A Community Navigation Scale for Persons With Serious Mental Illnesses.

OBJECTIVE The recovery paradigm in the context of serious mental illnesses pertains to several characteristics of community functioning, adjustment, and integration, among other constructs. Additional rating scales would be beneficial for measuring various facets of community functioning for research that is recovery oriented as opposed to symptom focused. The Community Navigation Scale was developed as part of the Opening Doors to Recovery project to address several aspects of navigating community resources. METHODS After item development, the 21-item Community Navigation Scale was used across two studies with 340 participants who had serious mental illnesses. Factor analysis revealed three potential factors, and subscales were computed. RESULTS The social and physical well-being subscale (seven items, Cronbach's α=0.82) addressed community involvement, volunteering, finding enjoyable activities, and engaging in positive health behaviors. The accessing external resources subscale (nine items, Cronbach's α=0.80) tapped one's ability to obtain needed resources, ranging from medications to housing and from small appliances to classes in the community. The home and self-maintenance subscale (five items, Cronbach's α=0.73) measured abilities around shopping, cooking, cell phone use, house cleaning, and personal grooming and hygiene. Initial validity of the subscales was suggested through correlations with the Multnomah Community Ability Scale (r=0.65, 0.55, and 0.41 for social and physical well-being, accessing external resources, and home and self-maintenance, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The Community Navigation Scale assesses dimensions of community functioning among persons with serious mental illnesses and may add to the array of research and clinical measures pertinent to recovery outcomes. Additional research on its psychometric properties is warranted.

[1]  S. Weich,et al.  How do recovery-oriented interventions contribute to personal mental health recovery? A systematic review and logic model. , 2020, Clinical psychology review.

[2]  E. Fossey,et al.  Place for being, doing, becoming and belonging: A meta‐synthesis exploring the role of place in mental health recovery , 2018, Health & place.

[3]  Marley W. Watkins,et al.  Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice , 2018 .

[4]  B. Druss,et al.  Opening Doors to Recovery: Recidivism and Recovery Among Persons With Serious Mental Illnesses and Repeated Hospitalizations. , 2015, Psychiatric services.

[5]  A. Bundy,et al.  Recovery Assessment Scale – Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Its feasibility and outcome measurement capacity , 2014, Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry (Print).

[6]  M. Compton,et al.  Community Navigation to Reduce Institutional Recidivism and Promote Recovery: Initial Evaluation of Opening Doors to Recovery in Southeast Georgia , 2014, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[7]  D. Penn,et al.  Psychosocial treatments for schizophrenia. , 2013, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[8]  Amy L. Drapalski,et al.  Issues and developments on the consumer recovery construct , 2012, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[9]  L. Dixon,et al.  Assessing recovery of people with serious mental illness: development of a new scale. , 2012, Psychiatric services.

[10]  M. Slade,et al.  Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis , 2011, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[11]  B. Druss,et al.  Opening doors to recovery: a novel community navigation service for people with serious mental illnesses. , 2011, Psychiatric Services.

[12]  R. Drake,et al.  Recovery: a dimensional approach. , 2010, Psychiatric services.

[13]  M. Salzer,et al.  Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale. , 2004, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[14]  D. Regier Mental disorder diagnostic theory and practical reality: an evolutionary perspective. , 2003, Health affairs.

[15]  B. Mcfarland,et al.  A level-of-functioning self-report measure for consumers with severe mental illness. , 2002, Psychiatric services.

[16]  F. Dickerson,et al.  Assessing clinical outcomes: the community functioning of persons with serious mental illness. , 1997, Psychiatric services.