Creating value in online communities through governance and stakeholder engagement

Abstract The spread of the internet has led to the evolution of on-line communities (OCs) as collectives of members who share common goals. Whilst many OCs involve individuals who engage voluntarily for mutual interest, commercial and government organizations engage involuntary stakeholders in their less egalitarian OCs. Although research has explored how members perceive and achieve value in voluntary OCs, exploration of the strategies used to engage stakeholders and deliver value in OCs where the membership is more diverse and less than voluntary, is required. We investigate this issue through a longitudinal case study of two OCs related to delivering government employment services. Our findings demonstrate the role of governance in fostering stakeholders' cognitive, emotional and behavioral engagement in two OCs, and related governance of the IT system that was subsequently deployed. Further, assessment of the performance outcomes, reported in terms of the primary stakeholder's objectives, indicates that value has been achieved for the mutual benefit of the OCs' multiple stakeholders. Analysis of the processes of value creation, in terms of Makadok's four causal mechanisms for generating profit, show that whilst the key stakeholder preemptively committed timelines, governance mechanisms that generated competition and flexibility (rather than restraining rivalry), and delivered competitive advantage and information asymmetry, produced value for government, service providers, jobseekers and employers.

[1]  B. Jean Mandernach Assessment of Student Engagement in Higher Education: A Synthesis of Literature and Assessment Tools , 2015 .

[2]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Aligning business and IT strategies in multi-business organizations , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Dominique Foray,et al.  Social software and strategy , 2011, ArXiv.

[4]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Creating Value in Online Communities: The Sociomaterial Configuring of Strategy, Platform, and Stakeholder Engagement , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Soumya Ray,et al.  The Central Role of Engagement in Online Communities , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  R. Brodie,et al.  Strategic drivers, anticipated and unanticipated outcomes of customer engagement , 2016 .

[7]  A. Saks Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement , 2006 .

[8]  Carla Wilkin,et al.  Creating value through governing IT deployment in a public/private-sector inter-organisational context: a human agency perspective , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Boundary Management in Online Communities: Case Studies of the Nine Inch Nails and ccMixter Music Remix Sites , 2011 .

[10]  Li Wang,et al.  Interactivity, engagement, and technology dependence: understanding users’ technology utilisation behaviour , 2017, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Roger S. Debreceny,et al.  Research on IT Governance, Risk, and Value: Challenges and Opportunities , 2013, J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  B. Schneider,et al.  The Meaning of Employee Engagement , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[13]  B. Shuck,et al.  Employee Engagement and HRD: A Seminal Review of the Foundations , 2010 .

[14]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[15]  E. Straub Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning , 2009 .

[16]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Edward Shih-Tse Wang,et al.  Forming relationship commitments to online communities: The role of social motivations , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  S. R. Hiltz Online communities , 1983 .

[19]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[20]  Richard Makadok,et al.  Invited Editorial: The Four Theories of Profit and Their Joint Effects , 2011 .

[21]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Engagement Theory: A Framework for Technology-Based Teaching and Learning. , 1998 .

[22]  Richard Makadok,et al.  The Interaction Effect of Rivalry Restraint and Competitive Advantage on Profit: Why the Whole Is Less Than the Sum of the Parts , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Building Member Attachment in Online Communities: Applying Theories of Group Identity and Interpersonal Bonds , 2012, MIS Q..

[24]  J. Barney Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[25]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005 .

[26]  Karim R Lakhani,et al.  Using the crowd as an innovation partner. , 2013, Harvard business review.

[27]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[28]  Paul Michael Di Gangi,et al.  Social Media Engagement Theory: Exploring the Influence of User Engagement on Social Media Usage , 2016, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[29]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[30]  David Stuart Robertson,et al.  Transforming a Company, Project by Project: The IT Engagement Model , 2006, MIS Q. Executive.

[31]  William A. Kahn Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work , 1990 .

[32]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[33]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Carla L. Wilkin,et al.  A Review of IT Governance: A Taxonomy to Inform Accounting Information Systems , 2010, J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[36]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[37]  Jasbir Singh Dhaliwal,et al.  Emotional and Rational Components of is Service Satisfaction and their Impact on is Service continuance , 2010, ICIS.