Fractal dimensions of metropolitan area road networks and the impacts on the urban built environment

Abstract The fractal dimension of road networks emerges as a measure of the complexity of road transport infrastructures. In this study, we measured fractal dimensions of both the geometric form (i.e., the layout of the roads) and structure hierarchy (i.e., the connections among roads) of the major road networks in the largest 95 U.S. metro areas. We explained the causes of the variances in these fractal dimensions, especially the one for structure hierarchy. Further, we hypothesized the impacts of these fractal dimensions on the urban built environment and validated our hypotheses using path analysis. We found that a larger geometric fractal dimension (D g ) shows a more uniform distribution of roads over the metro area, which provides the accessibility to suburban areas and incentives to low-density development. A larger structural fractal dimension (D s ) indicates the highly-connected roads (e.g., highways) tend to join to other highly-connected roads so that most roads can be reached by a small number of neighboring roads (i.e., the small-world phenomenon). As D s increases and the small-world effect become more significant, daily vehicle miles traveled per capita (DVMT/Cap) decline. However, D s should be kept low in order to reduce the DVMT/Cap as population size increases. We consider that the low D s can contribute to more mixed, polycentric and more uniform on an urban area-wide basis. Overall, higher D g and D s of the major road network in a metro area leads to higher per capita carbon emissions of transport, and lower quality of life as population increases. In the end, we conclude that fractal dimensions can provide valuable insight into the nature of the transportation land use nexus.

[1]  James H Brown,et al.  The fractal nature of nature: power laws, ecological complexity and biodiversity. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  M Batty,et al.  Preliminary Evidence for a Theory of the Fractal City , 1996, Environment & planning A.

[3]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[4]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[5]  R. Cervero,et al.  Effects of Built Environments on Vehicle Miles Traveled: Evidence from 370 US Urbanized Areas , 2010 .

[6]  Frank Gallivan,et al.  Structural equation models of VMT growth in US urbanised areas , 2014 .

[7]  R. Easterlin Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all , 1995 .

[8]  Junmei Tang,et al.  Fractal Dimension of a Transportation Network and its Relationship with Urban Growth: A Study of the Dallas-Fort Worth Area , 2004 .

[9]  L. Pietronero,et al.  Fractal Dimension of Dielectric Breakdown , 1984 .

[10]  R. Cervero Road Expansion, Urban Growth, and Induced Travel: A Path Analysis , 2001 .

[11]  João de Abreu e Silva,et al.  Using structural equations modeling to unravel the influence of land use patterns on travel behavior of workers in Montreal , 2012 .

[12]  Guoqiang Shen,et al.  Fractal dimension and fractal growth of urbanized areas , 2002, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[13]  R. Easterlin,et al.  Modern Economic Growth and Quality of Life: Cross Sectional and Time Series Evidence , 2007 .

[14]  Massimo Riccaboni,et al.  Betweenness centrality of fractal and nonfractal scale-free model networks and tests on real networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  James D. Wickham,et al.  Accuracy of Road Density Estimates Derived from USGS DLG Data for Use in Environmental Applications , 1999 .

[16]  Zhilin Li,et al.  Fractality and Self-Similarity in the Structure of Road Networks , 2012 .

[17]  A. Clauset,et al.  Scale invariance in road networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Yanguang Chen,et al.  Fractal dimension evolution and spatial replacement dynamics of urban growth , 2012 .

[19]  Michael Batty,et al.  Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function , 1996 .

[20]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[22]  B. Mandelbrot Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[23]  Pierre Frankhauser,et al.  Fractal Dimensions of the Built-up Footprint: Buildings versus Roads. Fractal Evidence from Antwerp (Belgium) , 2013 .

[24]  Elizabeth C. Delmelle,et al.  Social satisfaction, commuting and neighborhoods , 2013 .

[25]  Arefeh Nasri,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Metropolitan-Level, County-Level, and Local-Level Built Environment on Travel Behavior: Evidence from 19 U.S. Urban Areas , 2015 .

[26]  Shlomo Havlin,et al.  Origins of fractality in the growth of complex networks , 2005, cond-mat/0507216.

[27]  Roya Etminani-Ghasrodashti,et al.  Modeling travel behavior by the structural relationships between lifestyle, built environment and non-working trips , 2015 .

[28]  P. Meakin Formation of fractal clusters and networks by irreversible diffusion-limited aggregation , 1983 .

[29]  Jen-Jia Lin,et al.  Structural Analysis of How Urban Form Impacts Travel Demand: Evidence from Taipei , 2009 .