The legacy effects of keystone individuals on collective behaviour scale to how long they remain within a group

The collective behaviour of social groups is often strongly influenced by one or few individuals, termed here ‘keystone individuals’. We examined whether the influence of keystone individuals on collective behaviour lingers after their departure and whether these lingering effects scale with their tenure in the group. In the social spider, Stegodyphus dumicola, colonies' boldest individuals wield a disproportionately large influence over colony behaviour. We experimentally manipulated keystones' tenure in laboratory-housed colonies and tracked their legacy effects on collective prey capture following their removal. We found that bolder keystones caused more aggressive collective foraging behaviour and catalysed greater inter-individual variation in boldness within their colonies. The longer keystones remained in a colony, the longer both of these effects lingered after their departure. Our data demonstrate that, long after their disappearance, keystones have large and lasting effects on social dynamics at both the individual and colony levels.

[1]  A. Love.  A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity , 1892 .

[2]  G. M.,et al.  A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity , 1906, Nature.

[3]  B. Bateman.  An integrative overview. , 1976 .

[4]  D. Sherry,et al.  Cultural transmission without imitation: Milk bottle opening by birds , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Leticia Avilés,et al.  Sex-Ratio Bias and Possible Group Selection in the Social Spider Anelosimus eximius , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[6]  J. Crook.  The Evolution of Leadership: A Preliminary Skirmish , 1986 .

[7]  S. Frank.  DEMOGRAPHY AND SEX RATIO IN SOCIAL SPIDERS , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  J. Traniello.  Foraging Strategies of Ants , 1989 .

[9]  D. Strang,et al.  Of Time and Power: Leadership Duration in the Modern World , 1991 .

[10]  B. O'Flaherty.  OF TIME AND POWER: LEADERSHIP DURATION IN THE MODERN WORLD , 1992 .

[11]  Ann L. Rypstra,et al.  Prey Size, Social Competition, and the Development of Reproductive Division of Labor in Social Spider Groups , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[13]  M. Nakamichi,et al.  Carrying and Washing of Grass Roots by Free-Ranging Japanese Macaques at Katsuyama , 1997, Folia Primatologica.

[14]  NIGEL R FRANKS,et al.  Self-organizing nest construction in ants: individual worker behaviour and the nest's dynamics , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Self-organization in social insects. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Leticia Avilés,et al.  The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids: Causes and consequences of cooperation and permanent-sociality in spiders , 1997 .

[17]  K. Laland,et al.  Social transmission of maladaptive information in the guppy , 1998 .

[18]  C. J. Erickson.  Cues for Prey Location by Aye-Ayes (Daubentonia madagascariensis) , 1998 .

[19]  James F. A. Traniello,et al.  Key individuals and the organisation of labor in ants. , 1999 .

[20]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Inspiration for optimization from social insect behaviour , 2000, Nature.

[21]  S. Durant,et al.  Matriarchs As Repositories of Social Knowledge in African Elephants , 2001, Science.

[22]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[23]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2 , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[25]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  The formation of spatial patterns in social insects: from simple behaviours to complex structures , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[26]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Optimality of collective choices: A stochastic approach , 2003, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[27]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Group decision-making in animals , 2003, Nature.

[28]  A. Sih,et al.  Behavioral Syndromes: An Integrative Overview , 2004, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[29]  M. Newman,et al.  Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  P. E. Kopp,et al.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence , 2005, Nature.

[31]  Masao Kawai,et al.  Newly-acquired pre-cultural behavior of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima islet , 1965, Primates.

[32]  D. Sumpter.  The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  B. Krafft,et al.  Synchronized and rhythmical activity during the prey capture in the social spiderAnelosimus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae) , 1991, Insectes Sociaux.

[34]  T. Bilde,et al.  The Evolution of Sociality in Spiders , 2007 .

[35]  Patricio A. Salazar,et al.  Altitudinal Patterns of Spider Sociality and the Biology of a New Midelevation Social Anelosimus Species in Ecuador , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[36]  Leticia Avilés,et al.  Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  L. Eberly,et al.  Economic profitability of social predation among wild chimpanzees: individual variation promotes cooperation , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  T. Bilde,et al.  Benefits of cooperation with genetic kin in a subsocial spider , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Social Feedback and the Emergence of Leaders and Followers , 2009, Current Biology.

[40]  Dominic D. P. Johnson,et al.  The Origins and Evolution of Leadership , 2009, Current Biology.

[41]  Kate L. Laskowski,et al.  The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  An Integrative Overview , 2009 .

[43]  J. Krause,et al.  Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy , 2009 .

[44]  Kees van Oers,et al.  The effect of personality on social foraging: shy barnacle geese scrounge more , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  R. Dukas,et al.  Social learning about egg-laying substrates in fruitflies , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  D. Sumpter.  Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[47]  N. Fefferman,et al.  Violating Social Norms when Choosing Friends: How Rule-Breakers Affect Social Networks , 2011, PloS one.

[48]  I. Giardina.  Collective Animal Behavior David J.T. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  Sociality and resource use: insights from a community of social spiders in Brazil , 2011 .

[50]  F. Ratnieks.  Honeybee Democracy Thomas D. Seeley Honeybee Democracy , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  J. Poole,et al.  Leadership in elephants: the adaptive value of age , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  T. C. Jones,et al.  Evidence of circadian rhythm in antipredator behaviour in the orb-weaving spider Larinioides cornutus , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  J. Guevara,et al.  Influence of body size and level of cooperation on the prey capture efficiency of two sympatric social spiders exhibiting an included niche pattern , 2011 .

[54]  F. Mery,et al.  Spread of Social Information and Dynamics of Social Transmission within Drosophila Groups , 2012, Current Biology.

[55]  T. Bilde,et al.  Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  A. Sih,et al.  Multilevel selection and effects of keystone hyperaggressive males on mating success and behavior in stream water striders , 2013 .

[57]  A. Pusey,et al.  Ecology rather than psychology explains co-occurrence of predation and border patrols in male chimpanzees , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  J. Pruitt,et al.  RETRACTED: Linking levels of personality: personalities of the ‘average’ and ‘most extreme’ group members predict colony-level personality , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[59]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Behavioural syndromes and social insects: personality at multiple levels , 2014, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[60]  Nathalie Stroeymeyt,et al.  Organisational immunity in social insects. , 2014, Current opinion in insect science.

[61]  Culum Brown,et al.  Individual personality traits influence group exploration in a feral guppy population , 2014 .

[62]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Persistent social interactions beget more pronounced personalities in a desert-dwelling social spider , 2014, Biology Letters.

[63]  S. Bengston,et al.  The development of collective personality: the ontogenetic drivers of behavioral variation across groups , 2014, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[64]  J. Pruitt,et al.  The personality types of key catalytic individuals shape colonies' collective behaviour and success , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  C. Grozinger,et al.  Me and we: the interplay between individual and group behavioral variation in social collectives. , 2014, Current opinion in insect science.

[66]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Exploring How a Shift in the Physical Environment Shapes Individual and Group Behavior across Two Social Contexts , 2014 .

[67]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Collective decision making and social interaction rules in mixed-species flocks of songbirds , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[68]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[70]  Andreas P. Modlmeier,et al.  The keystone individual concept: an ecological and evolutionary overview , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  T. C. Jones,et al.  Diel patterns of foraging aggression and antipredator behaviour in the trashline orb-weaving spider, Cyclosa turbinata , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[72]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[73]  Radhika Nagpal,et al.  Programmable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm , 2014, Science.

[74]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Evidence of social niche construction: persistent and repeated social interactions generate stronger personalities in a social spider , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[75]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Exploring the effects of individual traits and within-colony variation on task differentiation and collective behavior in a desert social spider , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[76]  A. Thornton,et al.  Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds , 2014, Nature.

[77]  William Hoppitt,et al.  Interspecific social networks promote information transmission in wild songbirds , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.