Tie Strength, Embeddedness, and Social Influence: A Large-Scale Networked Experiment

We leverage the newly emerging business analytical capability to rapidly deploy and iterate large-scale, microlevel, in vivo randomized experiments to understand how social influence in networks impacts consumer demand. Understanding peer influence is critical to estimating product demand and diffusion, creating effective viral marketing, and designing “network interventions” to promote positive social change. But several statistical challenges make it difficult to econometrically identify peer influence in networks. Though some recent studies use experiments to identify influence, they have not investigated the social or structural conditions under which influence is strongest. By randomly manipulating messages sent by adopters of a Facebook application to their 1.3 million peers, we identify the moderating effect of tie strength and structural embeddedness on the strength of peer influence. We find that both embeddedness and tie strength increase influence. However, the amount of physical interaction between friends, measured by coappearance in photos, does not have an effect. This work presents some of the first large-scale in vivo experimental evidence investigating the social and structural moderators of peer influence in networks. The methods and results could enable more effective marketing strategies and social policy built around a new understanding of how social structure and peer influence spread behaviors in society. This paper was accepted by Alok Gupta, special issue on business analytics.

[1]  T. Valente.  Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[2]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[3]  M. Sobel,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences , 1996 .

[4]  Rong Yan,et al.  Social influence in social advertising: evidence from field experiments , 2012, EC '12.

[5]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[6]  Scott A. Golder,et al.  Diurnal and Seasonal Mood Vary with Work, Sleep, and Daylength Across Diverse Cultures , 2011 .

[7]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[8]  Chun Liu,et al.  Social Influence Bias : A Randomized Experiment , 2014 .

[9]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  One-Way Mirrors in Online Dating: A Randomized Field Experiment , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al.  Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies , 2010, Sociological methods & research.

[11]  Jan U. Becker,et al.  Seeding Strategies for Viral Marketing: An Empirical Comparison , 2011 .

[12]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity and the Strength of Social Ties: An Online Social Network based Field Experiment , 2011 .

[13]  Joel A. Middleton,et al.  Unbiased Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect in Cluster-Randomized Experiments , 2015 .

[14]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[15]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments , 2010, SECO.

[16]  Nicholas A. Christakis,et al.  Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Thomas W. Valente.  Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[18]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[19]  Yogesh V. Joshi,et al.  New Product Diffusion with Influentials and Imitators , 2007 .

[20]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Engineering Social Contagions: Optimal Network Seeding in the Presence of Homophily , 2013 .

[21]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[22]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Pradeep Chintagunta,et al.  The Effect of Signal Quality and Contiguous Word of Mouth on Customer Acquisition for a Video-on-Demand Service , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[24]  Eytan Bakshy,et al.  Selection effects in online sharing: consequences for peer adoption , 2013, EC '13.

[25]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Graph cluster randomization: network exposure to multiple universes , 2013, KDD.

[26]  G. Lilien,et al.  A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing , 2008 .

[27]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Information in Digital, Economic and Social Networks , 2012 .

[28]  Dylan Walker,et al.  Identifying Social Influence in Networks Using Randomized Experiments , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[29]  Patricia E. Tweet.  Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[30]  G. Lilien,et al.  Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  M. Kearns,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Coloring Problem on Human Subject Networks , 2006, Science.

[32]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  Learning from the behavior of others : conformity, fads, and informational cascades , 1998 .

[33]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[34]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[35]  Winter A. Mason,et al.  Collaborative learning in networks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Peeter W. J. Verlegh,et al.  The Firm's Management of Social Interactions , 2005 .

[37]  Peter M. Aronow,et al.  Estimating Average Causal Effects Under General Interference , 2012 .

[38]  M. Gilly,et al.  A dyadic study of interpersonal information search , 1998 .

[39]  Juanjuan Zhang,et al.  Growing Two-Sided Networks by Advertising the User Base: A Field Experiment , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[40]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[42]  Ying Xie,et al.  The Role of Targeted Communication and Contagion in Product Adoption , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[43]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Research Commentary - Information in Digital, Economic, and Social Networks , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  One-Way Mirrors and Weak-Signaling in Online Dating: A Randomized Field Experiment - Online E-Companion Appendix , 2013, ICIS.

[45]  Edoardo M. Airoldi,et al.  Network sampling and classification: An investigation of network model representations , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[46]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks , 2012, Science.

[47]  J. Kleinberg,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets , 2010 .

[48]  Katharine Armstrong,et al.  Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think , 2014 .

[49]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences , 1996 .

[50]  Damon Centola.  Damon Centola Behavior An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health , 2011 .

[51]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Social science: Poked to vote , 2012, Nature.

[52]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[53]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[54]  Marshall Van Alstyne,et al.  The Diversity-Bandwidth Tradeoff , 2010 .

[55]  J. Arndt.  Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product , 1967 .

[56]  James F. Engel,et al.  Word-of-mouth Communication by the Innovator , 1969 .

[57]  M. Mobius,et al.  How Much is a Friend Worth? Directed Altruism and Enforced Reciprocity in Social Networks , 2007 .

[58]  Dylan Walker,et al.  Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks , 2010, ICIS.

[59]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[60]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Social Influence: A Comment on Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[61]  Juanjuan Zhang,et al.  How Does Popularity Information Affect Choices? A Field Experiment , 2009 .

[62]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[63]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  Are Paid Subscriptions on Music Social Networks Contagious ? A Randomized Field Experiment , 2011 .

[64]  Jonathan K. Frenzen,et al.  Purchasing Behavior in Embedded Markets , 1990 .

[65]  Mara M. Wenzler.  The Role of Social Networks , 2010 .

[66]  Catherine E. Tucker.  Identifying Formal and Informal Influence in Technology Adoption with Network Externalities , 2008 .

[67]  Viktor Mayer-Schnberger,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2013 .

[68]  N. Eagle,et al.  Network Diversity and Economic Development , 2010, Science.

[69]  Damon Centola.  An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior , 2011, Science.

[70]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The role of social networks in information diffusion , 2012, WWW.

[71]  D. Meadows-Klue.  The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[72]  J. Coleman,et al.  The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians , 1957 .

[73]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[74]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  Social Transmission, Emotion, and the Virality of Online Content , 2010 .

[75]  Juanjuan Zhang,et al.  The Sound of Silence: Observational Learning in the U.S. Kidney Market , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[76]  R. Burt.  Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2005 .

[77]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[78]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[79]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[80]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[81]  David G. Rand,et al.  The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games. , 2011, Nature communications.

[82]  David Easley,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets - Reasoning About a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[83]  Yadira Espinal.  Viktor Mayer-Schonberger and Kenneth Cukier, Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think , 2013 .

[84]  J. Coleman.  FREE RIDERS AND ZEALOTS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS , 1988 .

[85]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[86]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  Structural diversity in social contagion , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.