Hidden Markov model analysis reveals better eye movement strategies in face recognition

Here we explored eye movement strategies that lead to better performance in face recognition with hidden Markov models (HMMs). Participants performed a standard face recognition memory task with eye movements recorded. The durations and locations of the fixations were analyzed using HMMs for both the study and the test phases. Results showed that in the study phase, the participants who looked more often at the eyes and shifted between different regions on the face with long fixation durations had better performances. The test phase analyses revealed that an efficient, short first orienting fixation followed by a more analytic pattern focusing mainly on the eyes led to better performances. These strategies could not be revealed by analysis methods that do not take individual differences in both temporal and spatial dimensions of eye movements into account, demonstrating the power of the HMM approach.

[1]  Tim Chuk,et al.  Caucasian and Asian eye movement patterns in face recognition: A computational exploration using hidden Markov models , 2014 .

[2]  G. Cottrell,et al.  Two Fixations Suffice in Face Recognition , 2008, Psychological science.

[3]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Is there an innate gaze module? Evidence from human neonates , 2000 .

[4]  B. Velichkovsky,et al.  Time course of information processing during scene perception: The relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration , 2005 .

[5]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[6]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Eye movements are functional during face learning , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[8]  C. J. Erkelens,et al.  Control of fixation duration in a simple search task , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  R. Caldara,et al.  Developing cultural differences in face processing. , 2011, Developmental science.

[10]  W. Becker,et al.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[11]  Tim Chuk,et al.  Understanding eye movements in face recognition using hidden Markov models. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[12]  John Colombo,et al.  Individual differences in infant fixation duration: Dominance of global versus local stimulus properties , 1995 .

[13]  Susanne Huber,et al.  Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[14]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual perceptual processing rates and backward and forward masking. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Antoni B. Chan,et al.  Clustering hidden Markov models with variational HEM , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  Robert F. Asarnow,et al.  Continuity in cognitive abilities from infancy to 12 years of age , 1991 .

[17]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Two Fixations Suffice in Face , 2008 .