Counteracting Acoustic Disturbances in Human Speech Communication

A signal can be said to be any information bearing unit or action carrying a message from a sender to a receiver. This definition covers a vast number of human and non-human actions, ranging from flirtation to satellite communication. This thesis deals with increasing the quality of one of the most ubiquitous human-to-human signals: Speech. Surrounding noise is a severe obstacle to relaxed speech communication. Cars, industry and many everyday machines emit high noise levels that render personal communication difficult, degrade our mental and physical ability and may cause nausea, vertigo, fatigue and temporary or permanent hearing loss. Indeed, exposure to noise of a high sound pressure level is a major contributor to often irreversible sensorineural hearing impairment, i.e. Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL). This doctoral thesis deals with three different approaches for facilitating human speech communication. First, methods for adaptively controlling acoustic feedback — commonly denoted "howling" — in hearing aids are developed and subsequently evaluated. Howling is a very common problem in hearing aids and a stable and robust feedback eliminator would serve many hearing aid users. The proposed method detects tonal components, i.e. howling, in the signal path of the hearing aid. If such a component is detected, the feedback control system invokes different countermeasures to adaptively cancel the howling. Second, a method for speech quality and intelligibility enhancement is described. Instead of focusing on noise suppression, the method acts as a speech booster: Frequency bands containing a usable amount of speech energy are boosted. All other frequency bands remain unchanged. This results in an increased Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and the elimination of background artefacts which may be present in some other noise reduction algorithms. Furthermore, speech distortion is kept to a negligible level. Finally, a compact receiver unit, based on bone conduction, is designed and evaluated. The unit is placed inside the external auditory canal of a user and picks up bone conducted speech from the user's speech organ. This solution, in combination with a pair of active hearing protectors, yields several advantages and allows the user to reliably communicate in environments where extremely high sound pressure levels are present.

[1]  E. A. G. Shaw,et al.  Acoustics of Circumaural Earphones , 1962 .

[2]  R. Speece,et al.  Subband adaptive filtering applied to acoustic feedback reduction in hearing aids , 1996, Conference Record of The Thirtieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[3]  Mattias Dahl,et al.  Adaptive Gain Equalizer for Speech Enhancement , 2002 .

[4]  W. G. Knecht Some notes on feedback suppression with adaptive filters in hearing aids , 1997, Proceedings of 1997 Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics.

[5]  Keh-Shew Lu,et al.  DIGITAL FILTER DESIGN , 1973 .

[6]  Mattias Dahl,et al.  Speech Recognition in Severely Disturbed Environments Combining Ear-Mic and Active Noise Control , 2002 .

[7]  L. Jackson Roundoff-noise analysis for fixed-point digital filters realized in cascade or parallel form , 1970 .

[8]  I. Claesson,et al.  Analog circuit implementation for speech enhancement purposes , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[9]  Kejian Chen,et al.  The Relationship of Tinnitus, Hyperacusis, and Hearing Loss , 2004, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[10]  E. J. Diethorn A low-complexity, background-noise reduction preprocessor for speech encoder , 1997, 1997 IEEE Workshop on Speech Coding for Telecommunications Proceedings. Back to Basics: Attacking Fundamental Problems in Speech Coding.

[11]  M. Kobayashi,et al.  An adaptive notch filter for eliminating multiple sinusoids with reduced bias , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Emerging Technologies for the 21st Century. Proceedings (IEEE Cat No.00CH36353).

[12]  Ephraim Speech enhancement using a minimum mean square error short-time spectral amplitude estimator , 1984 .

[13]  B. Rafaely,et al.  Active noise reducing headset – an overview , 2001 .

[14]  August Kaelin,et al.  Feedback cancellation in hearing aids: results from using frequency-domain adaptive filters , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems - ISCAS '94.

[15]  Herbert J. Oyer Relative Intelligibility of Speech Recorded Simultaneously at the Ear and Mouth , 1955 .

[16]  S. Boll,et al.  Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction , 1979 .

[17]  Mattias Dahl,et al.  IN-EAR MICROPHONE TECHNIQUES FOR SEVERE NOISE SITUATIONS , 2005 .

[18]  T. Kuhn,et al.  Hybrid in-car speech recognition for mobile multimedia applications , 1999, 1999 IEEE 49th Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.99CH36363).

[19]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Middle-ear dynamics before and after ossicular replacement. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Roger D. Chamberlain,et al.  Modeling the power consumption of audio signal processing computations using customized numerical representations , 2003, 36th Annual Simulation Symposium, 2003..

[21]  James M. Kates,et al.  Feedback cancellation in hearing aids: results from a computer simulation , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[22]  D. K. Bustamante,et al.  Measurement and adaptive suppression of acoustic feedback in hearing aids , 1989, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,.

[23]  J. Glover Adaptive noise canceling applied to sinusoidal interferences , 1977 .

[24]  Boaz Rafaely,et al.  Feedback control of sound in headrest , 1997 .

[25]  Mattias Dahl,et al.  Speech Enhancement using an Adaptive Gain Equalizer , 2003 .

[26]  M. O. Tokhi,et al.  Active noise control systems , 1987 .

[27]  Douglas A. Reynolds,et al.  Corpora for the evaluation of speaker recognition systems , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[28]  W. Bastiaan Kleijn,et al.  Gaussian mixture model based mutual information estimation between frequency bands in speech , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[29]  Ingvar Claesson,et al.  Direction of Arrival Estimation for Multiple Speakers Using Time-Frequency Orthogonal Signal Separation , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[30]  B.D. Van Veen,et al.  Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering , 1988, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[31]  T Lunner,et al.  Variations in the feedback of hearing aids. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Mattias Dahl,et al.  In-Ear Microphone Equalization Exploiting an Active Noise Control. , 2001 .

[33]  Sigfrid D. Soli,et al.  A novel approach of adaptive feedback cancellation for hearing aids , 1999, ISCAS'99. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems VLSI (Cat. No.99CH36349).

[34]  Raymond D. Black Ear‐Insert Microphone , 1957 .

[35]  K. D. Kryter Physiological acoustics and health. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Bo Esbech Feedback Cancellation in Hearing Aids , 2006 .

[37]  Mattias Dahl,et al.  SUBBAND ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK CONTROL IN HEARING AIDS WITH INCREASED USER COMFORT , 2006 .

[38]  Tetsuma Sakurai,et al.  Noise-suppressing compact microphone/receiver unit , 1998 .

[39]  Hans-Günter Hirsch,et al.  Noise estimation techniques for robust speech recognition , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[40]  A E Holmes,et al.  Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[41]  A.V. Oppenheim,et al.  Enhancement and bandwidth compression of noisy speech , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[42]  S. Thomas Alexander,et al.  Adaptive Signal Processing , 1986, Texts and Monographs in Computer Science.

[43]  Sven Nordholm,et al.  Noise Suppression Employing Short Delay Processing , 1999 .

[44]  K. Martin,et al.  Adaptive detection and enhancement of multiple sinusoids using a cascade IIR filter , 1988, 1988., IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[45]  H Levitt,et al.  Noise reduction in hearing aids: a review. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[46]  H Ono Improvement and evaluation of the vibration pick-up-type ear microphone and two-way communication device. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  R. Donaldson,et al.  Zero-crossing measurements for analysis and recognition of speech sounds , 1971 .

[48]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Transmission properties of bone conducted sound: measurements in cadaver heads. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  OiSaeng Hong,et al.  Hearing loss among operating engineers in American construction industry , 2005, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[50]  Sigisbert Wyrsch,et al.  Adaptive feedback cancelling in subbands for hearing aids , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[51]  Shigeaki Aoki,et al.  Super-compact microphone/receiver unit for noisy environments , 1999 .

[52]  S. S. Awad,et al.  Voice technology in the instrumentation of the automobile , 1988 .

[53]  A Tjellström,et al.  Hearing thresholds with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[54]  A Axelsson,et al.  Miniature microphone probe tube measurements in the external auditory canal. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  Hanseok Ko,et al.  Background noise reduction via dual-channel scheme for speech recognition in vehicular environment , 2005, 2005 Digest of Technical Papers. International Conference on Consumer Electronics, 2005. ICCE..

[56]  R. J. Oliveira,et al.  The active earcanal. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[57]  B. Widrow,et al.  Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications , 1975 .

[58]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications , 1992 .

[59]  Ingvar Claesson,et al.  A New Passive/Active Hybrid Headset for a Helicopter Application , 1999 .

[60]  Renato Nobili,et al.  How well do we understand the cochlea? , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[61]  S. Stenfelt,et al.  Linearity of sound transmission through the human skull in vivo. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  Juro Ohga,et al.  Adaptive microphone-array system for noise reduction , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[63]  Andi Vonlanthen,et al.  Hearing Instrument Technology for the Hearing Healthcare Professional , 1996 .

[64]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[65]  Patrick M. Zurek,et al.  Reducing acoustic feedback in hearing aids , 1995, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[66]  Olivier Cappé,et al.  Elimination of the musical noise phenomenon with the Ephraim and Malah noise suppressor , 1994, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[67]  Ingvar Claesson,et al.  GSM TDMA Frame Rate Internal Active Noise Cancellation , 2003 .

[68]  J. Kates Constrained adaptation for feedback cancellation in hearing aids. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[69]  R Neitzel,et al.  Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[70]  A Tjellström,et al.  Resonance frequencies of the human skull in vivo. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[71]  Sergei Kochkin Consumers Rate Improvements Sought in Hearing Instruments , 2002 .

[72]  Rainer Martin,et al.  Spectral Subtraction Based on Minimum Statistics , 2001 .

[73]  Biing-Hwang Juang,et al.  Fundamentals of speech recognition , 1993, Prentice Hall signal processing series.

[74]  John H. L. Hansen,et al.  Discrete-Time Processing of Speech Signals , 1993 .

[75]  Sigisbert Wyrsch,et al.  Subband signal processing for hearing aids , 1999, ISCAS'99. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems VLSI (Cat. No.99CH36349).

[76]  I. Claesson,et al.  Acoustic noise and echo cancelling with microphone array , 1999 .

[77]  Chunhong Liu,et al.  A spectral cues preserving compression algorithm for digital hearing aid , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[78]  Sven Nordholm,et al.  Spectral subtraction using reduced delay convolution and adaptive averaging , 2001, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[79]  E. J. Diethorn A subband noise-reduction method for enhancing speech in telephony and teleconferencing , 1997, Proceedings of 1997 Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics.

[80]  Thomas L Lagö Frequency Analysis of Helicopter Sound in the AS332 Super Puma , 1996 .

[81]  Fengmin Gong,et al.  An Adaptive Feedback Equalization Algorithm For The CID Digital Hearing Aid , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[82]  Herbert J. Oyer Relative Intensities of Sounds at Various Anatomical Locations of the Head and Neck during Phonation of the Vowels , 1957 .

[83]  Monson H. Hayes,et al.  Statistical Digital Signal Processing and Modeling , 1996 .

[84]  P. Peebles Probability, Random Variables and Random Signal Principles , 1993 .