Sex differences in functional network dynamics observed using coactivation pattern analysis

ABSTRACT Sex differences in the organization of large-scale resting-state brain networks have been identified using traditional static measures, which average functional connectivity over extended time periods. In contrast, emerging dynamic measures have the potential to define sex differences in network changes over time, providing additional understanding of neurobiological sex differences. To meet this goal, we used a Coactivation Pattern Analysis (CAP) using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 181 males and 181 females from the Human Connectome Project. Significant main effects of sex were observed across two independent imaging sessions. Relative to males, females spent more total time in two transient network states (TNSs) spatially overlapping with the dorsal attention network and occipital/sensory-motor network. Greater time spent in these TNSs was related to females making more frequent transitions into these TNSs compared to males. In contrast, males spent more total time in TNSs spatially overlapping with the salience network, which was related to males staying for longer periods once entering these TNSs compared to females. State-to-state transitions also significantly differed between sexes: females transitioned more frequently from default mode network (DMN) states to the dorsal attention network state, whereas males transitioned more frequently from DMN states to salience network states. Results show that males and females spend differing amounts of time at rest in two distinct attention-related networks and show sex-specific transition patterns from DMN states into these attention-related networks. This work lays the groundwork for future investigations into the cognitive and behavioral implications of these sex-specific network dynamics.

[1]  R. Kaiser,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of Large-Scale Networks Predict Neural Cue Reactivity and Cue-Induced Craving. , 2020, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

[2]  Yu-Ping Wang,et al.  A GICA-TVGL framework to study sex differences in resting state fMRI dynamic connectivity , 2019, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Sex-related differences in intrinsic brain dynamism and their neurocognitive correlates , 2019, NeuroImage.

[4]  Blaise B Frederick,et al.  Dynamic functioning of transient resting‐state coactivation networks in the Human Connectome Project , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[5]  A. Hiwatashi,et al.  Dysfunction between dorsal caudate and salience network associated with impaired cognitive flexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A resting-state fMRI study , 2019, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[6]  R. Matthew Hutchison,et al.  Abnormal frontoinsular-default network dynamics in adolescent depression and rumination: a preliminary resting-state co-activation pattern analysis , 2019, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[7]  Xiao Liu,et al.  Co-activation patterns in resting-state fMRI signals , 2018, NeuroImage.

[8]  L. Nickerson,et al.  Sex differences in default mode and dorsal attention network engagement , 2018, PloS one.

[9]  Steen Moeller,et al.  The Human Connectome Project's neuroimaging approach , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Kaustubh Supekar,et al.  Distinct Global Brain Dynamics and Spatiotemporal Organization of the Salience Network , 2016, PLoS biology.

[11]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic coherence analysis of resting fMRI data to jointly capture state-based phase, frequency, and time-domain information , 2015, NeuroImage.

[12]  Karsten Specht,et al.  Resting States Are Resting Traits – An fMRI Study of Sex Differences and Menstrual Cycle Effects in Resting State Cognitive Control Networks , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  Steen Moeller,et al.  ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[14]  Ludovica Griffanti,et al.  Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers , 2014, NeuroImage.

[15]  Karen D. Davis,et al.  Sex differences in connectivity of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex , 2014, PAIN®.

[16]  Catie Chang,et al.  Decomposition of spontaneous brain activity into distinct fMRI co-activation patterns , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[17]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[18]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[19]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[20]  Massimo Filippi,et al.  The organization of intrinsic brain activity differs between genders: A resting‐state fMRI study in a large cohort of young healthy subjects , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[21]  Raquel E Gur,et al.  Age group and sex differences in performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in children age 8-21. , 2012, Neuropsychology.

[22]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Behavioral Interpretations of Intrinsic Connectivity Networks , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  P. Lucassen,et al.  Sex Differences in Adolescent Depression: Do Sex Hormones Determine Vulnerability? , 2011, Journal of neuroendocrinology.

[25]  Rex E. Jung,et al.  A Baseline for the Multivariate Comparison of Resting-State Networks , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[26]  V. Menon,et al.  Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[27]  Christian Windischberger,et al.  Toward discovery science of human brain function , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Antao Chen,et al.  Gender differences in behavioral inhibitory control: ERP evidence from a two-choice oddball task. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[30]  Janet Shibley Hyde,et al.  New Directions in the Study of Gender Similarities and Differences , 2007 .

[31]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Brain Connectivity Related to Working Memory Performance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  S. Tipper,et al.  Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[33]  A. Angold,et al.  Continuous Performance Test Performance in a Normative Epidemiological Sample , 2003, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[34]  R. Buckner,et al.  The organization of the human striatum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.