Reliability of progressive and additive MRI scoring systems for evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy in children: Expert MRI Working Group of the International Prophylaxis Study Group

Summary.  Effective treatment of haemophilic arthropathy requires a detailed evaluation of joint integrity. Methodological assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores are needed to assure reproducibility of measurements when comparing results of clinical trials conducted in different centres. We compared the reliability of two MRI scoring systems for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy: one progressive system that displays the most severe change and one additive system that depicts osteochondral and soft tissue‐related changes. A total of 47 1.5 T MRI examinations of knees (n = 21) and ankles (n = 26) of 42 haemophilic boys, age range, 22 months to 18 years, performed at different centres (Toronto, n = 20, Europe, n = 12 and Denver, n = 15) were independently reviewed by four radiologists at two occasions. Twenty‐two examinations were from children <9 years and 25 from children ≥9. Sagittal and coronal gradient‐echo (MPGR, 3D FLASH with fat saturation, GRASS) images were obtained. The MRI examinations of the ankle and knee studies presented with osteochondral abnormalities in 38.5% and 23.8% of the cases respectively. The two scoring systems demonstrated an excellent inter‐reader [progressive, 0.88; additive (A, e, s and h components), 0.86] and intra‐reader [progressive, 0.92; additive (A, e, s and h components), 0.93] reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Although ICCs were slightly higher for knees when compared with ankles, and for older children when compared with younger children, all values fell within excellent inter‐ and intra‐reader reliability categories. The two MRI scoring systems demonstrated a comparable reliability. This result constitutes the basis for further development of a combined MRI scoring system for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy, which incorporates progressive and additive components.

[1]  P. Babyn,et al.  Compatible scales for progressive and additive MRI assessments of haemophilic arthropathy , 2005, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[2]  R. Ljung,et al.  A new magnetic resonance imaging scoring method for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy , 2004, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[3]  Michael L. Wang,et al.  Thalidomide with or without dexamethasone for refractory or relapsing multiple myeloma. , 2003, Seminars in hematology.

[4]  M. Manco‐Johnson.  Update on treatment regimens: prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy. , 2003, Seminars in hematology.

[5]  R. Kerr.  Imaging of Musculoskeletal Complications of Hemophilia , 2003, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[6]  A. Ferrández,et al.  Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis and follow‐up of haemophilic arthropathy , 2003, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[7]  W. Kreuz,et al.  Bewertung der hämophilen Arthropathie: MRT- und Pettersson Score im Vergleich , 2002 .

[8]  R. Nuss,et al.  Late clinical, plain X‐ray and magnetic resonance imaging findings in haemophilic joints treated with radiosynoviorthesis , 2000, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[9]  M. Manco‐Johnson,et al.  MRI findings in haemophilic joints treated with radiosynoviorthesis with development of an MRI scale of joint damage , 2000, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[10]  S. Walter,et al.  Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  M. Manco‐Johnson,et al.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for management of hemophilic arthropathy in children. , 1993, The Journal of pediatrics.

[12]  F. Hoffer,et al.  Cartilaginous epiphysis and growth plate: normal and abnormal MR imaging findings. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[14]  H. Pettersson,et al.  A radiologic classification of hemophilic arthropathy. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  M. Hilgartner,et al.  Hemophilic arthropathy. Current concepts of pathogenesis and management. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  W. Kreuz,et al.  [Evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy--a comparison of MRI and Pettersson score]. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[17]  E. Walthers,et al.  Reproducibility of the Pettersson Scoring System: An interobserver study , 1989 .