Can the impact of scholarly images be assessed online? An exploratory study using image identification technology

The web contains a huge number of digital pictures. For scholars publishing such images it is important to know how well used their images are, but no method seems to have been developed for monitoring the value of academic images. In particular, can the impact of scientific or artistic images be assessed through identifying images copied or reused on the Internet? This article explores a case study of 260 NASA images to investigate whether the TinEye search engine could theoretically help to provide this information. The results show that the selected pictures had a median of 11 online copies each. However, a classification of 210 of these copies reveals that only 1.4p were explicitly used in academic publications, reflecting research impact, and the majority of the NASA pictures were used for informal scholarly (or educational) communication (37p). Additional analyses of world famous paintings and scientific images about pathology and molecular structures suggest that image contents are important for the type and extent of image use. Although it is reasonable to use statistics derived from TinEye for assessing image reuse value, the extent of its image indexing is not known. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Motivations for URL citations to open access library and information science articles , 2006, Scientometrics.

[2]  Abby Goodrum,et al.  Image Information Retrieval: An Overview of Current Research , 2000, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[3]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  What is this link doing here? Beginning a fine-grained process of identifying reasons for academic hyperlink creation , 2003, Inf. Res..

[4]  Helene E. Roberts A picture is worth a thousand words: art indexing in electronic databases , 2001 .

[5]  Kayvan Kousha Characteristics of open access scholarly publishing: A multidisciplinary study , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[6]  Tsai-Youn Hung,et al.  Search Moves and Tactics for Image Retrieval in the Field of Journalism: A Pilot Study , 2005 .

[7]  Hsiao-Tieh Pu,et al.  An analysis of failed queries for web image retrieval , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[9]  Joan E. Beaudoin,et al.  An investigation of image users across disciplines: A model of image needs, retrieval and use , 2008, ASIST.

[10]  Marcel Worring,et al.  Content-Based Image Retrieval at the End of the Early Years , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Krystyna K. Matusiak Information Seeking Behavior in Digital Image Collections: A Cognitive Approach , 2006 .

[12]  Jeff Brunskill,et al.  Image attributes: A study of scientific diagrams , 2002, ASIST.

[13]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching: An automatic analysis of online syllabuses , 2008 .

[14]  Hsin-Liang Chen An analysis of image queries in the field of art history , 2001 .

[15]  Edie M. Rasmussen,et al.  Searching for images: The analysis of users' queries for image retrieval in American history , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Hsiao-Tieh Pu,et al.  A comparative analysis of web image and textual queries , 2005, Online Inf. Rev..

[17]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  What do we know about links and linking? A framework for studying links in academic environments , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[18]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Image searching on the Excite Web search engine , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[19]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The Web impact of open access social science research , 2007 .

[20]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Motivations for academic web site interlinking: evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Yu-Wei Chang,et al.  Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective , 2008 .

[23]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  A microscopic link analysis of academic institutions within a country — the case of Israel , 2004, Scientometrics.

[24]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Google Scholar citations and Google Web-URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis , 2007 .

[25]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  How is science cited on the Web? A classification of google unique Web citations , 2007 .

[26]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  User-generated collection-level metadata in an online photo-sharing system , 2009 .

[27]  Susanne Ornager Image Retrieval: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical User Studies on Accessing Information in Images. , 1997 .

[28]  Anton J. Nederhof,et al.  Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review , 2006, Scientometrics.

[29]  John P. Eakins,et al.  Towards intelligent image retrieval , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[30]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Invoked on the Web , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Bernard J. Jansen Searching for digital images on the web , 2008, J. Documentation.

[32]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  H J Buncke,et al.  Using the Internet for rapid exchange of photographs and X-ray images to evaluate potential extremity replantation candidates. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.