The Lisbon Treaty: A Legal and Political Analysis

Introduction 1. Origins and birth of the Treaty of Lisbon 2. General provisions 3. Democracy 4. Fundamental rights 5. Freedom, security and justice 6. Institutions 7. External affairs 8. Financial, economic, social and other internal affairs 9. Conclusion: the Treaty of Lisbon and beyond 10. Annexes.

[1]  H. Labayle.  Architecte ou spectatrice?, La Cour de justice de l'Union dans l'Espace de liberte, securite et justice , 2006 .

[2]  Christoph Bertram,et al.  Europe's Military Revolution , 2001 .

[3]  Jean‐claude Piris.  The Constitution for Europe: A Legal Analysis , 2006 .

[4]  C. Zilioli,et al.  The External Relations of the Euro Area: Legal Aspects , 1999, Common Market Law Review.

[5]  Johannes Jarlebring.  Taking stock of the European Convention What added value does the Convention bring to the process of treaty revision? , 2003, German Law Journal.

[6]  Daniel Flore.  La perspective d'un procureur européen , 2008 .

[7]  S. Hix.  What's wrong with the European Union and how to fix it , 2008, Ethics & International Affairs.

[8]  G. Majone.  Europe’s ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards , 1998 .

[9]  S. Hix,et al.  Why is There a Democratic Deficit in the EU? A Response to Majone and Moravcsik , 2006 .

[10]  Dorota Leczykiewicz.  Constitutional Conflicts and the Third Pillar , 2008 .

[11]  A. Moravcsik.  Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union , 2002 .

[12]  Raymond J. Friel.  Secession From the European Union: Checking Out of the Proverbial "Cockroach Motel" , 2003 .

[13]  Locus standi of individuals under Article 230(4): The Return of Euridice? , 2008 .

[14]  J. Werts.  The European Council , 2008 .

[15]  G. Milton,et al.  The European Constitution : its origins, negotiation and meaning , 2005 .

[16]  G. Bermann.  The Lisbon Treaty: The Irish ‘No’.: National Parliaments and Subsidiarity , 2008, European Constitutional Law Review.

[17]  J. Weiler,et al.  European democracy and its critique , 1995 .

[18]  Julio Baquero Cruz.  The Legacy of the Maastricht-Urteil and the Pluralist Movement , 2008 .

[19]  Ramón Torrent.  Whom is the European Central Bank the Central Bank of?: Reaction to Zilioli and Selmayr , 1999, Common Market Law Review.

[20]  Christine Kaddous.  Role and position of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy under the Lisbon Treaty , 2008 .

[21]  J. Weiler.  Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision , 2010 .

[22]  J. Weiler.  The constitution of Europe , 1999 .

[23]  J. Louis.  Le droit de retrait de l'Union européenne , 2006 .

[24]  Paul Magnette,et al.  The European Convention: Bargaining in the Shadow of Rhetoric , 2004 .

[25]  A. Moravcsik.  The European Constitutional Settlement , 2008 .

[26]  Tapio Raunio,et al.  National parliaments within the enlarged European Union : from 'victims' of integration to competitive actors? , 2007 .

[27]  C. Zilioli,et al.  The European Central Bank: An Independent Specialized Organization of Community Law , 2000, Common Market Law Review.

[28]  V. Schmidt,et al.  Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities , 2008, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[29]  A. Moravcsik.  The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht , 1998 .

[30]  Clemens Ladenburger.  Police and Criminal Law in the Treaty of Lisbon , 2008, European Constitutional Law Review.

[31]  P. Norman.  The accidental constitution : the making of Europe's constitutional treaty , 2005 .

[32]  A. Moravcsik.  In Defence of the 'Democratic Deficit': Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union* , 2002 .

[33]  The European Judiciary after Lisbon , 2007 .

[34]  D. Grimm.  Does Europe Need a Constitution , 2010 .

[35]  J. Louis.  The Lisbon Treaty: The Irish ‘No’.: National Parliaments and the Principle of Subsidiarity – Legal Options and Practical Limits , 2008, European Constitutional Law Review.

[36]  Ernest Wistrich.  The United States of Europe , 1993 .

[37]  J. Raymond.  PROVIDING A CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EU: ARTICLE 59 OF THE DRAFT EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION , 2004, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[38]  M. Dean,et al.  Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society , 1999 .

[39]  J. Rifkin.  The European Dream , 2004 .

[40]  I. Bantekas.  The principle of mutual recognition in EU criminal law , 2007 .

[41]  M. Rutten.  From Saint-Malo to Nice. European Defence: Core Documents , 2001 .

[42]  A. Moravcsik,et al.  What can we learn from the collapse of the European constitutional project? , 2006 .

[43]  G. Braibant.  La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne , 2001 .

[44]  G. Majone.  Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth , 2009 .

[45]  Jean‐claude Piris.  Does the European Union have a constitution? Does it need one? , 2001 .

[46]  R. Wessel.  The State of Affairs in EU Security and Defence Policy: The Breakthrough in the Treaty of Nice , 2003 .

[47]  L. Rossi.  "Constitutionnalisation" de l'Union européenne et des droits fondamentaux , 2002 .