Linking model design and application for transdisciplinary approaches in social-ecological systems

Abstract As global environmental change continues to accelerate and intensify, science and society are turning to transdisciplinary approaches to facilitate transitions to sustainability. Modeling is increasingly used as a technological tool to improve our understanding of social-ecological systems (SES), encourage collaboration and learning, and facilitate decision-making. This study improves our understanding of how SES models are designed and applied to address the rising challenges of global environmental change, using mountains as a representative system. We analyzed 74 peer-reviewed papers describing dynamic models of mountain SES, evaluating them according to characteristics such as the model purpose, data and model type, level of stakeholder involvement, and spatial extent/resolution. Slightly more than half the models in our analysis were participatory, yet only 21.6% of papers demonstrated any direct outreach to decision makers. We found that SES models tend to under-represent social datasets, with ethnographic data rarely incorporated. Modeling efforts in conditions of higher stakeholder diversity tend to have higher rates of decision support compared to situations where stakeholder diversity is absent or not addressed. We discuss our results through the lens of appropriate technology, drawing on the concepts of boundary objects and scalar devices from Science and Technology Studies. We propose four guiding principles to facilitate the development of SES models as appropriate technology for transdisciplinary applications: (1) increase diversity of stakeholders in SES model design and application for improved collaboration; (2) balance power dynamics among stakeholders by incorporating diverse knowledge and data types; (3) promote flexibility in model design; and (4) bridge gaps in decision support, learning, and communication. Creating SES models that are appropriate technology for transdisciplinary applications will require advanced planning, increased funding for and attention to the role of diverse data and knowledge, and stronger partnerships across disciplinary divides. Highly contextualized participatory modeling that embraces diversity in both data and actors appears poised to make strong contributions to the world’s most pressing environmental challenges.

[1]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  A backcasting approach for matching regional ecosystem services supply and demand , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  KILT: A Modelling Approach Based on Participatory Agent-Based Simulation of Stylized Socio-Ecosystems to Stimulate Social Learning with Local Stakeholders , 2017, AAMAS Workshops.

[3]  Marianne de Laet,et al.  The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology , 2017 .

[4]  Moira L. Zellner,et al.  Embracing Complexity and Uncertainty: The Potential of Agent-Based Modeling for Environmental Planning and Policy , 2008 .

[5]  Gustavo A. Arciniegas,et al.  Planning Support Systems and Task-Technology Fit: a Comparative Case Study , 2015 .

[6]  Birgit Müller,et al.  Simple or complicated agent-based models? A complicated issue , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  John Elder,et al.  The Apparent Paradox of Complexity in Ensemble Modeling , 2018 .

[8]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Using agent-based modelling to simulate social-ecological systems across scales , 2019, GeoInformatica.

[9]  P. N. Edwards,et al.  Knowledge Infrastructures: Intellectual Frameworks and Research Challenges , 2013 .

[10]  Karin Frank,et al.  The potential of models and modeling for social-ecological systems research: the reference frame ModSES , 2019, Ecology and Society.

[11]  Leilah Lyons,et al.  Modeling, learning, and planning together: An application of participatory agent-based modeling to environmental planning , 2012 .

[12]  A. P. Dimri,et al.  Does Awareness of Climate Change Lead to Worry? Exploring Community Perceptions Through Parallel Analysis in Rural Himalaya , 2019 .

[13]  D. D. Toit,et al.  ARDI: a co-construction method for participatory modelling in natural resources management , 2011 .

[14]  Philippe J. Giabbanelli,et al.  Twelve Questions for the Participatory Modeling Community , 2018, Earth's Future.

[15]  E. Ostrom A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Claudio Cioffi-Revilla,et al.  Modeling scale and variability in human–environmental interactions in Inner Asia , 2012 .

[17]  François Bousquet,et al.  Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review , 2004 .

[18]  Dirk J. Roux,et al.  Nurturing communities of practice for transdisciplinary research , 2015 .

[19]  Romina Martin,et al.  Describing human decisions in agent-based models - ODD + D, an extension of the ODD protocol , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  John H. Conway,et al.  The game of life. , 1996, The Hastings Center report.

[21]  Esther S. Parish,et al.  Scale and the representation of human agency in the modeling of agroecosystems , 2015 .

[22]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Group creativity : An introduction , 2003 .

[23]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Key features for more successful place-based sustainability research on social-ecological systems: a Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) perspective , 2017 .

[24]  C. Hoch,et al.  How planners and stakeholders learn with visualization tools: using learning sciences methods to examine planning processes , 2017 .

[25]  K. Seto,et al.  Advancing Land Change Modeling: Opportunities and Research Requirements , 2013 .

[26]  Peter J. Taylor Unruly Complexity: Ecology, Interpretation, Engagement , 2005 .

[27]  Dirk R. Schmatz,et al.  Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services in a Mountain Region , 2013 .

[28]  François Bousquet,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  M. Pelling,et al.  Political ecology : an integrative approach to geography and environment-development studies , 2003 .

[30]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro- structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so , 2014 .

[31]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Planetary Opportunities: A Social Contract for Global Change Science to Contribute to a Sustainable Future , 2012 .

[33]  G. Cumming,et al.  Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: Causes, consequences, and solutions , 2006 .

[34]  J. W. Bruce,et al.  The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths , 2001 .

[35]  Paul Nadasdy,et al.  THE POLITICS OF TEK: POWER AND THE "INTEGRATION" OF KNOWLEDGE , 1999 .

[36]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Understanding the Best Evidence in Primary Healthcare , 2013, Journal of family medicine and primary care.

[37]  Henk Ritzema,et al.  Using participatory modelling to compensate for data scarcity in environmental planning: A case study from India , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[38]  Cara E. Steger,et al.  A systematic review of participatory scenario planning to envision mountain social-ecological systems futures , 2020, Ecology and Society.

[39]  Stefano Balbi,et al.  Agent-Based Modelling of Socio-Ecosystems: A Methodology for the Analysis of Adaptation to Climate Change , 2010, Int. J. Agent Technol. Syst..

[40]  Mikaela Sundberg,et al.  Organizing Simulation Code Collectives , 2010 .

[41]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Modelling of spatial dynamics and biodiversity conservation on Lure mountain (France) , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[42]  T. Crane Of Models and Meanings: Cultural Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems , 2010 .

[43]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[44]  Daniel G. Brown,et al.  Empirical characterisation of agent behaviours in socio-ecological systems , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[45]  Joan H. Fujimura,et al.  The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences , 1992 .

[46]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[47]  Werner Rammer,et al.  Coupling human and natural systems: Simulating adaptive management agents in dynamically changing forest landscapes , 2015 .

[48]  Marianne de Laet,et al.  The Zimbabwe Bush Pump , 2000 .

[49]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .

[50]  François Bousquet,et al.  Multi-agent simulations to explore rules for rural credit in a highland farming community of Northern Thailand , 2008, Ecological Economics.

[51]  Mark Altaweel,et al.  Forecasting Resilience in Arctic Societies: Creating Tools for Assessing Social–Hydrological Systems 1 , 2009 .

[52]  Steven M. Alexander,et al.  Qualitative data sharing and synthesis for sustainability science , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[53]  C. Pohl,et al.  Exploring transdisciplinary integration within a large research program: Empirical lessons from four thematic synthesis processes , 2017 .

[54]  Randall B. Boone,et al.  Unexpected climate impacts on the Tibetan Plateau: Local and scientific knowledge in findings of delayed summer , 2014 .

[55]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Spatial representations are not neutral: Lessons from a participatory agent-based modelling process in a land-use conflict , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[56]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .

[57]  Mike Hulme,et al.  Reducing the Future to Climate: A Story of Climate Determinism and Reductionism , 2011, Osiris.

[58]  Uta Berger,et al.  Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.

[59]  David O'Sullivan Complexity science and human geography , 2004 .

[60]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[61]  William C. Clarka,et al.  Boundary Work for Sustainable Development : Natural Resource , 2011 .

[62]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World , 2006 .

[63]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job , 2018, Environ. Model. Softw..

[64]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[65]  Kim Fortun,et al.  Environmental Information Systems as Appropriate Technology , 2004, Design Issues.

[66]  Nina Schwarz,et al.  An integrated modelling framework for simulating regional-scale actor responses to global change in the water domain , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[67]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[68]  D. Haraway Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 1988 .

[69]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  From KISS to KIDS - An 'Anti-simplistic' Modelling Approach , 2004, MABS.

[70]  Shannon O'Lear,et al.  Climate science and slow violence: A view from political geography and STS on mobilizing technoscientific ontologies of climate change , 2016 .

[71]  Max Nielsen-Pincus,et al.  Ecosystem Services as Boundary Objects for Transdisciplinary Collaboration , 2018 .

[72]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Different Modelling Purposes , 2019, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[73]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Science.

[74]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  David J. Augustine,et al.  Complexity fosters learning in collaborative adaptive management , 2019, Ecology and Society.

[76]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Opportunities to Improve Impact, Integration, and Evaluation of Land Change Models , 2013 .

[77]  Sara S. Metcalf,et al.  Strategic directions for agent-based modeling: avoiding the YAAWN syndrome , 2016, Journal of land use science.

[78]  E. Lambin,et al.  Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change , 2010 .

[79]  Gustav Engström,et al.  Resilience offers escape from trapped thinking on poverty alleviation , 2017, Science Advances.

[80]  Maria Tengö,et al.  Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach , 2014, AMBIO.

[81]  B. Schutt Sorting things out. , 1970, The American journal of nursing.

[82]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[83]  Erin Bohensky,et al.  Behaviour and space in agent-based modelling: Poverty patterns in East Kalimantan, Indonesia , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[84]  D. E. Stokes Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[85]  Karen Bakker,et al.  The Eco-Scalar Fix: Rescaling Environmental Governance and the Politics of Ecological Boundaries in Alberta, Canada , 2014 .

[86]  Donna Harawy Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 2022, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[87]  Nicole Latulippe,et al.  Situating the Work: A typology of traditional knowledge literature , 2015 .

[88]  F. Berkes,et al.  Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-Management , 2004 .

[89]  J. Dempsey Enterprising Nature: Economics, Markets, and Finance in Global Biodiversity Politics , 2016 .

[90]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems , 2004 .

[91]  M. Mahony,et al.  The predictive state: Science, territory and the future of the Indian climate , 2014, Social studies of science.

[92]  Paul Schot,et al.  Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities , 2004 .

[93]  S. Rayner,et al.  Weather Forecasts are for Wimps: Why Water Resource Managers Do Not Use Climate Forecasts , 2005 .

[94]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Virtual Engineering: Computer Simulation Modelling for Flood Risk Management in England , 2011 .

[95]  Robert Dyball,et al.  Social Learning in Environmental Management: Towards a Sustainable Future , 2005 .

[96]  Andreas Neef,et al.  Building on qualitative datasets and participatory processes to simulate land use change in a mountain watershed of Northwest Vietnam , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[97]  W. Mauser,et al.  Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability , 2013 .

[98]  Patrice Garin,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Implementing Participatory Water Management: Recent Advances in Theory, Practice and Evaluation Supporting the Shift from State Water to Community Water: Lessons from a Social Learning Approach to Designing Joint Irrigation Projects in Morocco , 2009 .

[99]  Cara E. Steger,et al.  Knowledge coproduction improves understanding of environmental change in the Ethiopian highlands , 2020 .

[100]  R. Moss,et al.  To co-produce or not to co-produce , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[101]  Peat Leith,et al.  Co-Producing Sustainability: Reordering the Governance of Science, Policy, and Practice , 2019, Annual Review of Environment and Resources.

[102]  M. Etienne Companion Modelling: A Participatory Approach to Support Sustainable Development , 2010 .

[103]  Katriina Soini,et al.  National Future Earth platforms as boundary organizations contributing to solutions-oriented global change research , 2016 .

[104]  H. Blumer What Is Wrong with Social Theory , 1954 .

[105]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Eight grand challenges in socio-environmental systems modeling , 2020 .

[106]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene , 2016 .

[107]  A. Agrawal Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge , 1995 .

[108]  David Ribes,et al.  Ethnography of scaling, or, how to a fit a national research infrastructure in the room , 2014, CSCW.

[109]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey , 2000, Ecological Economics.

[110]  Andrew M. Colman,et al.  The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration , 1998, Complex..

[111]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[112]  Eric Nost,et al.  Climate services for whom? The political economics of contextualizing climate data in Louisiana’s coastal Master Plan , 2019, Climatic Change.

[113]  Birgit Müller,et al.  Theoretical foundations of human decision-making in agent-based land use models - A review , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[114]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Catalyzing Transformations to Sustainability in the World's Mountains , 2019, Earth's Future.

[115]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Representing community: knowing users in the face of changing constituencies , 2008, CSCW.

[116]  David O'Sullivan,et al.  Model histories: Narrative explanation in generative simulation modelling , 2012 .

[117]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[118]  John Elder,et al.  Handbook of Statistical Analysis and Data Mining Applications , 2009 .

[119]  J. Bernstein Transdisciplinarity: A Review of Its Origins, Development, and Current Issues , 2015 .

[120]  Dominique Berteaux,et al.  Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Ecological Science: a Question of Scale , 2009 .

[121]  E. Lambin,et al.  The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[122]  Andres Baeza,et al.  A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems , 2017 .

[123]  W. Clark,et al.  Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.