Abstract The forecasted energy production of oil sands operations in Alberta in the year 2030 were optimised under CO2 emissions constraints, using a mixed integer linear optimisation model. The model features a variety of technologies (with and without CO2 capture), including coal and natural gas power plants, IGCC, and oxyfuel plants. Hydrogen production technologies are steam methane reforming and coal gasification. The optimization is executed at increasing CO2 emissions reduction levels, yielding unique infrastructures that satisfy the energy demands of the oil sands industry at minimal cost. The economic and environmental impacts of the optimally chosen technologies on the forecasted operations of the oil sands industry in 2030 are thus determined. The maximum CO2 emissions reduction attainable by using CCS in the oil sands industry in 2030 is 39% with respect to a business-as-usual baseline. This CO2 reduction results in an energy cost increase of roughly 20% for synthetic crude and 2% for bitumen production. CO2 reductions ranging from 0–35% can be attained by optimising the energy infrastructures, yielding energy production cost reductions between 9%–18%. The maximum CO2 intensity reduction is 46% for synthetic crude and less than 3% for bitumen. Energy conversion and CO2 capture account for the bulk of the energy costs for synthetic crude whereas transport and storage combined contribute between 2.6% and 5% over the entire range of CO2 reductions. The optimal energy production technologies are strongly dependent on the CO2 reduction targets. Power production without capture, predominantly NGCC and supercritical coal technology, is optimal at CO2 reduction levels of up to 30%. At higher CO2 reductions, only NGCC with capture and Oxyfuel plants are optimal. H2 production via coal gasification is optimal for CO2 reduction levels of 35% and lower. Above 35% reduction, steam methane reforming with capture is the dominant technology.
[1]
Edward S. Rubin,et al.
Comparative assessments of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage
,
2005
.
[2]
Eric Croiset,et al.
Technoeconomic evaluation of IGCC power plants for CO2 avoidance
,
2006
.
[3]
R. Williams,et al.
Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part B: Economic analysis
,
2005
.
[4]
Ali Elkamel,et al.
Modeling the energy demands and greenhouse gas emissions of the Canadian oil sands industry
,
2007
.
[5]
John Davison,et al.
Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2
,
2007
.
[6]
D. Simbeck,et al.
Hydrogen Supply: Cost Estimate for Hydrogen Pathways--Scoping Analysis, January 22, 2002--July 22, 2002
,
2002
.
[7]
Judith Gurney.
BP Statistical Review of World Energy
,
1985
.
[8]
D. R. Simbeck,et al.
Hydrogen costs with CO2 capture
,
2005
.
[9]
Ordorica Garcia,et al.
Development of Optimal Energy Infrastructures for the Oil Sands Industry in a CO₂-constrained World
,
2007
.
[10]
Ali Elkamel,et al.
Energy Optimization Model with CO2-Emission Constraints for the Canadian Oil Sands Industry
,
2008
.
[11]
Robert H. Williams,et al.
Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions
,
2005
.