Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing

Abstract The assumption underlying research on feedback is that, in writing, feedback is something provided for what actually shows up in the learner's text. However, a new dimension may need to be added to the debate in light of the Noticing Hypothesis, the Output Hypothesis, and the emerging evidence on what L2 learners actually notice as they produce output and receive input. Noticing may occur not just when learners produce output in an observable form, but also when they stop short of articulating their meaning or form, which results in “covert problems.” Delving into issues discussed in the rest of the contributions to the special issue, and using a multistage writing task, the current study investigated (1) overt and covert problems that Japanese university EFL learners experience as they produce written output, (2) the extent to which they notice their solutions and incorporate them in their subsequent revisions, and (3) the differential roles that a model text and reformulations may play in these processes. The results revealed that the participants spontaneously noticed solutions to both overt and covert problems and incorporated them in their revisions. The two types of feedback texts were found to play somewhat different roles, as the model text included solutions to overt and covert problems roughly equally, while reformulations offered solutions overwhelmingly to overt problems. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed based on these findings.

[1]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION , 2001 .

[2]  Andrew D. Cohen Reformulating Second-Language Compositions: A Potential Source of Input for the Learner. , 1983 .

[3]  Zoltán Dörnyei,et al.  The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition , 2008 .

[4]  Shinichi Izumi Comprehension and Production Processes in Second Language Learning: In Search of the Psycholinguistic Rationale of the Output Hypothesis , 2003 .

[5]  R. Ellis,et al.  Preemptive Focus on Form in the ESL Classroom , 2001 .

[6]  Alison Mackey,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between Modified Output and Working Memory Capacity. , 2010 .

[7]  Catherine Doughty,et al.  Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series. , 1998 .

[8]  Neomy Storch,et al.  LEARNERS’ PROCESSING, UPTAKE, AND RETENTION OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON WRITING , 2010, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[9]  M. Swain Communicative competence : Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development , 1985 .

[10]  Rosa M. Manchón,et al.  The Differential Effect of Two Types of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Noticing and Uptake: Reformulation vs. Error Correction , 2010 .

[11]  Maren S. Uggen Reinvestigating the Noticing Function of Output , 2012 .

[12]  M. Swain Three functions of output in second language learning , 1995 .

[13]  Osamu Hanaoka Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task , 2007 .

[14]  Cynthia B. Watson The Use and Abuse of Models in the ESL Writing Class , 1982 .

[15]  R. Adams,et al.  L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development , 2003 .

[16]  Julio Roca de Larios,et al.  The Use of Models as a Form of Written Feedback to Secondary School Pupils of English. , 2010 .

[17]  Ali Shehadeh Comprehensible Output, From Occurrence to Acquisition:An Agenda for Acquisitional Research , 2002 .

[18]  K. Bot The Psycholinguistics of the Output Hypothesis , 1996 .

[19]  Shinichi Izumi,et al.  DOES OUTPUT PROMOTE NOTICING AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2000 .

[20]  R. L. Allwright,et al.  Investigating Reformulation as a Practical Strategy for the Teaching of Academic Writing , 1988 .

[21]  R. Schmidt The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[22]  C. Doughty Cognitive Underpinnings of Focus on Form , 1999 .

[23]  Merrill Swain,et al.  What underlies immersion students' production: The case of avoir besoin de , 2004 .

[24]  Charlene Polio,et al.  LEARNERS' USES OF TWO TYPES OF WRITTEN FEEDBACK ON A L2 WRITING REVISION TASK , 2007, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[25]  Andrew D. Cohen Writing Like a Native: The Process of Reformulation. , 1982 .

[26]  Jessica Williams Learner-Generated Attention to Form. , 1999 .

[27]  Leslie Dickinson,et al.  AUTONOMY AND MOTIVATION A LITERATURE REVIEW , 1995 .

[28]  Donald S. Qi,et al.  Exploring the Role of Noticing in a Three-Stage Second Language Writing Task. , 2001 .

[29]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[30]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Talking It through: Two French Immersion Learners' Response to Reformulation. , 2002 .

[31]  Guy Cook,et al.  Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson , 1995 .

[32]  Shinichi Izumi OUTPUT, INPUT ENHANCEMENT, AND THE NOTICING HYPOTHESIS , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[33]  Luxin Yang,et al.  Exploring the role of reformulations and a model text in EFL students’ writing performance , 2010 .

[34]  M. Swain The output hypothesis : Just speaking and writing aren't enough , 1993 .

[35]  Jessica Williams,et al.  The Potential Role(s) of Writing in Second Language Development. , 2012 .

[36]  Osamu Hanaoka Noticing from models and reformulations : A case study of two Japanese EFL learners , 2006 .

[37]  Shinichi Izumi,et al.  TESTING THE OUTPUT HYPOTHESIS , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  Rosa M. Manchón Chapter 4. Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research , 2011 .

[39]  Bill VanPatten,et al.  Input processing in second language acquisition , 2003 .

[40]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Reformulation and the Learning of French Pronominal Verbs in a Canadian French Immersion Context. , 2002 .

[41]  H. Holec Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning , 1981 .

[42]  Neomy Storch,et al.  What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback , 2012 .

[43]  M. Swain,et al.  Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning , 1995, Applied Linguistics.

[44]  P. Robinson Attention, Memory, and the “Noticing” Hypothesis , 1995 .

[45]  M. Swain,et al.  Reformulation: the cognitive conflict and L2 learning it generates , 2005 .