Determinants of farm diversification in the Netherlands

Farm diversification has been prominently supported by agricultural policy makers aiming to support rural development. To increase the understanding of determinants influencing diversification and hence to increase the efficiency of policies aiming to support farm diversification this paper presents the results of an analysis of diversification determinants. The research investigates Dutch farms diversification strategies using Farm Structural Survey (FSS) data of 2011 including 70,392 farms. The study uses a binary logit model to determine the characteristics influencing the diversification decision in general. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis for six diversification strategies was conducted. Additionally the study categorised the specific diversification activities in order to estimate a multinomial probit model, analysing three choice categories simultaneously. This enables us to compare determinants of farm diversification in general with determinants of specific activities. The analysis includes socio- demographic, economic and geophysical farm characteristics assumed to influence the diversification decision. Even though diversification is largely influenced by similar determinants, we find differences that are most pronounced for the adoption of nature conservation strategies. Consequently, it is important for policy makers to target policies at specific diversification activities in order to increase efficiency.

[1]  Marno Verbeek,et al.  A Guide to Modern Econometrics , 2000 .

[2]  Karlheinz Knickel,et al.  Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theory , 2000 .

[3]  Ayal Kimhi,et al.  Farm Work, Off-Farm Work, And Hired Farm Labor: Estimating A Discrete-Choice Model Of French Farm Couples' Labor Decisions , 2006 .

[4]  P. Nilsson,et al.  Staying on farms: An Ideological Background , 2002 .

[5]  W. M. D. Vries.  Farming with other gainful activities in The Netherlands. , 1993 .

[6]  Dirk Roep,et al.  Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe , 2003 .

[7]  A. Bryman,et al.  Handbook of data analysis , 2004 .

[8]  A. Hallam.  The competitive firm's response to risk , 1987 .

[9]  Jonathan Kropko,et al.  Choosing between multinomial logit and multinomial probit models for analysis of unordered choice data , 2007 .

[10]  David Kleijn,et al.  Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes , 2001, Nature.

[11]  J. Stoorvogel,et al.  Landscape properties as drivers for farm diversification: A Dutch case study , 2009 .

[12]  Anne-Mette Hjalager.  Agricultural diversification into tourism: Evidence of a European Community development programme , 1996 .

[13]  Carla Barbieri,et al.  Why is diversification an attractive farm adjustment strategy? Insights from Texas farmers and ranchers , 2009 .

[14]  Deborah J. Pain,et al.  Farming and birds in Europe: the common agricultural policy and its implications for bird conservation , 1997 .

[15]  R. Pope,et al.  Diversification in relation to farm size and other socioeconomic characteristics. , 1980 .

[16]  A. Mishra,et al.  Factors affecting farm enterprise diversification , 2004 .

[17]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[18]  W. Heijman,et al.  The economic impact of multifunctional agriculture in Dutch regions: An input-output model , 2013 .

[19]  C. Gardebroek,et al.  Diversification in Italian farm systems: Are farmers using interlinked strategies? , 2012 .

[20]  D. O’Connor,et al.  Supporting policies for social farming in Europe: progressing multifunctionality in respojnsaive rural areas , 2009 .

[21]  Gerard McElwee,et al.  Diversification and the Entrepreneurial Motivations of Farmers in Norway , 2011 .

[22]  C. Salvioni,et al.  Diversification and multifunctionality in Italy and the Netherlands: a comparative analysis , 2009 .

[23]  B. Ilbery.  Farm diversification as an adjustment strategy on the urban fringe of the West Midlands , 1991 .

[24]  J. Hassink,et al.  Current status and potential of care farms in the Netherlands , 2007 .

[25]  E. Weiss.  United Nations Conference on Environment and Development , 1992, International Legal Materials.

[26]  H. Renting,et al.  Methodological and Conceptual Issues in the Study of Multifunctionality and Rural Development , 2000 .

[27]  A. Piorr,et al.  Spatial differentiation of farm diversification: How rural attractiveness and vicinity to cities determine farm households´ response to the CAP , 2013 .

[28]  Geoff A. Wilson,et al.  Multifunctional Agriculture: A Transition Theory Perspective , 2007 .

[29]  P. Berkhout,et al.  AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REPORT 2003 OF THE NETHERLANDS: SUMMARY , 2008 .

[30]  Roel Jongeneel,et al.  Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional , 2008 .

[31]  P. Gatto,et al.  Factors Affecting Farmers’ Participation in Agri‐environmental Measures: A Northern Italian Perspective , 2007 .

[32]  Guido Van Huylenbroeck,et al.  Multifunctionality of Agriculture:A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments , 2007 .

[33]  L. A. Dernoi.  Farm tourism in Europe , 1983 .

[34]  S. Mcnally.  Farm diversification in England and Wales — what can we learn from the farm business survey? , 2001 .

[35]  J. Lingard,et al.  Risk management: a general framework for rural development. , 2003 .

[36]  R. Esposti,et al.  Determinants of farm diversification and interaction with the CAP. An application to FADN of Marche region (Italy) , 2008 .

[37]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis : a global perspective , 2010 .