THE EVOLUTION OF TERMINOLOGY WITHIN A LARGE DISTRIBUTED ENGINEERING PROJECT

Communication features in many engineering activities within an engineering project. It is the main form by which information & knowledge is shared, and facilitates the generation of a shared understanding between engineers. While there exists a significant body of literature relating to communication, much of the research has been through qualitative studies using techniques such as surveys, interviews and observation. Given the prevalence of computer-mediated communication and the development of techniques to analyse such datasets, there is now the opportunity to provide quantitative metrics that can characterise communication. Therefore, this paper examines this opportunity through the co-word analysis of the subject line terms of an engineering project e-mail corpus comprising of 10,628 e-mails, featuring 1,045 individuals and spanning over a 4 year period. More specifically, the analysis has focused on the evolution, use/re-use and centrality of terms across the various project stages. The results provide interesting insights in the evolution of engineering terminology, which leads onto a discussion on how these metrics may provide indicators of project 'normality'.

[1]  Terrill L. Frantz,et al.  Communication Networks from the Enron Email Corpus “It's Always About the People. Enron is no Different” , 2005, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[2]  James Oliver Wasiak,et al.  A content based approach for investigating the role and use of email in engineering design projects , 2010 .

[3]  Suzie Allard,et al.  Design engineers and technical professionals at work: Observing information usage in the workplace , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Scott A. DeLoach,et al.  An Overview of the Multiagent Systems Engineering Methodology , 2000, AOSE.

[5]  Seungyeop Han,et al.  Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services , 2007, WWW '07.

[6]  Dan Braha,et al.  Information flow structure in large-scale product development organizational networks , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process , 1996 .

[8]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  CHI 1994-2013: mapping two decades of intellectual progress through co-word analysis , 2014, CHI.

[9]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Topic and Role Discovery in Social Networks with Experiments on Enron and Academic Email , 2007, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[10]  Jean Pierre Courtial,et al.  Historical scientometrics? Mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with coword analysis , 1993, Scientometrics.

[11]  S. Borgatti,et al.  On Social Network Analysis in a Supply Chain Context , 2009 .

[12]  Shlomo Hershkop,et al.  Automated social hierarchy detection through email network analysis , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[13]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Fernando Pereira,et al.  Generating summary keywords for emails using topics , 2008, IUI '08.

[15]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Using Latent Semantic Analysis of Email to Detect Change in Social Groups , 2008, DMIN.

[16]  Ben J Hicks,et al.  The communication patterns of engineers within an SME in 2012 , 2013 .

[17]  C. Brammer,et al.  Communication Patterns of Engineers , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[18]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in Large Scale Software Development , 1990 .

[19]  Duncan Sanderson,et al.  Coordinating joint design work: the role of communication and artefacts , 1998 .

[20]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities , 2003 .

[21]  Neal S. Coulter,et al.  Software Engineering as Seen through Its Research Literature: A Study in Co-Word Analysis , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Yiming Yang,et al.  Introducing the Enron Corpus , 2004, CEAS.

[23]  Andrew J. Scholand,et al.  Social language network analysis , 2010, CSCW '10.

[24]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Design process improvement : a review of current practice , 2005 .

[25]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  The information-seeking practices of engineers: searching for documents as well as for people , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..