A blue/green water‐based accounting framework for assessment of water security
暂无分享,去创建一个
Hoshin Vijai Gupta | Dulce Buchala Bicca Rodrigues | Eduardo Mario Mendiondo | H. Gupta | E. Mendiondo | D. B. Rodrigues
[1] Martin Volk,et al. Land use change in a 200‐year period and its effect on blue and green water flow in two Slovenian Mediterranean catchments—lessons for the future , 2013 .
[2] M. Hipsey,et al. “Panta Rhei—Everything Flows”: Change in hydrology and society—The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022 , 2013 .
[3] I. Chaubey,et al. A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services , 2013 .
[4] Bruno Marcos,et al. Can we infer about ecosystem services from EIA and SEA practice? A framework for analysis and examples from Portugal , 2013 .
[5] H.A.J. van Lanen,et al. Making the distinction between water scarcity and drought using an observation‐modeling framework , 2013 .
[6] Gregg M. Garfin,et al. Water Security and Adaptive Management in the Arid Americas , 2013 .
[7] J. Padowski,et al. Water availability and vulnerability of 225 large cities in the United States , 2012 .
[8] Yi-Wen Chiu,et al. Quantifying the regional water footprint of biofuel production by incorporating hydrologic modeling , 2012 .
[9] Brian Richter,et al. A PRESUMPTIVE STANDARD FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW PROTECTION , 2012 .
[10] A. Griensven,et al. Critical review of SWAT applications in the upper Nile basin countries , 2012 .
[11] Karen Bakker,et al. Water Security: Research Challenges and Opportunities , 2012, Science.
[12] Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al. Assessing water footprint at river basin level: a case study for the Heihe River Basin in northwest China , 2012 .
[13] A. Hoekstra,et al. Global Monthly Water Scarcity: Blue Water Footprints versus Blue Water Availability , 2012, PloS one.
[14] R. Wilby,et al. Smart licensing and environmental flows: Modeling framework and sensitivity testing , 2011 .
[15] C. Schaefer,et al. ATRIBUTOS FÍSICO-HIDRICOS E CARBONO ORGÂNICO DE UM ARGISSOLO APÓS 23 ANOS DE DIFERENTES MANEJOS , 2011 .
[16] Mark Zeitoun,et al. The Global Web of National Water Security , 2011 .
[17] Matthew Egan,et al. The Water Footprint Assessment Manual. Setting the Global Standard , 2011 .
[18] Rolf Weingartner,et al. Global monthly water stress: 2. Water demand and severity of water stress , 2011 .
[19] M. Jha. Evaluating Hydrologic Response of an Agricultural Watershed for Watershed Analysis , 2011 .
[20] P. Polglase,et al. Modeling changes in organic carbon stocks for distinct soils in southeastern brazil after four eucalyptus rotations using the century model , 2011 .
[21] Caroline A Sullivan,et al. Quantifying water vulnerability: a multi-dimensional approach , 2011 .
[22] M. Aldaya,et al. The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard , 2011 .
[23] Cristina Madrid,et al. Rethinking the Concepts of Virtual Water and Water Footprint in Relation to the Production–Consumption Binomial and the Water–Energy Nexus , 2011 .
[24] J. Rockström,et al. Building Water Resilience in the Face of Global Change: From a Blue-Only to a Green-Blue Water Approach to Land-Water Management , 2010 .
[25] P. McIntyre,et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity , 2010, Nature.
[26] Yi Zhang,et al. Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, Part I: a critical review. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.
[27] Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model: Current Developments and Applications , 2010 .
[28] .. Brasil.AgênciaNacionaldeÁguas. Atlas Brasil : abastecimento urbano de água , 2009 .
[29] Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling , 2009 .
[30] J. Rockström,et al. Future water availability for global food production: The potential of green water for increasing resilience to global change , 2009 .
[31] Jay O'Keeffe. Sustaining river ecosystems: balancing use and protection , 2009 .
[32] Raghavan Srinivasan,et al. Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intensive hydrologic model , 2009 .
[33] N. Eriyagama,et al. Developing a software package for global desktop assessment of environmental flows , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..
[34] F. Freire,et al. Fracionamento químico e físico do carbono orgânico total em um solo de mata submetido a diferentes usos , 2008 .
[35] Therese M Mulvey,et al. Sink or Swim. , 2008, Journal of oncology practice.
[36] K. Abbaspour,et al. Estimation of freshwater availability in the West African sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model , 2008 .
[37] David Grey,et al. Sink or Swim? Water security for growth and development , 2007 .
[38] I. Calder. Forests and water—Ensuring forest benefits outweigh water costs , 2007 .
[39] T. McMahon,et al. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification , 2007 .
[40] Jenq-Tzong Shiau,et al. Pareto‐optimal solutions for environmental flow schemes incorporating the intra‐annual and interannual variability of the natural flow regime , 2007 .
[41] Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .
[42] M. Whately,et al. Cantareira 2006: um olhar sobre o maior manancial de água da Região Metropolitana de São Paulo; resultados do diagnóstico socioambiental participativo do Sistema Cantareira , 2007 .
[43] Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al. Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .
[44] W. Rawls,et al. Soil Water Characteristic Estimates by Texture and Organic Matter for Hydrologic Solutions , 2006 .
[45] S. Kanae,et al. Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources , 2006, Science.
[46] J. Rockström,et al. The New Blue and Green Water Paradigm: Breaking New Ground for Water Resources Planning and Management , 2006 .
[47] Assefa M. Melesse,et al. Influences of Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation Methods on SWAT's Hydrologic Simulation in a Northwestern Minnesota Watershed , 2006 .
[48] K. Saxton,et al. The SPAW Model for Agricultural Field and Pond Hydrologic Simulation , 2006 .
[49] P. Krause,et al. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EFFICIENCY CRITERIA FOR HYDROLOGICAL MODEL ASSESSMENT , 2005 .
[50] T. D. Mitchell,et al. Ecosystem Service Supply and Vulnerability to Global Change in Europe , 2005, Science.
[51] Indrajeet Chaubey,et al. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS, CALIBRATION, AND VALIDATIONS FOR A MULTISITE AND MULTIVARIABLE SWAT MODEL 1 , 2005 .
[52] A. M. Genovez,et al. Classificação Hidrológica de Solos Brasileiros para a Estimativa da Chuva Excedente com o Método do Serviço de Conservação do Solo dos Estados Unidos Parte 2: Aplicação , 2005 .
[53] K. Abbaspour,et al. Estimating Uncertain Flow and Transport Parameters Using a Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Procedure , 2004 .
[54] Petra Döll,et al. A Pilot Global Assessment of Environmental Water Requirements and Scarcity , 2004 .
[55] A. D. Benetti,et al. Current practices for establishing environmental flows in Brazil , 2004 .
[56] R. Tharme. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers , 2003 .
[57] Christine F. Reilly,et al. Estimation of 7‐day, 10‐year low‐streamflow statistics using baseflow correlation , 2003 .
[58] D. Legates,et al. Interannual and seasonal variability of modelled soil moisture in Oklahoma , 2003 .
[59] Denis A. Hughes,et al. A desktop model used to provide an initial estimate of the ecological instream flow requirements of rivers in South Africa , 2003 .
[60] A. Hoekstra. Virtual water trade : A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade , 2003 .
[61] H. G. Santos,et al. The Brazilian Soil Classification System , 2002 .
[62] R. L. Porto,et al. Planning as a Tool to Deal with Extreme Events , 2002 .
[63] F. Nachtergaele. Soil taxonomy—a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys: Second edition, by Soil Survey Staff, 1999, USDA–NRCS, Agriculture Handbook number 436, Hardbound , 2001 .
[64] Jan Seibert,et al. Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfall-runoff model , 1999 .
[65] J. Arnold,et al. AUTOMATED METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BASEFLOW AND GROUND WATER RECHARGE FROM STREAMFLOW RECORDS 1 , 1999 .
[66] Soroosh Sorooshian,et al. Status of Automatic Calibration for Hydrologic Models: Comparison with Multilevel Expert Calibration , 1999 .
[67] D. Legates,et al. Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .
[68] Monica Ferreira do Amaral Porto,et al. The Brazilian Water Law: A New Level of Participation and Decision Making , 1998 .
[69] John R. Williams,et al. LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .
[70] Ronald A. Sloto,et al. HYSEP: A Computer Program for Streamflow Hydrograph Separation and Analysis , 1996 .
[71] Peter M. Allen,et al. Automated Base Flow Separation and Recession Analysis Techniques , 1995 .
[72] V. Singh,et al. The EPIC model. , 1995 .
[73] John R. Williams,et al. EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation. , 1990 .
[74] Andrew N. Sharpley,et al. EPIC, Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator , 1990 .
[75] W. Rawls,et al. Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture , 1986 .
[76] F. Beinroth. Relationships between U.S. soil taxonomy, the Brazilian soil classification system, and FAO/UNESCO [Food and Agriculture Organization/United Nations, Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization] soil units , 1975 .
[77] J. Nash,et al. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .
[78] Joint Fao,et al. Training manual on food irradiation technology and techniques : a joint undertaking by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency , 1970 .
[79] J. Monteith. Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.