Nine Interaction Guidelines for the Design of Human Computer Interaction in Detailed Scheduling Systems

With the help of modern software, the scheduling process in many fields can be automated nearly completely. However, these systems often provide insufficient interaction possibilities for the scheduler to incorporate his own expert knowledge. Finding and implementing suitable planning decisions is often a time-consuming and error-prone process that is not supported by the computer. This deficiency can impair the practicability of the schedules and hence the benefit of the planning system considerably. In this paper, we deduce 9 interaction guidelines that form a concept for the design of human-computer-interaction in scheduling systems. Unlike approaches that extend general HCI guidelines we derive the rules from recent research on human decision making. From that perspective we define computer support for both the formation and the implementation of planning decisions by the scheduler. The results of a user test show that the concept allows an effective incorporation of the human scheduler. Furthermore the concept can be applied to any detailed scheduling problem.

[1]  Katrin Fischer,et al.  Decision Making in Planning and Scheduling: A Field Study of Planning Behaviour in Manufacturing , 2010 .

[2]  Drew McDermott,et al.  Issues in the Development of Human-Computer Mixed Initiative Planning , 1994 .

[3]  Petra Hofstedt,et al.  Einführung in die Constraint-Programmierung - Grundlagen, Methoden, Sprachen, Anwendungen , 2007, eXamen.press.

[4]  H Donascimento User hints: a framework for interactive optimization , 2004 .

[5]  Hartmut Stadtler Advanced Planning in Supply Chains: Illustrating the Concepts Using an SAP® APO Case Study , 2011 .

[6]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems (8th Edition) , 2006 .

[7]  Julien Cegarra,et al.  Revisiting Decision Support Systems for Cognitive Readiness , 2012 .

[8]  Willemien Visser,et al.  Designing as Construction of Representations: A Dynamic Viewpoint in Cognitive Design Research , 2006, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Allocating Functions to Human and Algorithm in Scheduling , 2010 .

[10]  Peter G. Higgins,et al.  Architecture and interface aspects of scheduling decision support , 2001 .

[11]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Work-centered design: a case study of a mixed-initiative scheduler , 2007, CHI.

[12]  Sönke Hartmann,et al.  A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  The Nature of Expertise in Scheduling: The Case of Timetabling , 2014 .

[14]  F. Darses The constraint satisfaction approach to design : a psychological investigation , 1991 .