Predictive Validity of UAS/RPA Sensor Operator Training Qualification Measures

U.S. Air Force sensor operators (SOs) are enlisted aviators who work side-by-side with unmanned aerial systems/remotely piloted aircraft (UAS/RPA) pilots, providing assistance with all aspects of aircraft employment and sensor management. SO training qualification includes medical, citizenship, and security standards and aptitude requirements. The current study examined the validity of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) for predicting grades of students in three SO courses. The ASVAB composites used for SO training qualification (General and Electronics) demonstrated good predictive validity for all three courses (corrected for range restriction and criterion unreliability): Basic Sensor Operator Course, n = 461, r = .541 and .535; MQ-1 Initial Qualification/Requalification Training, n = 430, r = .583 and .553; MQ-9 Initial Qualification/Requalification Training, n = 249, r = .357 and .334). Although current selection methods are effective, based on results of UAS/RPA job/task analyses, the Air Force is examining the utility of other measures to supplement the ASVAB.

[1]  Raymond E King,et al.  Psychological Attributes Critical to the Performance of MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper U.S. Air Force Sensor Operators , 2010 .

[2]  R. Elwood.  MicroCog: Assessment of Cognitive Functioning , 2001, Neuropsychology Review.

[3]  Thomas R. Carretta,et al.  Pilot Candidate Selection Method , 2011 .

[4]  Sarah A. Hezlett,et al.  Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: can one construct predict them all? , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  D. Lawley.  IV.—A Note on Karl Pearson's Selection Formulæ , 1944, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Section A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  Thomas R. Carretta,et al.  Early Identification of Unmanned Aircraft Pilots Using Measures of Personality and Aptitude , 2014 .

[7]  William R Howse.  Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, and Other Characteristics for Remotely Piloted Aircraft Pilots and Operators , 2011 .

[8]  Thomas R. Carretta,et al.  Development and Validation of the Test of Basic Aviation Skills (TBAS) , 2005 .

[9]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[10]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis , 1989 .

[11]  Donna L. Mohr,et al.  Multiple Regression , 2002, Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders.

[12]  William R. Howse,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft Systems Selection Practices: Current Research and Future Directions , 2013 .

[13]  Malcolm James Ree,et al.  Predicting job performance: Not much more than g.. , 1994 .

[14]  Jacob Cohen.  The Cost of Dichotomization , 1983 .

[15]  M. Ree,et al.  PREDICTING TRAINING SUCCESS: NOT MUCH MORE THAN g , 2006 .

[16]  Christopher D. Nye,et al.  Factor Structure of the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test Form S: Analysis and Comparison with Previous Forms , 2010 .

[17]  Thomas R Carretta,et al.  Predictive validity of pilot selection instruments for remotely piloted aircraft training outcome. , 2013, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  Kent McDonald,et al.  Important and Critical Psychological Attributes of USAF MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper Pilots According to Subject Matter Experts , 2011 .