Optimization from design rules, source and mask, to full chip with a single computational lithography framework: level-set-methods-based inverse lithography technology (ILT)

For semiconductor manufacturers moving toward advanced technology nodes -32nm, 22nm and below - lithography presents a great challenge, because it is fundamentally constrained by basic principles of optical physics. Because no major lithography hardware improvements are expected over the next couple years, Computational Lithography has been recognized by the industry as the key technology needed to drive lithographic performance. This implies not only simultaneous co-optimization of all the lithographic enhancement tricks that have been learned over the years, but that they also be pushed to the limit by powerful computational techniques and systems. In this paper a single computational lithography framework for design, mask, and source co-optimization will be explained in non-mathematical language. A number of memory and logic device results at the 32nm node and below are presented to demonstrate the benefits of Level-Set-Method-based ILT in applications covering design rule optimization, SMO, and full-chip correction.

[1]  Chi-Yuan Hung,et al.  Pushing the lithography limit: applying inverse lithography technology (ILT) at the 65nm generation , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Sang-Gyun Woo,et al.  Trade-off between inverse lithography mask complexity and lithographic performance , 2009, Photomask Japan.

[3]  Vikram Tolani,et al.  Source-mask co-optimization (SMO) using level set methods , 2009, Photomask Technology.

[4]  Guangming Xiao,et al.  Source optimization and mask design to minimize MEEF in low k1 lithography , 2008, Photomask Japan.

[5]  Ki-Ho Baik,et al.  Evaluation of lithographic benefits of using ILT techniques for 22nm-node , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Kresimir Mihic,et al.  Inverse lithography technology (ILT): keep the balance between SRAF and MRC at 45 and 32 nm , 2007 .

[7]  Ki-Ho Baik,et al.  Evaluation of inverse lithography technology for 55nm-node memory device , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Vikram Tolani,et al.  Considering MEEF in inverse lithography technology (ILT) and source mask optimization (SMO) , 2008, Photomask Technology.

[9]  Steve Prins,et al.  Exploration of complex metal 2D design rules using inverse lithography , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Linyong Pang,et al.  Inverse lithography technology (ILT): What is the impact to the photomask industry? , 2006, Photomask Japan.

[11]  Daniel S. Abrams,et al.  Fast inverse lithography technology , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Ki-Ho Baik,et al.  Validation of inverse lithography technology (ILT) and its adaptive SRAF at advanced technology nodes , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Ki-Ho Baik,et al.  Source-mask optimization (SMO): from theory to practice , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Steve Prins,et al.  Inverse lithography as a DFM tool: accelerating design rule development with model-based assist feature placement, fast optical proximity correction and lithographic hotspot detection , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Linyong Pang,et al.  Inverse lithography technology principles in practice: unintuitive patterns , 2005, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[16]  Ki-Ho Baik,et al.  Litho/Design Co-Optimization and Area Scaling for the 22-nm Logic Node , 2010 .

[17]  Yan Wang,et al.  Inverse lithography technology at chip scale , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.