Post-translational modifications and chromatin dynamics.

The dynamic structure of chromatin is linked to gene regulation and many other biological functions. Consequently, it is of importance to understand the factors that regulate chromatin dynamics. While the in vivo analysis of chromatin has verified that histone post-translational modifications play a role in modulating DNA accessibility, the complex nuclear environment and multiplicity of modifications prevents clear conclusions as to how individual modifications influence chromatin dynamics in the cell. For this reason, in vitro analyses of model reconstituted nucleosomal arrays has been pivotal in understanding the dynamic nature of chromatin compaction and the affects that specific post-translational modifications can have on the higher order chromatin structure. In this mini-review, we briefly describe the dynamic chromatin structures that have been observed in vitro and the environmental conditions that give rise to these various conformational states. Our focus then turns to a discussion of the specific histone post-translational modifications that have been shown to alter formation of these higher order chromatin structures in vitro and how this may relate to the biological state and accessibility of chromatin in vivo.

[1]  Dinshaw J. Patel,et al.  Multivalent engagement of chromatin modifications by linked binding modules , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[2]  Zu-Wen Sun,et al.  Ubiquitination of histone H2B regulates H3 methylation and gene silencing in yeast , 2002, Nature.

[3]  M. Pazin,et al.  Histone H4-K16 Acetylation Controls Chromatin Structure and Protein Interactions , 2006, Science.

[4]  Mustafa Mir,et al.  Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation , 2017, Nature.

[5]  Jian Cao,et al.  Epigenetic Regulation by Lysine Demethylase 5 (KDM5) Enzymes in Cancer , 2011, Cancers.

[6]  B. Fierz,et al.  Sumoylated Human Histone H4 Prevents Chromatin Compaction by Inhibiting Long-range Internucleosomal Interactions* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  T. Richmond,et al.  Chromatin fiber folding: requirement for the histone H4 N-terminal tail. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J. Ausió,et al.  Magnesium-dependent Association and Folding of Oligonucleosomes Reconstituted with Ubiquitinated H2A* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  Mark Johnston,et al.  Methylation of Histone H3 by COMPASS Requires Ubiquitination of Histone H2B by Rad6* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  N. Korolev,et al.  The effects of histone H4 tail acetylations on cation-induced chromatin folding and self-association , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  J. Workman,et al.  Histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation breaks the genome's silence , 2006, Genome Biology.

[12]  K. Luger,et al.  The Core Histone N-terminal Tail Domains Function Independently and Additively during Salt-dependent Oligomerization of Nucleosomal Arrays* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  R. Ghosh,et al.  Chromatin higher-order structure and dynamics. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[14]  Andrew J. Bannister,et al.  Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain , 2001, Nature.

[15]  S. Sekine,et al.  Structural and biochemical analyses of monoubiquitinated human histones H2B and H4 , 2016, Open Biology.

[16]  N. Korolev,et al.  Regulation of Nucleosome Stacking and Chromatin Compaction by the Histone H4 N-Terminal Tail-H2A Acidic Patch Interaction. , 2017, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[18]  K. Shokat,et al.  The effect of H3K79 dimethylation and H4K20 trimethylation on nucleosome and chromatin structure , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[19]  D. Tremethick,et al.  The nucleosome surface regulates chromatin compaction and couples it with transcriptional repression , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[20]  J. van Noort,et al.  Quantitative analysis of single-molecule force spectroscopy on folded chromatin fibers , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  Takaaki Hikima,et al.  Nucleosomal arrays self‐assemble into supramolecular globular structures lacking 30‐nm fibers , 2016, The EMBO journal.

[22]  J. Hayes,et al.  Acetylation Mimics Within a Single Nucleosome Alter Local DNA Accessibility In Compacted Nucleosome Arrays , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Keji Zhao,et al.  Genome-wide prediction of conserved and nonconserved enhancers by histone acetylation patterns. , 2006, Genome research.

[24]  A Klug,et al.  Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin , 1979, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  K. Luger,et al.  A charged and contoured surface on the nucleosome regulates chromatin compaction , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[26]  S. Sekine,et al.  Structural Basis of Heterochromatin Formation by Human HP1. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[27]  D. Rhodes,et al.  Nucleosome repeat length and linker histone stoichiometry determine chromatin fiber structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Thomas B. Brouwer,et al.  Single-molecule force spectroscopy on histone H4 tail-cross-linked chromatin reveals fiber folding , 2017, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  C. Allis,et al.  Ubiquitinated histone H2B is preferentially located in transcriptionally active chromatin. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[30]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Histone H2B Monoubiquitination Functions Cooperatively with FACT to Regulate Elongation by RNA Polymerase II , 2006, Cell.

[31]  Alan P. Wolffe,et al.  Disruption of Higher-Order Folding by Core Histone Acetylation Dramatically Enhances Transcription of Nucleosomal Arrays by RNA Polymerase III , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[32]  Ann Dean,et al.  Epigenetics of beta-globin gene regulation. , 2008, Mutation research.

[33]  J. B. Rattner,et al.  The higher-order structure of chromatin: evidence for a helical ribbon arrangement , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  P. Lichter,et al.  Histone acetylation increases chromatin accessibility , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[35]  T. R. Hebbes,et al.  Core histone hyperacetylation co‐maps with generalized DNase I sensitivity in the chicken beta‐globin chromosomal domain. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[36]  N. Krogan,et al.  Histone H2B Ubiquitylation Is Associated with Elongating RNA Polymerase II , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[37]  D. Gary Gilliland,et al.  The Retinoblastoma Binding Protein RBP2 Is an H3K4 Demethylase , 2007, Cell.

[38]  C. Woodcock Chromatin fibers observed in situ in frozen hydrated sections. Native fiber diameter is not correlated with nucleosome repeat length , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  M. Shogren-Knaak,et al.  Role of Direct Interactions between the Histone H4 Tail and the H2A Core in Long Range Nucleosome Contacts* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  J. Ausió,et al.  Modulation of Chromatin Folding by Histone Acetylation (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  K. Maeshima,et al.  The 10-nm chromatin fiber and its relationship to interphase chromosome organization , 2017, Biochemical Society transactions.

[42]  Eran Segal,et al.  Monoubiquitinated H2B is associated with the transcribed region of highly expressed genes in human cells , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[43]  Laurence Florens,et al.  Histone Crosstalk between H2B Monoubiquitination and H3 Methylation Mediated by COMPASS , 2007, Cell.

[44]  J. Hansen,et al.  Conformational dynamics of the chromatin fiber in solution: determinants, mechanisms, and functions. , 2002, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[45]  K. V. van Holde,et al.  Homogeneous reconstituted oligonucleosomes, evidence for salt-dependent folding in the absence of histone H1. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[46]  L. Murphy,et al.  Level of ubiquitinated histone H2B in chromatin is coupled to ongoing transcription. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[47]  Jörg Langowski,et al.  Histone Acetylation Regulates Chromatin Accessibility: Role of H4K16 in Inter-nucleosome Interaction. , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[48]  J. Hansen,et al.  Reversible oligonucleosome self-association: dependence on divalent cations and core histone tail domains. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[49]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[50]  Jacques Côté,et al.  Perceiving the epigenetic landscape through histone readers , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[51]  R. Ghirlando,et al.  Histone H4 K16Q mutation, an acetylation mimic, causes structural disorder of its N-terminal basic patch in the nucleosome. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  Uma M. Muthurajan,et al.  The role of the nucleosome acidic patch in modulating higher order chromatin structure , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[53]  Song Tan,et al.  Nucleosome Structure and Function , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[54]  D. Raleigh,et al.  Histone H2B ubiquitylation disrupts local and higher order chromatin compaction , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[55]  J. Hansen,et al.  Hybrid trypsinized nucleosomal arrays: identification of multiple functional roles of the H2A/H2B and H3/H4 N-termini in chromatin fiber compaction. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[56]  Bernhard Kuster,et al.  Requirement of ATM-dependent monoubiquitylation of histone H2B for timely repair of DNA double-strand breaks. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[57]  J. Hansen,et al.  Formation and stability of higher order chromatin structures. Contributions of the histone octamer. , 1994, Journal of Biological Chemistry.