Technology-driven business evolution

Innovating the business processes and supporting software systems of an enterprise requires their preliminary analysis and assessment. In particular, data concerning the performance and costs of activities and processes must be gathered in order to identify candidates for innovation. A critical point is finding a suitable presentation means for the gathered data in order to effectively support decision makers. This paper presents two case studies performed by applying a strategy, named Joint Evolution of business Processes and software Systems (JEPS), for innovating business processes and their supporting systems. JEPS integrates measurement, decision-making, and critiquing techniques for analyzing business processes, identifying activities and software systems to be innovated, and mapping critiques onto specific innovation actions. JEPS is supported by a software environment, named WebEv+, for managing the assessment and evaluation tasks, and the modeling and critiquing of the business processes. The paper discusses two case studies regarding two different organizations in the Local Government domain. The analysis of the organization highlighted improvement goals and technological enhancement needs, and permitted the identification of the business processes and software systems to be evolved.

[1]  Michael Rovatsos,et al.  Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering , 2005 .

[2]  Barry G. Silverman,et al.  Expert Critics in Engineering Design: Lessons Learned and Research Needs , 1992, AI Mag..

[3]  Barry G. Silverman,et al.  Survey of expert critiquing systems: practical and theoretical frontiers , 1992, CACM.

[4]  Thierry Bodhuin,et al.  WebEv - a collaborative environment for supporting measurement frameworks , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[5]  Michael Stonebraker,et al.  Legacy Information Systems Migration: Gateways, Interfaces, and the Incremental Approach , 1995 .

[6]  Michael Stonebraker,et al.  Migrating Legacy Systems: Gateways, Interfaces, and the Incremental Approach , 1995 .

[7]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Does the Trend Toward E-Business Call for Changes in the Fundamental Concepts of Information Systems? A Debate , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Thierry Bodhuin,et al.  Evolution of business processes towards eBusiness using a critiquing approach , 2004, SAC '04.

[9]  Thierry Bodhuin,et al.  A framework for measuring business processes based on GQM , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[10]  Louis Cohen,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You , 1995 .

[11]  Jason E. Robbins,et al.  Software architecture critics in the Argo design environment , 1998, Knowl. Based Syst..

[12]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The object advantage - business process reengineering with object technology , 1994 .

[13]  H. D. Rombach,et al.  The Goal Question Metric Approach , 1994 .

[14]  M. Hammer,et al.  REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION , 1995 .

[15]  Victor R. Basili,et al.  A Methodology for Collecting Valid Software Engineering Data , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[16]  Lerina Aversano,et al.  Supporting decisions on the adoption of re-engineering technologies , 2004, Eighth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, 2004. CSMR 2004. Proceedings..

[17]  Harry M. Sneed,et al.  Planning the Reengineering of Legacy Systems , 1995, IEEE Softw..

[18]  John J. Marciniak,et al.  Encyclopedia of Software Engineering , 1994, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering.

[19]  Khaled M. Khan,et al.  Managing Corporate Information Systems Evolution and Maintenance , 2004 .

[20]  Lerina Aversano,et al.  Evolving Legacy System Towards E-Business , 2005 .