damage is modeled by an attenuation of the calculated excitation level at each frequency. The model also allows for the possibility of complete loss of IHCs or functional neurons at certain places within the cochlea ("dead" regions). The parameters of the model (OHC loss at each audiometric frequency, plus frequency limits of the dead regions) were determined for three subjects with unilateral cochlear hearing loss, using data on loudness matches between sinusoids presented alternately to their two ears. Further experiments used bands of noise that were either 1-equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB) wide or 6-ERBs wide, centered at 1 kHz. Subjects made loudness matches for these bands of noise both within ears and across ears. The model was reasonably accurate in predicting the results of these matches without any further adjustment of the parameters.

[1]  K J Munro,et al.  Balancing the caloric-induced nystagmus velocity with cold air and water. , 1998, British journal of audiology.

[2]  A J Houtsma,et al.  Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  R F Hess,et al.  Effects of flanking noise bands on the rate of growth of loudness of tones in normal and recruiting ears. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Thomas Baer,et al.  A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness , 1997 .

[5]  P. Woodland,et al.  A computational model of the auditory periphery for speech and hearing research. II. Descending paths. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  C Elberling,et al.  Loudness summation across frequency under masking and in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1980, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[7]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  BASIC-Program for calculating the loudness of sounds from their 1/3-oct. band spectra according to ISO 532 B , 1984 .

[8]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  E. Zwicker,et al.  A MODEL OF LOUDNESS SUMMATION. , 1965, Psychological review.

[10]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  B. Scharf,et al.  Model of loudness summation applied to impaired ears. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  B C Moore,et al.  Comparison of real and simulated hearing impairment in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing loss. , 1997, British journal of audiology.

[13]  E M Relkin,et al.  Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count? , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  M C Killion,et al.  Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: where is the "missing 6 dB"? , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands , 1961 .

[16]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[18]  H. Fletcher Relation Between Loudness and Masking , 1937 .

[19]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Acoustic Attenuation between the Ears , 1953 .

[20]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Basilar membrane nonlinearity and its influence on auditory nerve rate-intensity functions , 1990, Hearing Research.

[21]  D. D. Greenwood Critical Bandwidth and the Frequency Coordinates of the Basilar Membrane , 1961 .

[22]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Critical Band Width in Loudness Summation , 1957 .

[23]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  Mary Florentine,et al.  A model of loudness summation applied to noise-induced hearing loss , 1979, Hearing Research.

[25]  P. Bonding Critical bandwidth in loudness summation in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[26]  B C Moore Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[27]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  A R Thornton,et al.  Low-frequency hearing loss: perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.