EcoVeg: a new approach to vegetation description and classification

A vegetation classification approach is needed that can describe the diversity of terrestrial ecosystems and their transformations over large time frames, span the full range of spatial and geographic scales across the globe, and provide knowledge of reference conditions and current states of ecosystems required to make decisions about conservation and resource management. We summarize the scientific basis for EcoVeg, a physiognomic-floristic-ecological classification approach that applies to existing vegetation, both cultural (planted and dominated by human processes) and natural (spontaneously formed and dominated by nonhuman ecological processes). The classification is based on a set of vegetation criteria, including physiognomy (growth forms, structure) and floristics (compositional similarity and characteristic species combinations), in conjunction with ecological characteristics, including site factors, disturbance, bioclimate, and biogeography. For natural vegetation, the rationale for the upper le...

[1]  W. Baker,et al.  Testing the accuracy of new methods for reconstructing historical structure of forest landscapes using GLO survey data , 2011 .

[2]  J. Schultz.  The ecozones of the world , 1995 .

[3]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[4]  H. Delcourt,et al.  Long-Term Forest Dynamics of the Temperate Zone: A Case Study of Late-Quaternary Forests in Eastern North America , 1989 .

[5]  E. Hadač.  On the highest units in the system of plant communities , 1967, Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica.

[6]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[7]  Jesslyn F. Brown,et al.  Development of a land-cover characteristics database for the conterminous U.S. , 1991 .

[8]  H. Birks,et al.  What Is Natural? The Need for a Long-Term Perspective in Biodiversity Conservation , 2006, Science.

[9]  R. D. Ramsey,et al.  Mapping moderate-scale land-cover over very large geographic areas within a collaborative framework : A case study of the Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project (SWReGAP) , 2007 .

[10]  R. Boyce,et al.  Choosing the best similarity index when performing fuzzy set ordination on binary data , 2001 .

[11]  V. Westhoff,et al.  Problems and use of structure in the classification of vegetation. The diagnostic evaluation of structure in the Braun-Blanquet system , 1966 .

[12]  Suming Jin,et al.  Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States – Representing a Decade of Land Cover Change Information , 2015 .

[13]  S. R. Martínez.  Syntaxonomical synopsis of the potential natural plant communities of North America, I: (Compedio sintaxonómico de la vegetación natural potencial de Norteamérica, I) , 1997 .

[14]  E. Maarel,et al.  Circumpolar arctic vegetation: Introduction and perspectives , 1994 .

[15]  Don Faber-Langendoen,et al.  Standards for associations and alliances of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification , 2009 .

[16]  C. Lowe,et al.  A Digitized Classification System for the Biotic Communities of North American, With Community (Series) and Association Examples for the Southwest , 1982 .

[17]  M. Costa,et al.  North American Boreal and Western temperate forest vegetation: (Syntaxonomical synopsis of the potential natural plant communities of North America, II) , 1999 .

[18]  P. Comer,et al.  A New Map of Standardized Terrestrial Ecosystems of Africa , 2013 .

[19]  Milan Chytrý,et al.  Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity , 2009 .

[20]  J. Oldeland,et al.  The Global Index of Vegetation-Plot Databases (GIVD): a new resource for vegetation science , 2011 .

[21]  Bruce W. Hoagland,et al.  The Vegetation of Oklahoma: A Classification for Landscape Mapping and Conservation Planning , 2000 .

[22]  Jeffrey J. Gerwing.  Life history diversity among six species of canopy lianas in an old-growth forest of the eastern Brazilian Amazon , 2004 .

[23]  K. Hoberg,et al.  Global overview , 2014, Nature.

[24]  L. Holdridge.  Determination of World Plant Formations From Simple Climatic Data. , 1947, Science.

[25]  I. Thompson,et al.  An Operational framework for defining and monitoring forest degradation , 2013 .

[26]  J. Morrison,et al.  Distribution mapping of world grassland types , 2014 .

[27]  G. D. Fuller.  Vegetation of South Africa , 1917, Botanical Gazette.

[28]  R. DeFries,et al.  A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests , 2006 .

[29]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data , 2000 .

[30]  M. Barbour,et al.  Vernal pool vegetation of California: communities of long-inundated deep habitats , 2005 .

[31]  Percy Groom,et al.  Oecology of Plants; An Introduction to the Study of Plant-Communities , 2007 .

[32]  P. Greig-Smith,et al.  Plant Communities: Textbook of Plant Synecology. , 1971 .

[33]  M. T. Mentis,et al.  Hypothetico-deductive and inductive approaches in ecology , 1988 .

[34]  Milan Chytrý,et al.  Vegetation of the Czech Republic: diversity, ecology, history and dynamics , 2012 .

[35]  M. Peinado,et al.  Vegetation formations and associations of the zonobiomes along the North American Pacific coast: from northern California to Alaska , 1997, Plant Ecology.

[36]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world , 2008 .

[37]  E. A. Clark,et al.  Plant Functional Types. Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change , 1998 .

[38]  M. Werger,et al.  Comparison of floristic and structural classification of vegetation , 2004, Vegetatio.

[39]  Mike P. Austin,et al.  Continuum Concept, Ordination Methods, and Niche Theory , 1985 .

[40]  A. Kuchler.  NATURAL AND CULTURAL VEGETATION , 1969 .

[41]  J. H. Archibald,et al.  Field Guide to Ecosites of West-Central Alberta , 2002 .

[42]  Don Faber-Langendoen,et al.  VegBank – a permanent, open-access archive for vegetation-plot data , 2012 .

[43]  E. Box,et al.  Vegetation Types and Their Broad‐scale Distribution , 2013 .

[44]  Milan Chytrý,et al.  Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation , 2003 .

[45]  H. Dierschke.  SYNTAXOMOMICAL SURVEY O F EUROPEAN BEECH FORESTS: SOME GENERAL CONCLUSIONS , 1997 .

[46]  Karel B oublík,et al.  Calcicolous beech forests and related vegetation in the Czech Republic: a comparison of formalized classifications Vápnomilné bučiny České republiky a příbuzná vegetace - srovnání formalizovaných klasifikací , 2007 .

[47]  L. Sancho,et al.  Biogeographic Map of South America. A preliminary survey. , 2011 .

[48]  J. Proctor,et al.  Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East. , 1977 .

[49]  o. Prof. em. Dr. h. c. Heinrich Walter,et al.  Vegetation of the Earth and Ecological Systems of the Geobiosphere , 1983, Heidelberg Science Library.

[50]  D. Faber-Langendoen,et al.  Monitoring and evaluating the ecological integrity of forest ecosystems , 2009 .

[51]  P. Legendre,et al.  SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH , 1997 .

[52]  Ben Collen,et al.  Establishing IUCN Red List Criteria for Threatened Ecosystems , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[53]  Joop H.J. Schaminée,et al.  Vegetation survey: A new focus for applied vegetation science , 2011 .

[54]  D. Meidinger,et al.  Biogeoclimatic ecosystem classification in British Columbia , 1987 .

[55]  Todd Keeler-Wolf,et al.  A Manual of California Vegetation , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[56]  Zoltán Botta-Dukát,et al.  Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures , 2002 .

[57]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Scientific Foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  Milan Chytrý,et al.  Effects of plot size on the ordination of vegetation samples , 2006 .

[59]  P. Comer,et al.  ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS OF LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN A WORKING CLASSIFICATION OF TERRESTRIAL SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[60]  C. W. Thornthwaite.  An approach toward a rational classification of climate. , 1948 .

[61]  D. Richardson,et al.  Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order , 2006 .

[62]  A. Gillison,et al.  Plant Functional Types and Traits at the Community, Ecosystem and World Level , 2013 .

[63]  Martin Kent,et al.  Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach , 1992 .

[64]  Helge Bruelheide,et al.  A new measure of fidelity and its application to defining species groups , 2000 .

[65]  J. Dengler,et al.  Species constancy depends on plot size – a problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved , 2009 .

[66]  P. Marks,et al.  Agricultural legacies in forest environments: tree communities, soil properties, and light availability. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[67]  Ladislav Mucina,et al.  Biomes and bioregions of Southern Africa , 2006 .

[68]  Joop H.J. Schaminée,et al.  On the concept of vegetation class in phytosociology , 1995 .

[69]  R. Keane,et al.  The use of historical range and variability (HRV) in landscape management , 2009 .

[70]  A phytosociological and phytogeographical survey of the coastal vegetation of western North America: beach and dune vegetation from Baja California to Alaska , 2011 .

[71]  P. White,et al.  A Flexible, Multipurpose Method for Recording Vegetation Composition and Structure , 1998 .

[72]  B. Blair.  Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties.Second Edition.ByJ Philip Grime.Chichester (United Kingdom) and New York: John Wiley & Sons.$55.00 (paper). xxxvii + 417 p; ill.; species list and index. ISBN: 0–471–49601–4. 2001. , 2003 .

[73]  E. Box.  Vegetation analogs and differences in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres: A global comparison , 2002, Plant Ecology.

[74]  Handbook of Vegetation Science. Part V. Ordination and Classification of Communities. aw Robert H. Whittaker tw Part VIII. Vegetation Dynamics. aw R. Knapp , 1975 .

[75]  Robert K. Peet,et al.  A Decade of Effort by the ESA Vegetation Panel Leads to a New Federal Standard , 2008 .

[76]  F. Putz,et al.  Grass-dominated vegetation, not species-diverse natural savanna, replaces degraded tropical forests on the southern edge of the Amazon Basin , 2011 .

[77]  L. J. Webb,et al.  Studies in the numerical analysis of complex rain-forest communities. V. A comparison of the properties of floristic and physiognomic/structural data. , 1970 .

[78]  T. N. Shiflet.  Rangeland cover types of the United States. , 1994 .

[79]  T. Spribille.  The mountain forests of british columbia and the american northwest: Floristic patterns and syntaxonomy , 2002, Folia Geobotanica.

[80]  M. Araújo,et al.  The concept of potential natural vegetation: an epitaph? , 2010 .

[81]  T. Herben.  E. O. Box Macroclimate and plant Forms: An introduction to predictive modeling in phytogeography , 1983, Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica.

[82]  E. D. Wells.  Classification of peatland vegetation in Atlantic Canada , 1996 .

[83]  Guangsheng Zhou,et al.  Distribution, species diversity and life-form spectra of plant communities along an altitudinal gradient in the northern slopes of Qilianshan Mountains, Gansu, China , 2003, Plant Ecology.

[84]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  The Vegetation of Wisconsin: An Ordination of Plant Communities. , 1960 .

[85]  M. Austin.  Vegetation and Environment: Discontinuities and Continuities , 2013 .

[86]  David W. Roberts,et al.  BUILDING THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION , 2012 .

[87]  S. Milton,et al.  Introduced and Invasive Species in Novel Rangeland Ecosystems: Friends or Foes? , 2012 .

[88]  Á. Penas,et al.  Biogeographic Map of South America. An initial advance , 2011 .

[89]  R. Lincoln,et al.  A dictionary of ecology, evolution, and systematics , 1982 .

[90]  Wolfgang Willner,et al.  The association concept revisited , 2006 .

[91]  Miquel De Cáceres,et al.  Towards consistency in vegetation classification , 2012 .

[92]  B. Beckage,et al.  A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green Mountains of Vermont , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[93]  Robert G. Bailey,et al.  Explanatory Supplement to Ecoregions Map of the Continents , 1989, Environmental Conservation.

[94]  Robert K. Peet,et al.  Classification of Natural and Semi‐natural Vegetation , 2013 .

[95]  D. Moss,et al.  The Diversity of European Vegetation: an overview of phytosociological alliances and their relationships to EUNIS habitats , 2002 .

[96]  Don Faber-Langendoen,et al.  Contours of the Revised U.S. National Vegetation Classification Standard , 2009 .

[97]  Z. Botta‐Dukát.  Invasion of alien species to Hungarian (semi-)natural habitats. , 2008 .

[98]  Milan Chytrý,et al.  Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures , 2002 .

[99]  Standardized Ecological Classification for Mesoscale Mapping in the Southwestern United States , 2007 .

[100]  T. Webb,,et al.  Late Quaternary biomes of Canada and the eastern United States , 2000 .

[101]  Arthur Cronquist,et al.  Floristic Regions of the World , 1978 .

[102]  N. Gotelli.  Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale , 2003 .

[103]  L. Mucina.  Conspectus of classes of European vegetation , 1997, Folia Geobotanica.

[104]  Brandon T Bestelmeyer,et al.  Land Management in the American Southwest: A State-and-Transition Approach to Ecosystem Complexity , 2004, Environmental management.

[105]  M. Chytrý.  Phytosociological data give biased estimates of species richness , 2001 .

[106]  Rob H. G. Jongman,et al.  A high-resolution bioclimate map of the world: a unifying framework for global biodiversity research and monitoring , 2013 .

[107]  R. Tiner.  Lists of potential hydrophytes for the United States: A regional review and their use in wetland identification , 2006, Wetlands.

[108]  C. Raunkiær,et al.  The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography , 1934 .

[109]  J. Leonard,et al.  The Vegetation of Africa , 1984 .

[110]  D. Faber-Langendoen,et al.  Classification and description of world formation types , 2016 .

[111]  P. White,et al.  On the existence of ecological communities , 1994 .

[112]  Lee E. Frelich,et al.  Forest Dynamics and Disturbance Regimes: Studies from Temperate Evergreen-Deciduous Forests , 2002 .

[113]  I. Hiscock.  Communities and Ecosystems , 1970, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[114]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  Paleoecology and the Coarse-Filter Approach to Maintaining Biological Diversity , 1988 .

[115]  Steven E. Hanser,et al.  The human footprint in the west: a large-scale analysis of anthropogenic impacts. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[116]  P. Redfearn,et al.  The Description and Classification of Vegetation , 1973 .

[117]  Broome,et al.  Literature cited , 1924, A Guide to the Carnivores of Central America.

[118]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  A dictionary of biology , 1951 .

[119]  R. Specht,et al.  Conservation of Major Plant Communities in Australia and Papua New Guinea , 1974 .

[120]  Milan Chytrý,et al.  Diagnostic, constant and dominant species of vegetation classes and alliances of the Czech Republic: a statistical revision , 2003 .

[121]  W. D. Billings,et al.  North American Terrestrial Vegetation , 1988 .

[122]  John L Stoddard,et al.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[123]  Alan S. Weakley,et al.  International classification of ecological communities: terrestrial vegetation of the United States , 1995 .

[124]  Javier Loidi,et al.  Potential natural vegetation: reburying or reboring? , 2012 .

[125]  Jonathan V. Higgins,et al.  A Freshwater Classification Approach for Biodiversity Conservation Planning , 2005 .

[126]  Jason D. Fridley,et al.  Biogeographic synthesis of secondary succession rates in eastern North America , 2010 .

[127]  F. Mitchell.  How open were European primeval forests? Hypothesis testing using palaeoecological data , 2005 .

[128]  J. Tricart.  Sur les méthodes phytogéographiques : Whittaker (R.), editor, 1973, Ordination and classification of communities. Handbook of Vegetation Science , 1975 .

[129]  Zoltán Botta-Dukát,et al.  OptimClass: Using species‐to‐cluster fidelity to determine the optimal partition in classification of ecological communities , 2010 .

[130]  F. H. Eyre,et al.  Forest cover types of the United States and Canada , 1980 .

[131]  Julio L. Betancourt,et al.  APPLIED HISTORICAL ECOLOGY: USING THE PAST TO MANAGE FOR THE FUTURE , 1999 .

[132]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Classification of natural communities , 2008, The Botanical Review.

[133]  V. Pillar,et al.  Atlantic rain forest recovery: successional drivers of floristic and structural patterns of secondary forest in Southern Brazil , 2014 .

[134]  K. Schulz,et al.  ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS OF THE UNITED STATES A WORKING CLASSIFICATION OF U . S . TERRESTRIAL SYSTEMS � � � � � , 2003 .

[135]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant functional types : their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change , 1998 .