Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups

This study estimates the combined direct and indirect rebound effects from various types of energy efficiency improvement and behavioural change by UK households and explores how these effects vary with total expenditure. The methodology is based upon estimates of the expenditure elasticity and GHG intensity of 16 categories of goods and services, and allows for the capital cost and embodied emissions of the energy efficiency measures themselves. The study finds that rebound effects, in GHG terms, are modest (0–32%) for measures affecting domestic energy use, larger (25–65%) for measures affecting vehicle fuel use and very large (66–106%) for measures that reduce food waste. Furthermore, measures undertaken by low income households are associated with the largest rebound effects, with direct emissions forming a larger proportion of the total rebound effect for those households. Measures that are subsidised or affect highly taxed energy commodities may be less effective in reducing aggregate emissions. These findings highlight the importance of allowing for rebound effects within policy appraisals, as well as reinforcing the case for economy-wide carbon pricing.

[1]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Carbon trading in the policy mix , 2003 .

[2]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review , 2009 .

[3]  Kenichi Mizobuchi,et al.  An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs , 2008 .

[4]  B. Boardman,et al.  Making cold homes warmer: the effect of energy efficiency improvements in low-income homes A report to the Energy Action Grants Agency Charitable Trust , 2000 .

[5]  J. Muellbauer,et al.  Economics and consumer behavior , 1980 .

[6]  Inês L. Azevedo,et al.  Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input–output analysis Part 1: Theoretical framework , 2013 .

[7]  A. Wright,et al.  Targeting household energy-efficiency measures using sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[8]  S. Sorrell.  Mapping rebound effects from sustainable behaviours: key concepts and literature review , 2010 .

[9]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Economic, energy and greenhouse emissions impacts of some consumer choice, technology and government outlay options , 2002 .

[10]  S. J. Prais,et al.  The analysis of family budgets , 1955 .

[11]  S. J. Prais,et al.  The Analysis of Family Budgets , 1956 .

[12]  R. Brännlund,et al.  Increased Energy Efficiency and the Rebound Effect: Effects on consumption and emissions , 2004 .

[13]  Bastien Girod,et al.  GHG reduction potential of changes in consumption patterns and higher quality levels: Evidence from Swiss household consumption survey , 2009 .

[14]  A. Leicester,et al.  The wealth and saving of UK families on the eve of the crisis , 2010 .

[15]  Steve Sorrell,et al.  White certificate schemes: Economic analysis and interactions with the EU ETS , 2009 .

[16]  Karen Turner,et al.  “Rebound” Effects from Increased Energy Efficiency: A Time to Pause and Reflect , 2013 .

[17]  Tim Jackson,et al.  The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input–output model , 2009 .

[18]  K. Kratena,et al.  The Full Impact of Energy Efficiency on Households' Energy Demand , 2010 .

[19]  A. Druckman,et al.  Household energy consumption in the UK: A highly geographically and socio-economically disaggregated model , 2008 .

[20]  Runa Nesbakken,et al.  Energy Consumption for Space Heating: A Discrete-Continuous Approach , 2001 .

[21]  Harro van Asselt,et al.  Addressing competitiveness and leakage concerns in climate policy: An analysis of border adjustment measures in the US and the EU , 2010 .

[22]  M. Haque.  Income Elasticity and Economic Development: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[23]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  The relative greenhouse gas impacts of realistic dietary choices , 2012 .

[24]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Rebound Effects in German Residential Heating: Do Ownership and Income Matter? , 2011 .

[25]  Harry D. Saunders,et al.  Is what we think of as ‘‘rebound’’ really just income effects in disguise? , 2013 .

[26]  Angela Druckman,et al.  Measuring progress towards Carbon Reduction in the UK. Paper presented to the International Ecological Footprint Conference. , 2007 .

[27]  E. C. Alfredsson,et al.  “Green” consumption—no solution for climate change , 2004 .

[28]  C. Leser.  Forms of Engel functions , 1963 .

[29]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households , 2010, Energy Policy.

[30]  Ferran Sancho,et al.  1 RETHINKING ECONOMY-WIDE REBOUND MEASURES : AN UNBIASED PROPOSAL , 2010 .

[31]  S. Sorrell.  The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency , 2007 .

[32]  Sung H. Hong,et al.  The impact of energy efficient refurbishment on the space heating fuel consumption in English dwellings , 2006 .

[33]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Development of an embedded carbon emissions indicator: Producing a time series of input-output tables and embedded carbon dioxide emissions for the UK by using a MRIO data optimisation system , 2008 .

[34]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UKhouseholds , 2012 .

[35]  Karen Turner,et al.  Rebound and disinvestment effects in refined oil consumption and supply resulting from an increase in energy efficiency in the Scottish commercial transport sector , 2009 .

[36]  Cameron K. Murray.  What if consumers decided to all 'go green'? Environmental rebound effects from consumption decisions , 2013 .