Information and Competition in U.S. Forest Service Timber Auctions

This paper studies the bidding behavior of firms in U.S. Forest Service timber auctions in 1976--1990. When conducting timber auctions, the Forest Service publicly announces its estimates of the tract characteristics before the auction, and each bidder additionally has an opportunity to inspect the tract and form its own private estimates. We build a model that incorporates both differential information and the fact that bids placed in timber auctions are multidimensional. The theory predicts that bidders will strategically distort their bids based on their private information, a practice known as 'skewed bidding.' Using a dataset that includes both the public ex ante Forest Service estimates and the ex post realizations of the tract characteristics, we test our model and provide evidence that bidders do possess private information. Our results suggest that private information affects Forest Service revenue and creates allocational inefficiency. Finally, we establish that risk aversion plays an important role in bidding behavior.

[1]  Yeon-Koo Che Design competition through multidimensional auctions , 1993 .

[2]  Susan Athey,et al.  Information and Competition in U.S. Forest Service Timber Auctions , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Monotone Comparative Statics , 1994 .

[4]  Thomas M. Stoker,et al.  Semiparametric Estimation of Index Coefficients , 1989 .

[5]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Information-eliciting compensation schemes , 1985 .

[6]  James E. Diekmann,et al.  Coping with Uncertainty in Unit Price Contracting , 1982 .

[7]  P. Robinson ROOT-N-CONSISTENT SEMIPARAMETRIC REGRESSION , 1988 .

[8]  Jean-Francois Richard,et al.  Bidder Collusion at Forest Service Timber Sales , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of auctions and competitive bidding , 1982 .

[10]  K. Leffler,et al.  To Harvest or Not to Harvest? An Analysis of Cutting Behavior on Federal Timber Sales Contracts , 1988 .

[11]  N. Persico Information acquisition in auctions , 2000 .

[12]  Jean-Jacques Laffont,et al.  Structural Analysis of Auction Data , 1996 .

[13]  U.S. FOREST SERVICE TIMBER AUCTIONS* , 1998 .

[14]  R. Hansen SEALED‐BID VERSUS OPEN AUCTIONS: THE EVIDENCE , 1986 .

[15]  Susan Athey,et al.  Comparative Statics Under Uncertainty: Single Crossing Properties and Log-Supermodularity , 1998 .

[16]  David Joseph Wood A study of multiplicative-strategy equilibria in second-price multicomponent auctions , 1989 .

[17]  J. Heckman The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models , 1976 .

[18]  Shmuel S. Oren,et al.  Bidder cost revelation in electric power auctions , 1994 .

[19]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  An Alternating Recognition Model of English Auctions , 2000 .

[20]  R. Porter,et al.  An Empirical Study of an Auction with Asymmetric Information , 1988 .

[21]  Susan Athey,et al.  Single Crossing Properties and the Existence of Pure Strategy Equilibria in Games of Incomplete Information , 1997 .