Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples

Requiring only minimal assumptions for validity, nonparametric permutation testing provides a flexible and intuitive methodology for the statistical analysis of data from functional neuroimaging experiments, at some computational expense. Introduced into the functional neuroimaging literature by Holmes et al. ([ 1996 ]: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 16:7–22), the permutation approach readily accounts for the multiple comparisons problem implicit in the standard voxel‐by‐voxel hypothesis testing framework. When the appropriate assumptions hold, the nonparametric permutation approach gives results similar to those obtained from a comparable Statistical Parametric Mapping approach using a general linear model with multiple comparisons corrections derived from random field theory. For analyses with low degrees of freedom, such as single subject PET/SPECT experiments or multi‐subject PET/SPECT or fMRI designs assessed for population effects, the nonparametric approach employing a locally pooled (smoothed) variance estimate can outperform the comparable Statistical Parametric Mapping approach. Thus, these nonparametric techniques can be used to verify the validity of less computationally expensive parametric approaches. Although the theory and relative advantages of permutation approaches have been discussed by various authors, there has been no accessible explication of the method, and no freely distributed software implementing it. Consequently, there have been few practical applications of the technique. This article, and the accompanying MATLAB software, attempts to address these issues. The standard nonparametric randomization and permutation testing ideas are developed at an accessible level, using practical examples from functional neuroimaging, and the extensions for multiple comparisons described. Three worked examples from PET and fMRI are presented, with discussion, and comparisons with standard parametric approaches made where appropriate. Practical considerations are given throughout, and relevant statistical concepts are expounded in appendices. Hum. Brain Mapping 15:1–25, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. I The Design of Experiments , 1936, Nature.

[2]  E. Pitman Significance Tests Which May be Applied to Samples from Any Populations , 1937 .

[3]  E. J. G. Pitman,et al.  Significance Tests Which May be Applied to Samples from Any Populations. II. The Correlation Coefficient Test , 1937 .

[4]  E. Pitman SIGNIFICANCE TESTS WHICH MAY BE APPLIED TO SAMPLES FROM ANY POPULATIONS III. THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TEST , 1938 .

[5]  M. Kendall Rank Correlation Methods , 1949 .

[6]  M. Dwass Modified Randomization Tests for Nonparametric Hypotheses , 1957 .

[7]  E. Edgington Approximate Randomization Tests , 1969 .

[8]  Eugene S. Edgington,et al.  Statistical inference : the distribution-free approach , 1969 .

[9]  R. Forthofer,et al.  Rank Correlation Methods , 1981 .

[10]  Karl-Heinz Jockel,et al.  Finite Sample Properties and Asymptotic Efficiency of Monte Carlo Tests , 1986 .

[11]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1989 .

[12]  Ronald Aylmer Sir Fisher,et al.  Statistical Methods, Experimental Design, and Scientific Inference , 1990 .

[13]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Linear Spatial Correlation Model, with Applications to Positron Emission Tomography , 1991 .

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism Comparing Functional (pet) Images: the Assessment of Significant Change , 2022 .

[15]  M. Kendall,et al.  Rank Correlation Methods (5th ed.). , 1992 .

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[17]  S. S. Young,et al.  Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-Value Adjustment , 1993 .

[18]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  J B Poline,et al.  Analysis of Individual Positron Emission Tomography Activation Maps by Detection of High Signal-to-Noise-Ratio Pixel Clusters , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[20]  P. Roland,et al.  Three‐dimensional analysis of clustered voxels in 15O‐butanol brain activation images , 1993 .

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Andrew P. Holmes,et al.  Statistical issues in functional brain mapping. , 1994 .

[23]  J Ashburner,et al.  Emission Tomography: An Event-Related Count Rate Correlational Analysis , 1994 .

[24]  K. Worsley,et al.  Local Maxima and the Expected Euler Characteristic of Excursion Sets of χ 2, F and t Fields , 1994, Advances in Applied Probability.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[27]  P. Good,et al.  Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses , 1995 .

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[29]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  A functional neuroanatomy of hallucinations in schizophrenia , 1995, Nature.

[31]  Keith J. Worsley,et al.  The Geometry of Random Images , 1996 .

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[33]  N C Andreasen,et al.  Tests for Comparing Images Based on Randomization and Permutation Methods , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[34]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  J D Watson,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Statistic Images from Functional Mapping Experiments , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[36]  R. J. Frank,et al.  Reliability of PET activation across statistical methods, subject groups, and sample sizes , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[37]  N C Andreasen,et al.  Schizophrenia and cognitive dysmetria: a positron-emission tomography study of dysfunctional prefrontal-thalamic-cerebellar circuitry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[39]  M. Mintun,et al.  Comparison of activation response using functional PET and MRI , 1996, NeuroImage.

[40]  P. J. Jennings,et al.  Time series analysis in the time domain and resampling methods for studies of functional magnetic resonance brain imaging , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[41]  K Wienhard,et al.  Performance of a Randomization Test for Single-Subject 15O-Water PET Activation Studies , 1997, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Combining Spatial Extent and Peak Intensity to Test for Activations in Functional Imaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[43]  M. Hallett Human Brain Function , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[44]  E. Edgington,et al.  Randomization Tests (3rd ed.) , 1998 .

[45]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Holmes and Watson on ‘Sherlock’ , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[46]  J. Duyn,et al.  Investigation of Low Frequency Drift in fMRI Signal , 1999, NeuroImage.

[47]  J. Cao The size of the connected components of excursion sets of χ2, t and F fields , 1999, Advances in Applied Probability.

[48]  John Suckling,et al.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[49]  John Jonides,et al.  Order Information in Working Memory: fMRI Evidence for Parietal and Prefrontal Mechanisms , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Smoothness and degrees of freedom restrictions when using SPM99 , 2001, NeuroImage.