Offline Signature Verification Using Real Adaboost Classifier Combination of Pseudo-dynamic Features

We present an offline signature verification system using three different pseudo-dynamic features, two different classifier training approaches and two datasets. One of the most difficult problems of off-line signature verification is that the signature is just a static image while losing a lot of useful dynamic information. Three separate pseudo-dynamic features based on gray level: local binary pattern (LBP), gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) are used. The classification is performed using writer-dependent Support Vector Machine (SVMs) classifiers and Global Real Adaboost method, where two different approaches to train the classifier. In the first mode, each SVM is trained with the feature vectors obtained from the reference signatures of the corresponding user and those random forgeries for each signer while the global Adaboost classifier is trained using genuine and random forgery signatures of signers that are excluded from the test set. The fusion of all features achieves the best result of 7.66% and 9.94% equal error rate in GPDS while 7.55% and 11.55% equal error rate in CSD respectively.

[1]  Miguel A. Ferrer,et al.  Off-line Signature Verification Based on High Pressure Polar Distribution , 2008 .

[2]  Wataru Ohyama,et al.  Combination of Signature Verification Techniques by SVM , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition.

[3]  Jacques P. Swanepoel,et al.  Writer-Specific Dissimilarity Normalisation for Improved Writer-Independent Off-Line Signature Verification , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition.

[4]  Miguel Angel Ferrer-Ballester,et al.  Offline geometric parameters for automatic signature verification using fixed-point arithmetic , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Vallipuram Muthukkumarasamy,et al.  Off-line Signature Verification Using Enhanced Modified Direction Features in Conjunction with Neural Classifiers and Support Vector Machines , 2007 .

[6]  Cemal Ardil,et al.  Automatic Authentication of Handwritten Documents via Low Density Pixel Measurements , 2008 .

[7]  R Plamondon,et al.  The 2/3 power law: when and why? , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  On-Line and Off-Line Handwriting Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Jesús Francisco Vargas-Bonilla,et al.  Off-line signature verification based on grey level information using texture features , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  Mustafa Berkay Yilmaz,et al.  Offline signature verification using classifier combination of HOG and LBP features , 2011, 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB).

[11]  Jesús Francisco Vargas-Bonilla,et al.  Off-line Signature Verification Based on Gray Level Information Using Wavelet Transform and Texture Features , 2010, 2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition.

[12]  Réjean Plamondon,et al.  Automatic Signature Verification: The State of the Art - 1989-1993 , 1994, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[13]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Forgery Detection by Local Correspondence , 2001, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[14]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[15]  Juan Hu,et al.  Fusion of features and classifiers for off-line handwritten signature verification , 2011, The First Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[16]  Miguel A. Ferrer,et al.  Signature verification using local directional pattern (LDP) , 2010, 44th Annual 2010 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.

[17]  Cinthia Obladen de Almendra Freitas,et al.  The graphology applied to signature verification , 2005 .

[18]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Recovery of temporal information from static images of handwriting , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.